Table of Contents for A Hindu Critiques Islam:
- Chapters 1-3: Doctrinal Failings, Samkhya and Advaita Vedanta Critique, What “Islamophobia” Shields
- Chapter 4: Social Status and Genocide Denial
- Chapter 5: Neoliberalism Empowers Islamism
- Chapter 6: Did the British Partition of 1947 Gradually Decline the UK and Bolster India?
- Chapter 7: Islamic Terrorism’s 1st-Generation was Al Qaeda, 2nd-Generation was ISIS, and a 3rd-Generation’s making a Digital Caliphate from “Islamophobia” Censorship
- Chapter 8: The Partition of Free Speech
- Chapters 9 and 10: Follies of Islam Repurposed and Islamism Always Creates Failed States
Extras: Islam’s 200-years of Mass Genocide of Iran, Islam’s 500-years of Mass Genocide of India, and judging from Wikipedia, Islamic Terrorism makes-up 58% of all Terror incidents in India between 1980 – 2024 and that’s lowballing it.
Final Note to Readers: Well, this project took far longer to finish than I had anticipated. I feel somewhat foolish, but this was very important to put into words and share online on my blog for free for the purposes of as massive a dissemination of these ideas as possible. We need real – and obviously peaceful – solutions to this problem and pretending it doesn’t exist is going to cause more harm to vulnerable people. Unfortunately, some of the links in Chapter 9 are old, broken, or no longer exist as they once did in 2019; the Sarah Haider tweets that are quoted and the liveleak videos no longer exist, although I doubt that people would wish to view a video of what the liveleaks are quoting, but please be assured they did exist and it is a real issue in Islamic theology that still happens which is why the liveleaks videos were mentioned. I hope this has brought value, if nothing else.
I plan to make Kindle and physical editions, probably via Amazon, and hopefully no issues arise. Context of the picture used for this final part, the picture is of Ahoo Daryaei who protested Islamic clothing after some reports state she was assaulted despite wearing the required Islamic attire of the hijab in Iran.
Finally, as before, you can click on the images to enlarge them and read them more clearly.
Chapter 9 was originally a chapter in my previous book, Faith in Doubt back in 2019. I’ve added more context to a few subsections and the last subsection is a new addition. I hadn’t put that one in originally, because I did not fully appreciate how literalist of an interpretation that Islam is taken by the majority of Muslims in the world.
Please seriously take the time to consider the following when reading the rest of this chapter: this is what Islamists mass murder people for throughout the entire world. This is why women including young girls in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Britain, and the Middle East are being targeted and raped by Islamist men. This was why Muslim suicide bombers blew themselves up. This is what the 9/11 hijackers kept shouting Allahu Akbar to celebrate on United Airlines Flight 93 to kill Americans and others.[1] This is why they make improvised explosives to blow civilians up annually in India and in Sweden. This is why they behead innocent people for insulting Islam and insulting the Prophet Mohammad. This is what both Islamists and “moderates” spend their entire lives and all their energy to censor and protect from general criticism. This is why they commit physical genocide, cultural genocide, and then use the tyranny of their hurt sentiments to deliberately lie about it. Finally, this is what they want to reduce our entire world’s intellectual, cultural, and social histories and development into because of their unwavering faith in the Abrahamic God:
Contempt for Dogs
Islam’s contempt for dogs is one of the most illogical beliefs I’ve ever come across when researching this religious faith. Some Muslims and Islamic apologists may wish to argue that it was normal for the time period in which these beliefs materialized due to rabid dogs or some other excuse. However, framing this debate as a quirk of ancient culture would be false because Zoroastrianists in Iran during the ancient era during the Islamic conquest of the Sassanid empire were reportedly compassionate and loving towards dogs, while the conquering Muslims were not and treated them horribly.
The arguments against dogs in Islam is frivolous. It’s an appeal to purity that doesn’t distinguish between unclean homeless dogs and well-groomed household dogs, but rather appeals to this notion that dogs are always impure. These negative beliefs come from the teachings of the Islamic Prophet Mohammad, who encourages violence on black dogs in particular. Professor Ahmad Hassan of International Islamic University Malaysia translates the following from the Hadith Book 10: Kitab Al-Said:
This violence against dogs, especially black dogs, in Islamic countries is happening due to the unquestioned obedience to the Prophet Mohammad. To the best of my knowledge, this violence is generally more pronounced in the Arab Spring, but the fact such a stupid and unnecessary form of violence is happening at all, because some man proclaiming to be a Prophet of a God said so, speaks volumes on why Islam can’t change and therefore cannot reform. The enmity towards dogs in Islam gets even more stupid than that. From the website titled Hadith Collection, Book 24 Sahih Muslim translates verse 5246 as follows:
Evidently, an angel which is supposedly a powerful messenger from the Almighty Abrahamic God can’t enter a home or a tent of any person because a dog happens to be there. You’re expected to believe that an angel, with the supposed blessings of an all-powerful cosmic deity, apparently has a weakness where any random dog can prevent them from entering for some unspecified reason. Think about that assertion for a moment. An angel that is harboring the blessings of the same Abrahamic God which people are taught created the entire universe, the earth itself, and who grants miracles to his apostles and his supposed Messiah Jesus, cannot even have his messenger enter a domain so long as a dog is there. How does that make any sense? How can anyone honestly believe that the supposed all-powerful Abrahamic God can’t manage to send an angel to a house with a dog or a picture? Perhaps you may accuse me of the fallacy of incredulity, but I’m basing this argument off of the assumption that this all-powerful God is what he claims to be. Do dogs have a special, powerful quality that even the Abrahamic God cannot overcome? If you would like to make the argument that this was clearly a mistranslated or corrupted Hadith, unfortunately the following verse 5248 from the Hadith Collections gives further credence to this irrational contempt. It reads as follows:
It seems that the Abrahamic God, the Archangel Gabriel, and the Abrahamic God’s Prophet Mohammad couldn’t find a more peaceful way other than to slaughter the vast majority of dogs in their abode. This nearly indiscriminate mass slaughter of dogs was because the Islamic Prophet wanted to talk to his angel friend. The ongoing ruthless treatment of dogs in the Arab Spring is because of the teachings of the Prophet Mohammad. The Abrahamic God, in his infinite wisdom, couldn’t have Gabriel give the Prophet Mohammad a better solution and the Prophet Mohammad, an apparently sinless prophet just like the prophets before him, couldn’t come-up with a better solution than killing the majority of dogs. Which is more likely: that the Abrahamic God exists and Mohammad is his Prophet, or Mohammad was a psychotic warlord that found excuses for his violent tendencies? Needless to say, this proves that Islam is not a religion of peace for dogs.
Animal Sacrifice
“Even as a child, this Eid was horrifying.“[1] wrote Sarah Haider, prominent Ex-Muslim activist and Co-Founder of Ex-Muslims of North America, on her twitter page in 2018 explaining her experience with the annual Islamic celebration of Eid. “I remember witnessing a sacrifice of a cow with my family, I remember the blood gushing from its throat and running through the street. The story of Abraham which it commemorates is another horror. I’ll save my Mubaraks for the other Eid.“[2]
She follows up her tweet by politely requesting for people to respect her wishes and to not respond with gruesome pictures. Another Ex-Muslim chimes in with his recollection of remembering the wrath on the slaughterer’s visage and how he felt disturbed by what he experienced from the festival.[3] Haider responds by mentioning that she remembered the son of a butcher innocently playing in the blood of the dead animal.[4] The same Ex-Muslim male explains a quip about how fasting before the ritualized animal sacrifice was to avoid throwing up, and then goes onto mention how fortunate he is that he could leave the Islamic world before becoming desensitized to such barbarity.[5]
I stared at my computer screen reading her tweet attempting to comprehend it. I regarded Sarah Haider to be a reliable and intelligent person at the time; her and other Ex-Muslim panels from her organization did much to explain the problems and dangers of Islam that I hadn’t been aware of. What I had struggle internalizing for a few minutes was that this annual festival of animal sacrifice was true and not some crackpot conspiracy theory made-up by far-right organizations to dehumanize Muslims. I made a quick response explaining I was left speechless and dumbfounded by learning that such a stupid event was actually real. It confirmed in my mind what I had suspected; Islam was just the babbling insanity of a 7th century illiterate warlord who formed an imperialistic project. I searched online for more information and was shocked by the details. Islamic theology was rife with debates on the importance of sacrificing an animal with special pleading arguments. At that moment, I couldn’t fathom how anybody could take Islam seriously. Snapshots of Muslims smiling in congregations to the snapshots of bloody images of dead animals as proof of their devotion to the Abrahamic God.[6] The most immediate issue that struck me, and which convinced me that Islam could never be reformed, was that Muslims across the world hadn’t even attempted to change this ritual to be more cosmetic to keep the supposed meaning without the need to slaughter helpless animals. It was because of their deep faith in the Abrahamic God as thoroughly explained in Islamic theology, the meaning was to sacrifice for the Abrahamic God as Abraham was fully willing to sacrifice his son.[7]
For those who don’t know, the celebration of Eid al-Fitr to Eid al-Adha (the latter of which translates to Festival of Sacrifice) is an annual and mandatory celebration within the Islamic faith after Ramadan.[8] Judging from what I have read, it seems the shortened name for these two conjoined holidays is Eid. The slaughter of an animal specified as acceptable to kill is celebrated as proof of piety within Islam.[9][10] Yet again, the reason it hasn’t changed is because Islam forbids “bid’ah” (or in other translations “bidah”[11]) which roughly means “innovation in religion / invention in religion” as a translation according to the website Questions on Islam which explains the practice.[12] When researching this Islamic holiday, I recall a joke during my high school years in which an online penpal and I mused that at least religions weren’t sacrificing animals anymore. Lo and behold, how wrong I was about this notion and that Islam remains consistent with this belief too, even after 1400 years. News articles attempting to be “respectful” and maintain “civil discourse” about this idiotic religious practice show the depth of how useless political correctness is.[13] Attempting to humanize animal slaughter by depicting it as a pious social event instead of a psychotic and meaningless slaughter of animals do a grave injustice to both animal rights and the horrors in which young Muslim children are forced to witness, but it may also delegitimize the Western mainstream media in the eyes of the non-Muslim public as a whole. The reason this portion was so difficult to write is because I kept thinking: ‘Do I really need to make an effort to argue why religiously sanctioned animal slaughter is wrong? Have we not moved past even this point as a species?‘ but of course, people on Sarah Haider’s twitter began commenting about the similarities to factories in which animals are slaughtered as an attempt to justify this idiotic practice.
Nevertheless, for the sake of my commitment to academic integrity, I will attempt to give a serious response to this asinine religious practice. However, I feel that I should mention how absurd I find the notion that I must actually argue against animal sacrifices in the 21st century and I feel I should reiterate how ridiculous I find attempts by any online media to humanize this disgusting, violent ritualized form of animal cruelty. My personal disgust with this topic due to my bias of Western moral sensibilities and Hindu religious sensibilities (which I’m sure that Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains likely share) is what makes this entire Islamic celebration utterly stupid and vomit-inducing; after learning about this ritual and the dehumanization of women, I can no longer see anything about the Islamic religious tradition as deserving of any respect. I honestly tried to be reasonable and separate the positives from the negatives when researching Islam, but everything about this religion leads me to conclude that it is nothing more than a violent, hateful imperialist project of the 7th century. The only positive it has over Scientology is that it can make its barbarous history look exotic and mysterious because it is so old and can more successfully make an appeal to population fallacy which coincides with an appeal to tradition fallacy. Islam’s faults aren’t limited to just this issue and the problems only worsen as I will be elaborating further on. I honestly have to wonder how many Muslims actually tried to use logic and reason on their own religious faith, because I am genuinely bewildered that just animal sacrifice itself didn’t get mocked out of the religious tradition and I can only infer that fear and intimidation within Islamic societies is far deeper than people recognize. The fact Muslims still sacrifice animals goes against the very ideas of logic and reason that practically every other culture feels accustomed to at this point and time in history. For all the arguments on the supposed backwardness of religious traditions indigenous to Asia, the vast majority are clearly superior to Islam. I’m sure many Muslims and Westerners can point to some bizarre subset of a small population within South or East Asia conducting animal sacrifice and even occurrences in South America by a few Indigenous religious groups, but the vast majority of the religious traditions don’t do animal sacrifices, eat brains, or other nonsense. Perhaps there are people in the most remote or ignored locations sacrificing animals, but you would think that after a certain degree of educational attainment, they would stop and realize it is a stupid practice. I don’t care how bigoted or stupid you find this comment, because I have to be blunt here: I doubt I will ever see a Muslim as capable or as intelligent as a non-Muslim ever again, if they support animal sacrifices. I think I was wrong to ever believe that Muslims were equal in intelligence to any non-Muslim or that they could ever reform and change the terrible rituals that they practice, if they do this. I apologize if that seems dehumanizing, but I can’t hold back my utter disgust for this religious ceremony that people practice. The only reform possible for Muslims seems to be becoming Ex-Muslims to avoid bid’ah creating a return to tradition movement.
To set aside my personal disgust and focus on the purposes of critiquing animal sacrifice. First, the intentions of slaughtering an animal for the Abrahamic God and slaughtering an animal to eat it are as far removed in intent as possible; one requires the murder of an animal because the Abrahamic God commands that you show him deference, the other is to feed whole populations to keep a country healthy and any waste of food can be ameliorated through reform in a society that mass produces food in abundance. By contrast, Islam requires adherents to physically slit the throat of an animal and appreciate as it chokes to death in order for Muslims to prove their love and devotion to the Abrahamic God.[14] Animals in production factories are generally in sterile conditions where people can make sure that the meat isn’t diseased. Even in cases of corporations not following through with keeping conditions sterile, it’s safer for there to be a factory keeping the diseased meat isolated. In the context of the ritualized murder of helpless animals by Islamic doctrine, the meat has a higher chance of being diseased and potentially causing food poisoning or worse for a Muslim family. Second, it leaves horrible mental images in children’s minds that has shown to live with them for a lifetime and makes it a requirement for them to become desensitized to brutal violence against animals every year. Some may argue that I am attempting to infer an objective morality to this equation against Islam, but this horrific celebration is defended in reverence to the Abrahamic God on the basis of Islam’s objective morality.[15] The sacrifice of an animal is embedded as an annual religious holiday in Islam and is a form of Divine Command Theory. Therefore, as a third point of contention, Islam’s Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice) is an annual real-world example of the utter flaws of Divine Command Theory. Muslims actively butcher animals mercilessly every year to express their honest love and devotion to the Abrahamic God.[16] Finally, due to Islam being a faith that seeks converts, it creates a pointless demand for the oversupply of animals so that nearly two billion or more can kill an animal and divvy them up among seven people at most to eat.[17] Even granting that millions of animals are slaughtered each day, this ritualized religious practice still increases the slaughter of animals by approximately the hundreds of millions or possibly more. The more this religion spreads, the worse it will be for the sustainability of the environment, and that is even granting that it is a drop in the puddle of bloodshed for daily animal slaughter. This needless slaughter of animals is further credence that Islam isn’t a religion of peace for animals in general. Islamic teachings are against changing this practice and therefore against making it more ceremonial.[18] If Islam had been a religion of peace or capable of adapting with modernity, it would have changed the very real annual slaughter of animals to something else entirely. Perhaps having kids have fun striking a piñata to make this religious celebration more akin to a modernized ceremonial form of worship. It doesn’t have to be precisely that, but at least something equivalent to striking a piñata. It is clear that Islam wouldn’t have religious values declaring that it can’t be changed, if it was actually a peaceful religion that could modernize.
Bestiality
Years ago, footage of Afghan Muslims committing bestiality outside their homes, such as atop their small rooftops had been filmed by US troops and leaked unto liveleaks.com for worldwide viewing.[19] Muslim men were seen penetrating the backside or mouth of goats and other animals from thermal vision.[20][21] The problem has been stated to exist in other predominately Islamic countries too and isn’t limited to just Afghanistan. Social critiques have been offered such as pointing out the impoverished and rural living conditions along with extreme sexual repression within the Islamic faith as explanations for these acts of bestiality in an effort to understand why this bizarre phenomenon is happening. The internet term “goatfucker” by the internet hacktivist group Anon and other self-stylized “trolls” (trolls being an English-language colloquial term for people who intentionally seek to cause offense to others for their own fun) similar to 4Chan have been used as slang identification for these Muslims and certain prominent Islamic groups. Spy equipment has found that even Islamic terrorists commit these acts of bestiality; it is likely much to the chagrin or amusement for the armed forces who are checking the spying equipment.[22]
Many Muslim apologists may try to use this as proof that terrorist organizations and the general public of these Islamic majority countries aren’t acting in accordance with Islamic teachings. They may be quick to point to Hadiths that condemn bestiality, such as the Hadith that equates homosexuality with bestiality and commands Muslims to kill both homosexuals and those who commit fornication with animals. From Sunnah.com, the Hadith from Book 10 verse 1255 in the English version and 1216 in the Arabic version states as follows:
However, there are other Hadiths that are completely in line with what these Afghan men and some terrorists are doing by raping the animals. From the Hadith Collection, Book 33 verse 4450 says the following:
And yet another from Sunnah.com, which clarifies that Hadiths supporting any punishment for bestiality are weaker than those that permit bestiality within Islamic theology:
Source: https://sunnah.com/abudawud:4465
Source: https://sunnah.com/abudawud:4464
As such, bestiality is an open question in Islamic societies. How can this be a religion of peace when it is okay with raping animals? Does that seem incredibly stupid to ask? Unfortunately, Islam allows it to be an open question within its theology, so bestiality has to be questioned and repudiated from an outsider perspective too. To better understand how deeply embedded bestiality actually is within Islamic theology and that this is unfortunately not a joke, despite how absurd it sounds:
Zoroastrians in Medieval Iran challenged Islam’s theological support for bestiality. The Skand Gumanig-Wizar, which translates to “Doubt-dispelling Disquisition” in English, has survived quotes criticizing bestiality in Islam. It is a Zoroastrian book authored by an individual named Mardanfarrox, who identified himself as the son of Ohrmazddad. The book was written during the Middle Ages and attempted to give a Zoroastrian perspective on Islamic theology approximately around the 9th century. In an English translation of the book’s latter two chapters, titled “The Definitive Zoroastrian Critique of Islam: Chapters 11 –12 of the Skand Gumanig-Wizar by Mardanfarrox son of Ohrmazddad” translated by Christian C. Sahner, the criticism of Islam’s endorsement for bestiality is on pages 147 – 148. It is translated as follows:
Can a man screw his own donkey simply because he owns it?
11.205 Furthermore: those who belong to a group of them say that God has authority over every creature and creation.
11.206 For His creations all belong to Him.
11.207 However it behooves Him and whatever behooves Him He does to them; [but] He is not an agent of violence.
11.208 For violence is what they do to something which does not belong to them.
11.209 Then He to whom all things belong, doing to them whatever behooves Him, He is not an agent of violence.
11.210 Then let Him know that if, on account of being the ruler, He who does violence must also not be called an agent of violence
11.211 Then also, He who is the ruler [and] speaks lies must be speaking the truth.
11.212 Also He who, on account of being the ruler, commits evil, sin, and robbery, He should not be called a sinner
11.213 Just as the Blessed Rosn son of Adurfarnbag said as an analogy.
11.214 “They saw a man who was screwing a donkey.
11.215 When they asked him, ‘Why are you doing this abominable deed?’
11.216 He gave as an excuse, ‘It’s a donkey belonging to me!”[1]
[1] Mardanfarrox. “Can a Man Screw His Own Donkey Simply Because He Owns It?” The Definitive Zoroastrian Critique of Islam: Chapters 11 –12 of the Skand Gumanig-Wizar by Mardanfarrox Son of Ohrmazddad, translated by Christian C. Sahner, Paperback ed., Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, Merseyside, 2023, pp. 147–148.
The translator, Christian C. Sahner, commented in the notes on page 147 that “The argument that follows reads like a caricatured portrayal of extreme theological voluntarists[1]” to the above quote. Sahner is almost certainly wrong on his assessment. Mardanfarrox was commenting on a real event that he probably witnessed Muslims commit right in front of him, because Islam’s contradictory Hadiths make committing bestiality an open question in terms of morality. In other words, from just Islamic theology itself, all available evidence suggests that some medieval Muslims in Iran almost certainly committed bestiality because it is considered a “deep” and “profound” question that Islamic theology has never settled. Medieval Zoroastrians were likely eyewitness to it, just as American servicemembers witnessed Afghan Muslim men and Islamic terrorists raping goats and donkeys. Supposed scholars of the West repeatedly prove that they don’t understand the intellectual limitations of Islam, but this leaves them to draw ignorant and false conclusions as a result. Mardanfarrox’s criticism was both genuine and respectful of Islamic theology.
Finally, consider the fact that prior to Islam, the civilization that made-up Afghanistan were known for an astounding syncretic culture of Greek and Dharmic philosophies in which Greeks, Hindus, and Buddhists all lived together in polities, created shared art and coinage, and were popularly known for debating and sharing philosophical ideas which resulted in survived records of philosophies like Pyrrhonism which was influenced by Buddhism from what the evidence shows.[2][3] Once Islam took hold through bloodshed and conquest, the debates in Muslim-majority Afghanistan have become about whether having sexual intercourse with goats and donkeys is morally permissible or not. This is the genuine intellectual difference between Islam and other cultures philosophies.
Female Slaves in Heaven
Another one of Islam’s numerous defects is the Hadiths related to the sexual slavery of women and the descriptions of exotic supernatural women whose sole purpose is the sexual pleasure of Muslim men.[4] There are thorough details about how these women won’t ever exhibit the so-called “impurities” of normal women on earth when faithful Muslim men go to heaven with full erections to have sex with them.[5] This very issue shows the massive failings of making a religion’s afterlife more concrete in conceptualization and the ignorance of the Islamic Prophet and his followers. Muslim apologists may be quick to argue those Hadiths have no bearing on the Quran and are inauthentic, but the Quran itself has verses mentioning pure virgin women in Chapter 56 “The Event” (sūrat l-wāqiʿah) on verses 35 through 38.[6] Chapter 78 “The Tidings” (“An-Naba”) verses 31 through 40 also affirms the existence of female slaves in heaven created specifically for Muslim men who enter heaven.[7]
First, the Quran chapter 56, verses 35 – 38:
And, Quran chapter 78, verses 31 – 34:
These teachings help to perpetuate the dehumanization of women as sex objects without any personality of their own and could credibly be argued as an ancient form of “women as reward” – a term popularly coined by sex-negative feminist and video game critic Anita Sarkeesian.[1] Despite whatever objections people may have, the similarities of seeing women as a reward are certainly there; it is the idea that after arduous tribulations, men will be rewarded with the sexual reward of women’s bodies that they will fornicate with at the man’s leisure.[2][3] To be clear, I am not denigrating any man or woman who has such sexual fantasies or who would want to partake in such ideas among consenting adults, but this “reward” being part of a religion that largely discourages a follower to pursue a healthy sexual experience is quite jarring and based upon owning women as property of men. Moreover, the description of this Islamic afterlife doesn’t devalue the argument about Islam internalizing and protecting a concept of purity, because the description of these otherworldly female slaves are celebrated in terms of purity and virginity being synonymous.[4] It comes attached to some vague idea of heavenly radiance that seems to further symbolize otherworldly purity.[5] As a fictional concept, this idea is fine, but people who honestly believe this is what happens after they either suicide bomb, or are martyred in some other way, do present a danger to innocent civilians everywhere. The “women as reward” functions as coping mechanism to commit horrific atrocities and feel both blessed and sexually gratified for causing violence upon others in the form of martyrdom. It is not inconsistent with Islamic doctrines, but rather exists because of Islamic doctrines.
Here are two Hadiths from Sunnah.com that express women as reward for Muslim men, which could be a credible reason, or at least a partial reason, for their motives when inculcated into Islamic Jihad and plausibly because of their solidarity with Muslim terrorists:
“Hadith – Chapters on the Description of Paradise – Jami` at-Tirmidhi – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم).” Riyad as-Salihin – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), www.sunnah.com/urn/678680.
“Hadith – Zuhd – Sunan Ibn Majah – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم).” Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/urn/1294400.
This is part of the reason I doubt Islam can ever be reformed. How do you even pursue a serious conversation about this? What reform is possible with such ideas? It is key to note that these are blatantly sexist beliefs about women’s bodies that are followed by unquestioned obedience to the Abrahamic God. Everyone in the world is safer when we can freely denigrate such ridiculous views without the threat of violence from Islamic groups and the drowning out of controversial statements for questioning the supposed sacredness of religious beliefs through censorship campaigns like claiming criticism is Islamophobia.
Fear of Satan
This specific list was compiled and shared in a humorous video criticizing Islam by the Turkish Ex-Muslim activist Ridvan Aydemir.[1] I’ve only edited it slightly and cannot claim any credit on its compilation. Ridvan Aydemir left Islam many years ago while keeping silent about it in Turkey and moved to the United States where he produces video content criticizing Islam based upon Islamic sources from its own sacred books. He uses the pseudonym “Apostate Prophet” on Youtube and produces videos criticizing Islam to warn people of the dangers of Islam. He doesn’t share in the disdain for all religions as some other Ex-Muslim activists do and argues in defense of other religions like Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Parsis, Sikhism, and Buddhism as being inherently peaceful religions that don’t need to be criticized. He argues that Liberals are largely naive about the dangers of Islam and they need to be more critical of it in defense of their values whether in the democratic countries of the West or in other democratic countries like India. He shares his criticisms freely on Youtube and encourages people to share and become more informed about the dangers of the Islamic faith.[2] He is an incredible inspiration and holds an amazing wealth of knowledge about Islam. I would be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge his important contributions to the dialogue of criticizing Islam and I highly encourage everyone to give his videos on Youtube a chance.[3] In my original book, Faith in Doubt, I added several more points of contention to my critiques thanks to his wealth of knowledge from his video content on Youtube.[4] Ex-Muslims like him live in fear of being killed for wanting freedom to think for themselves. They are continuing to have their voices shut down by social media companies in deference to Islamic despots, their voices are being shut down by Liberals who ignore their human rights by claiming the Free Speech rights of Ex-Muslims to criticize Islam for wanting them to be killed is offensive to Muslims, and as such Ex-Muslims have every right to be angry at Liberals who ignore the plight of their human rights in favor of the meaningless and idealistic view of tolerance.[5] As of now, the current identity politics of many Liberal voices that argue this erroneous notion that nobody can understand or empathize with the experiences of specific groups without being part of that group is not only damaging, but actively dangerous for the human rights of Ex-Muslims. As such, I am endeavoring to promote their Free Speech and human rights as much as I can. I sincerely apologize to Ridvan Aydemir and any other Ex-Muslim, if it seems as if my support is misconstruing or somehow harming their cause in some unintentional manner. I have credited their contributions as much as I can and don’t wish to claim their hard work as my own. I simply wish to make it clear that their human rights and Free Speech need to be protected and that religious tolerance can endanger their lives.
Islam serves as an example of how ridiculous and idiotic the belief and fear of Satan is. It is not only paranoia, but the conspiratorial nature of faith-based thinking that is demonstrated with this irrational fear and lack of evidence-based critical thinking skills. The following aims to show copious amounts of evidence of that. The following was also written in a more jovial manner with the defense of Free Speech and especially the freedom to offend as the motivation.
Evidently, the Abrahamic God enjoys when Muslims sneeze and hates when Muslims yawn because yawns are caused by Satan. Satan apparently laughs at Muslims who yawn:
Good dreams are apparently from the Abrahamic God and bad dreams are from Satan, the Prophet Mohammad instructed Muslims that they should spit three times over their left shoulder and seek the way of Islam’s version of the Abrahamic God so that Satan’s dream won’t harm Muslims:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Hadith Number 124.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 6 June 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-87-interpretation-of-dreams/sahih-bukhari-volume-009-book-087-hadith-number-124.
The pedophile Prophet of Islam was so wise and so far ahead of his time that he warned us all that bells are the musical instrument of Satan. Truly, criticizing such astonishing wisdom is deeply offensive to Muslim sensibilities for good reason:
Hadith – The Book of Clothes and Adornment – Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/muslim/37/159.
Incidentally, this is just another in a laundry list of failures from so-called experts of Western Indology, since they didn’t realize this belief that musical instruments are forbidden comes straight from Islam itself, moreover the argument cited and claimed to have come from Professor Audrey Truschke in the Wiki summary below flies in the face of basic logic. The Wiki writers and potentially Truschke herself are assuming hearsay and memory issues of her own source, when all a historian can actually do is rely upon the eyewitness account of the source. Assuming memory issues of the source with no basis in fact-finding research behind it, because the source wrote about how Aurangzeb’s scorched-earth policies caused the deaths of millions of Muslims is not an honest attempt at historical research. Is she actually giving an honest account of history or is she creating her own fanfiction of another people’s history to create “controversy” for book sales?
In his Abrahamic God-given wisdom, the pedophile Prophet of Islam explained that babies cry when they’re born because Satan touches them:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Hadith Number 641.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 26 Apr. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-55-prophets/sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-055-hadith-number-641.
According to the pedophile prophet of Islam, the crowing of roosters is a sign that roosters have seen an angel and the braying of donkeys is a sign that donkeys have seen Satan:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-4/Book-54/Hadith-522/.
In accordance with the wise words of the illiterate and pedophilic Prophet of Islam, you should eat food you dropped from the ground because otherwise Satan will eat it and be sure to lick your fingers so the food is more likely to bless you:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-23/Hadith-5046/.
For those of you who may be adamant to argue that I am creating a strawman of Islam or that I am unfairly implying that Muslims are somehow intellectually inferior to the practitioners of all other religions on average, I want it to be clear that I am mocking Islam as a belief system. The reason it is so illogical is precisely because it is a faith-based system that orients itself towards enforcing Divine Command Theory upon real life. Divine Command Theory is often opposed because it is authoritarian, but that shouldn’t obscure its other crucial issue. Divine Command Theory is fundamentally irrational and creates so many silly suppositions and practices that cause needless mental consternation, contempt, self-loathing, and can lead to horrific outcomes. As much as you may find this mockery offensive, I would argue to allow a set of idiotic practices without any criticism is even more offensive, especially when it can and does lead to human rights crimes. The first Hadith is a chain of narration, the second portion below it is an explanation by an “Islamic Scholar” and the sheer idiocy of what you’re about to read should speak for itself. However, for the select few that may find this portion to be a facile criticism, it should be noted that the dexterity of your hands is developed in the womb from the development of your spine.[1] Therefore, what the Islamic Prophet Mohammad asked of some of his followers on what could be argued to be an innocuous demand wasn’t possible because of how their motor cortex from their brains was transmitting electrical impulses with the spine.[2] Notwithstanding, the pedophile Prophet Mohammad’s ignorance and the stupidity of the hadiths chain of narration system as shown below:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Muwatta Malik Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Malik/USC-MSA/Book-49/Hadith-6/.
This is what Islamic Imams really believe because they cannot question the Quran. Take the time to just read and understand that there are people still living today who believe in this (PDF Copy):
The reason why the right hand is preferred over the left
Question: 82120
Why is the right hand preferred over the left hand when greeting, eating and in other cases? What is wrong with using the left hand for these purposes?.
Answer
Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah.
It is part of Allah’s complete blessing upon us and the perfection of this great religion, that Islam organizes all aspects of our lives. There is nothing good but it has shown it to us, and there is nothing bad but it has warned us against it. As well as beliefs, acts of worship, interactions with others and morals and manners, that also includes our private affairs in which Islam shows us the way that is befitting to man’s noble status and the way in which Allah has honoured him. That includes the way the Muslim eats and drinks, and so on.
This is an established principle in sharee’ah: that which has to do with honour and nobility, such as putting on one’s garment and pants and shoes, entering the mosque, using the siwaak, putting on kohl, clipping the nails, trimming the moustache, combing the hair, plucking the armpit hair, shaving the head, saying salaam at the end of prayer, washing the limbs when purifying oneself, exiting the toilet, eating and drinking, shaking hands, touching the Black Stone, etc are all things which it is mustahabb to start on the right or use the right hand. As for things which are the opposite, such as entering the toilet, exiting the mosque, blowing one’s nose, cleaning oneself after using the toilet, taking off one’s garment, pants and shoes, and so on, it is mustahabb to start on the left or use the left hand. All of that is because the right hand is more noble and honoured. This was stated by al-Nawawi in Sharh Saheeh Muslim. There is a great deal of evidence to support this principle, such as the following:
In al-Saheehayn it is narrated that ‘Umar ibn Salamah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “O young boy, say the name of Allah and eat with your right hand, and eat from what is nearest to you.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5376) and Muslim (2022).
In Saheeh Muslim (2021) it is narrated that a man ate with his left hand in the presence of the Messenger of Allah (S). He said: “Eat with your right hand.” He said: I cannot. He said: “May you never be able to,” for nothing was preventing him from doing so but arrogance. And he never raised it to his mouth again.
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) prayed against him so that what he claimed of not being able to do it would come true, because he was too arrogant to follow the truth and he did not observe proper etiquette with the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and his excuse was a lie, and lying to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is not like lying to anyone else.
In Sunan Abi Dawood (33) it is narrated that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The right hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was for his purification and food, and his left hand was for using the toilet and anything that was dirty. Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.
Muslim (262) narrated that Salmaan (may Allah be pleased with him) said: He (meaning the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)) forbade any one of us to clean himself with his right hand.
And Muslim (2020) narrated from Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “No one among you should eat with his left hand or drink with it, for the shaytaan eats with his left hand and drinks with it.”
Allah has warned us against disobeying the commands of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), as He says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And let those who oppose the Messenger’s (Muhammad’s) commandment (i.e. his Sunnah __ legal ways, orders, acts of worship, statements) (among the sects) beware, lest some Fitnah (disbelief, trials, afflictions, earthquakes, killing, overpowered by a tyrant) should befall them or a painful torment be inflicted on them”
[al-Noor 24:63]
This applies if one is able to eat with the right hand. But if one is unable to do so, there is no sin in that. Al-Nawawi said in Sharh Muslim (13/191): The objection to eating and drinking with the left hand applies so long as there is no excuse. If there is an excuse which prevents one from eating and drinking with the right hand because of sickness, injury etc, then it is not makrooh. End quote.
Al-Ghazaali said in al-Ihya’ (4/93): Then the One Who gave you two hands to do things with, some of which are noble, such as picking up the Mus-haf, and some are ignoble, such as removing impurities. So if you pick up the Mus-haf with your left hand, and you remove impurities with your right hand, then you have used that which is noble to do something ignoble, and you have neglected its rights and wronged it, and turned away from what is proper. End quote.
To sum up what the scholars have said about the reasons why the right hand is preferred for things that are noble:
1-That is differing from the shaytaan, as in the case of eating and drinking.
2-It is honouring the right hand over the left.
3-It is using proper etiquette with people, so that one does not shake hands with them, take things from them or give things to them with the hand with which one removes impurities.
4-It is a sign of hope that Allah will make us among those who are on the right hand (ahl al-yameen).
And Allah knows best.
Reference
“The Reason Why the Right Hand Is Preferred over the Left – Islam Question & Answer.” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, 2 Mar. 2007, islamqa.info/en/answers/82120/the-reason-why-the-right-hand-is-preferred-over-the-left.
Satan apparently steals your food and when you catch him stealing your food, he’ll teach you some crazy nonsense to recite so that the Abrahamic God will appoint someone to guard you from Satan and also Satan apparently stole food at night. Additionally, according to the pedophile Prophet Mohammad himself, Satan told the truth and is also an absolute liar:
“Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 38 Hadith Number 505.” Muflihun, https://web.archive.org/web/20210208235810/muflihun.com/bukhari/38/505.
Satan’s time of leisure is spending every night tying your hair into knots before untying them while you are asleep. Truly, the pedophile Prophet of Islam was a visionary of the unique variety:
According to the wisdom of Prophet Mohammad, Satan apparently urinates in people’s ears while they’re asleep:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-2/Book-21/Hadith-245/.
When Satan isn’t doing any of that, beware that Satan could be hiding in your nose according to the pedophile Prophet Mohammad himself:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-2/Hadith-462/.
Men should pray to the Abrahamic God while having sexual intercourse with their wives otherwise Satan will harm the child that is conceived from their sexual relations. It is also implied that Satan watches Muslims while they have sex in this hadith:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-4/Book-54/Hadith-493/.
Satan comes in the shape of a woman and so Muslim men should go to their wives immediately to have sexual relations with them in order to relieve their sexual urges to avoid being tempted by Satan:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-8/Hadith-3240/.
Satan intensifies the pain of menstrual bleeding according to the pedophile Prophet Mohammad:
Hadith – The Book of Purification – Bulugh Al-Maram – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/bulugh/1/169.
Muslims must sit close together in prayer to avoid Satan entering through an opening during prayer. He watches and roams about Muslims while they pray:
Hadith – The Book of Virtues – Riyad as-Salihin – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/riyadussaliheen/9/102.
The pedophile prophet Mohammad sought refuge from Satan’s poetry in a prayer to the Abrahamic God, so apparently poetry itself is from Satan:
Hadith – Establishing the Prayer and the Sunnah Regarding Them – Sunan Ibn Majah – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/urn/1281560.
Satan is responsible for making people forget things:
Hadith – Book of Prophets – Sahih Al-Bukhari – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/bukhari/60/73.
Not only does he make you forget, he’ll make you forget how long you pray and he’ll fart when you’re praying:
“Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 11 Hadith Number 582.” Muflihun, https://web.archive.org/web/20200920140329/muflihun.com/bukhari/11/582.
But worst of all, Satan might try to influence you to question religious assumptions and to think for yourself instead of being blindly dependent upon the Abrahamic God to do your thinking for you as per the pedophile Prophet Mohammad’s instructions:
an-Naysābūrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj ibn Muslim ibn Ward al-Qushayrī. “Sahih Muslim Book 1, Hadith Number 244.” Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 9 June 2009, https://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-01-faith/sahih-muslim-book-001-hadith-number-0244.
Hadith – The Book of Faith – Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/muslim/1/253.
The Context of the Prophet Mohammad’s Support for Slavery
While the fears of Satan and belief in female slaves in heaven may garner some amusement and some would argue that such beliefs are harmless, the fact remains that these are deeply held religious beliefs and they are accepted as unquestioned fact because the Islamic Prophet Mohammad taught them to Muslims. In Islam, the Prophet Mohammad is seen as the perfect human being whose example is one to live by, so that means when he took sex slaves and raped them then it is morally justified for Muslim men to kidnap women and rape them as per religious instruction.[1] When the Prophet Mohammad approves of rape, then that means Muslims have a religious right to rape their sex slaves. Most Muslim men in the West wouldn’t do this because they follow secular morals and they’re capable of their own reasoning faculties thanks to secular education, but this does happen in Muslim majority countries and has been spilling over to target non-Muslim women in Western countries from immigrants who originate from countries like Pakistan because either laws support rapists due to the Sharia or the more secular laws just aren’t followed. The majority of Muslim men from Islamic countries are apathetic to the kidnapping and rape of girls as young as nine years of age who are then forced to marry their rapists and then are told to be obedient to their rapist.[2] The rapist tells them to publicly support what was done to them through coercion or they’ll suffer worse as per Islamic teachings that instruct to beat disobedient wives:[3]
Source: https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34
The only way to end the danger of Islam is by criticizing the beliefs. I condemn all forms of anti-Muslim bigotry; most Muslims are better than Islam. I condemn Islam just as I condemn violence against Muslims. This section of the critique will focus on the subject matter of particular hadiths and may not strictly focus on numerical order. This particular set of hadiths concerning sexual slavery was shared online in various comments sections with short comments concerning each one. I was doubtful that they referred to actual hadiths until I became curious enough to search the listed hadiths for myself. To my shock and disgust, this commentator was being completely honest and there are hadiths that justify sexual slavery and thereby legitimize sexual slavery, war rape, and other horrific actions conducted by groups like ISIS and targeting children for gang rapes and sexual slavery by grooming gangs of Muslim men in the West. Muslims may be keen on arguing that the hadiths aren’t “authentic” but all any Islamic organization needs is an Imam of their own saying that the hadiths are authentic to legitimize them so it is a moot point. These teachings must be recognized as harmful and criticized; they must also be recognized as coming from the Islamic faith as they are explicit instructions by the pedophile Prophet Mohammad.
The Islamic Prophet Mohammad stopped the emancipation of six slaves, kept four of the slaves for himself, and cast lots to decide which two would be freed:
an-Naysābūrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj ibn Muslim ibn Ward al-Qushayrī. “Sahih Muslim Book 15, Hadith Number 4112.” Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 July 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-15-oath/sahih-muslim-book-015-hadith-number-4112.
The Prophet Mohammad sold a slave and therefore selling slaves is moral in Islam since the so-called perfect human being did it:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 34, Hadith Number 351.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-34-sales-and-trade/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-034-hadith-number-351.
Manumission refers to releasing a person from slavery, please keep that in mind. This is another reference to the Islamic Prophet Mohammad cancelling the emancipation of a slave in order to sell the slave:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 41, Hadith Number 598.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-41-loans-payment-of-loans-freezing-of-property-bankruptcy/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-041-hadith-number-598.
The Islamic Prophet Mohammad chastised a woman for releasing her slave girl from slavery and instructed that the Muslim woman would have gained a greater reward in heaven if she had sold her slave to a maternal uncle:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 47, Hadith Number 765.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-47-gifts/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-047-hadith-number-765.
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Hadith Number 255.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 7 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-52-fighting-for-the-cause-of-allah-jihaad/sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-052-hadith-number-255.
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 3, Hadith Number 97a.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 8 Dec. 2021, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-03-knowledge/sahih-bukhari-volume-001-book-003-hadith-number-097a.
If all that hasn’t horrified and disgusted readers enough, here are two hadiths in which the Islamic Prophet Mohammad says not to do coitus interruptus. For those who don’t know what that term means, coitus interruptus is the technical term for a man pulling out his penis before ejaculating. In these specific hadiths, Muslim men who had taken slave girl captives from conquered territories are asked by the Prophet Mohammad whether they really pulled their penises out when they raped their slave girls. The conversation is in the context of questioning whether or not pulling out before ejaculating harms the price that the slave girls are sold for. The wording may seem confusing at first, but in their ancient context, people believed that souls were real. The Islamic Prophet Mohammad assures his male Muslim followers who take slave girls and rape them that ejaculating their cum into a slave girl won’t impregnate them unless the Abrahamic God wills it. Therefore, due to the belief in the soul and the belief that the Abrahamic God determines the so-called miracle of childbirth, the Islamic Prophet Mohammad encouraged Muslim men to ejaculate inside their slave girls when they rape them because they believed the slave girls wouldn’t become pregnant unless the Abrahamic God willed it. If that isn’t horrifying enough, just imagine what members of the terrorist group ISIS does to Yazidi and Christian captives and what Pakistani and Afghan Muslims do to Hindu, Sikh, Parsis, Buddhist, and Christian minorities in Islamic countries when they target female children. I must reiterate that these are teachings that must be criticized:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 34, Hadith Number 432.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-34-sales-and-trade/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-034-hadith-number-432.
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith Number 137.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 May 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-62-wedlock-marriage-nikah/sahih-bukhari-volume-007-book-062-hadith-number-137.
Please consider comparing the so-called wisdom of the Islamic Prophet Mohammad with people from the past who you personally like or celebrate the philosophies of. Even if some of those people did benefit from or supported slavery, and they should be rightfully condemned for having done so, they aren’t celebrated as being beyond the ability to criticize and we can evaluate them from their positives and negatives. This is not allowed in Islam; everything the Islamic Prophet Mohammad does and advocates for has to be regarded as the actions of a perfect human being for Muslims and they believe nobody has the right to criticize their Prophet. To Muslims, does this teaching of the Islamic Prophet Mohammad sound like emancipation to you? Islam is a religion of submission and as such, all it can do is harm people:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 80, Hadith Number 753.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 2 June 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-80-laws-of-inheritence-al-faraaid/sahih-bukhari-volume-008-book-080-hadith-number-753.
The Islamic Prophet Mohammad’s own religious pulpit was built by slave labor:
al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 47, Hadith Number 743.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, SUNNAH.COM, Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-47-gifts/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-047-hadith-number-743.
The Prophet Mohammad himself participated in raping his sex slaves and the all-powerful Abrahamic God made sure to reveal that the Prophet Mohammad was fully permitted to rape his female sex slaves after his wives demanded that he say it was forbidden:
This infamous Quranic verse is what began the Youtuber Apostate Prophet’s journey to eventually leave Islam and it gives even more context on how the Prophet Mohammad treated his wives. In a holy book meant to solve all human problems to await Islamic Judgment Day, Quran 33:53 has the Abrahamic God explain that the Prophet Mohammad is shy, you should leave his house after a meal, that you should only ask his multiple wives questions from behind a curtain, and the Abrahamic God forbids marrying the Prophet Mohammad’s wives after he dies. The majority of Muslims believe this book can solve all human problems:
“53rd Verse of Chapter 33 (Sūrat l-Aḥzāb).” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, The Quranic Arabic Corpus, corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=33&verse=53. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
Finally, please read these three hadiths which are accounts of the Islamic Prophet Mohammad’s destruction of a Jewish tribe and the subsequent enslavement and then forced marriage of a Jewish woman, Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab. In these accounts, Safiya is taken to the illiterate and pedophilic warlord, the Prophet Mohammad, because of her beauty. The accounts explain that the Prophet Mohammad’s army slaughtered her entire tribe, killed all the men who surrendered, took the adult women and young female children as sex slaves, and the Prophet Mohammad had Safiya’s “release from slavery” be a coerced marriage to him and that was only after he was finished pondering whether to make her into one of his personal sex slaves or into one of his wives. This pedophilic, illiterate warlord is who Muslims must strive to emulate and revere as the perfect human being:
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-5/Book-59/Hadith-512/.
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-3/Book-34/Hadith-437/.
“QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-5/Book-59/Hadith-524/.
What did the Prophet Mohammad believe about the Earth?
Abdullah bin Abbas bin Abdul-Muttalib bin Hishim bin Abd Manaf Qurashi Hashimi also known as Ibn Abbas, a cousin of the Prophet Mohammad, who is known as the highest mufassir (interpreter of the Quran) who studied the Quran and Hadiths deeply[1], committing approximately 1,666 hadiths to memory[2], whose lived example is one of being intensely committed to the Prophet Mohammad personally since he was a child[3], and whose interpretations are recorded in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim; Ibn Abbas had the following to say about what the Prophet Mohammad believed about the shape of the earth[4]:
Source: Abbas, Ibn. “Tanwr Al-Miqbs Min Tafsr Ibn Abbs.” Translated by Mokrane Guezzou, Altafsir.Com, Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought, 2021, www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=68&tAyahNo=1&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2.
What am I lying about, exaggerating about, or taking out of context? All credible evidence from purely Islamic sources, and from Ibn Abbas who is the most respected mufassir, who was the Prophet Mohammad’s own cousin that served him with full-fledged loyalty in person, strongly suggests that this is what the Prophet Mohammad himself believed about the earth’s shape and how the earth exists. This is what Islamists fly planes into buildings, slaughter Hindus, slaughter Christians, slaughter Jains, slaughter Jews, slaughter Sikhs, slaughter Atheists, and slaughter Buddhists to demand respect for. This is what the US mainstream media has been shielding from criticism under the laughable claim that science and Abrahamic religion can co-exist. I recall examples such as the Muslim girl wearing a hijab talking about modern astrophysics in a Tedtalk, as if to suggest that an illiterate man from the 7th century was ever capable of the knowledge that she herself held about modern scientific discoveries. This is what they’ve spent all their time and energy in protecting; this is what internet mods on social media, and so many politically correct supporters shut down discussions to protect, knowing that Islamists kill innocent people over a Prophet who believed this about the shape of the earth itself.
Please think about this, because it is the unvarnished truth of why this is even controversial: this is the intellectual limits of a belief system built upon revealed wisdom. The only reason this is considered fake or controversial to the majority of Muslims is because they know this belief that the Prophet Mohammad held is demonstrably, provably wrong based upon modern scientific evidence. Yet, because Islam teaches them that the Prophet Mohammad revealed the truth to them, they substitute the historic fact that the Prophet Mohammad was a flat-earther who believed the world was atop a whale and then atop a bull in an endless ocean; they do this by trying to replace the context with a modern scientific lens, precisely because they’re not allowed to question the Quran. They try to use modern science to substitute this abjectly wrong belief system that can be proven wrong by simply reading the Quran or finding hadiths of the actual beliefs that the Prophet Mohammad held. The majority of Muslims ignore these historic facts about his beliefs to claim he had the same level of knowledge as the Ancient Greek philosophers that predate the Prophet Mohammad and the Ancient Hindu mathematicians like Aryabhata and Brahmagupta who existed around 476 – 668 CE which is before and after the Prophet Mohammad. The difference between the Prophet Mohammad and those philosophers and mathematicians is that the Prophet Mohammad was an illiterate man from the 7th century; whereas, the philosophers and mathematicians of the ancient world took the time to educate themselves, to study, and to learn because of the thrill of seeking knowledge. Even the belief that the Prophet Mohammad was a learned person for his time is wrong, precisely because he was illiterate. Those who cling to the tyranny of hurt sentiments will always seek to kill those who believe in truthseeking with their thirst for knowledge. The root cause of the tyranny of hurt sentiments is that their easy answers from revealed wisdom are proven false over and over. It is proven wrong by people who have the humility and the thrill to study and learn fact-finding research. By refusing to criticize Islam on a societal level, we are genuinely privileging illiteracy over literacy. Worst of all, we’re privileging their feelings over our human rights.
Chapter X: Islamism Always Creates Failed States
There is one simple reason why every single civilization that seeks Sharia and Islamic precepts as its main set of values within its legal system will be perennially doomed. To the degree and extent that such civilizations uphold Islamic values, they will become failed states and their perpetual doom should always be the expected outcome. This reason is so straightforward as to be doubtless to any thinking person and anyone denying this fact is lying to themselves. The basic fact is this: there is no single book that can answer all of life’s problems. Apply the Quran’s claims to any other book and that book would also fail. It doesn’t even matter whether the book is a religious book or not; I’m not insinuating that any Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, Jewish, or any other Dharmic or Abrahamic text would do better at all. I’m simply saying that no civilization can function and improve itself economically, socially, politically, and so on with a belief system around a single book. Imagine a world where we applied the Tafsir system of Islamic jurisprudence to the Founding Fathers of the United States. The current legal system of the US law has originalist and literalist interpretations wherein US judges interpret the laws based upon the Founders original intent or what the legal text literally states. Now, imagine if all claims of scientific inquiry had to be interpreted based upon whether Benjamin Franklin or George Washington would have found such scientific questions like quantum physics to be acceptable for the majority of Americans to believe. Obviously, that is asinine; it would limit the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Inquiry of US scientists, and it would be an abject waste of time and resources for something so absurd that it should rightly be viewed as pathetic and worthless. Yet, apply this to Islamic countries with the Quran set as the highest standard against the scientific evidence of human evolution, and you will have Muslims seriously argue that evolution cannot be true. Every single Islamic civilization that imposes Islam as a State religion that people cannot convert out of and that penalizes people for blasphemy against Islam, which is essentially penalizing people for thought crimes, are never going to remain a stable country for long without outside charity from other countries or international governmental organizations (IGOs) like the IMF and World Bank. Furthermore, there should be low expectations on returns of investment for the simple fact that no modern country in the world, especially after the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s, can possibly function under the preposterous claim that one book can answer all of life’s problems.
As another example, apply this logic to your average Math book; imagine there was a country in the world that decided an average math book was the necessary and unquestionable standard by which their Constitution could function. This math book might help with dosage for treatment of patients in hospitals, it may help with nutritional and dietary regulations to eat healthy, and perhaps even designing construction work for locales; but is it going to provide any answers to the questions of an abortion debate, how to rectify historic discrimination against an ethnic minority group, or questions pertaining to LGBT human rights? Most would find such a notion implausible and they would need other methods of reasoning outside the scope of that math book. Yet, Islam’s implicit claim under the Tafsir system is that an illiterate pedophile warlord from the 7th century narrated a book that can answer all of life’s problems for all-time. This would include the time after the Industrial revolution of the 1800s. Perpetual failed states are the only logical outcomes of this laughably stupid idea. In addition to this problem, the Quran itself is just 7th century tribal war book; the belief in the fantasy of a Messiah, the instructions on the proper enslavement and rape of women, the encouragement of massacring Jews and Pagans and Atheists, using an illiterate man as the moral standard to live by to the extent that you dress and act like him, and the belief in the fantasy of Judgment Day are simply proof of a primitive mentality in a warring-desert tribal cult. It may have worked in the Medieval period where barbarity wasn’t lacking in virtually all parts of the world, but it is never going to be able to answer any of the human challenges after the Industrial Revolution and it hasn’t been able to. If you live in an Islamic country whereby Islam is followed as the precepts of your society and the Quran can never be questioned, just expect your life to be one of perpetual failure that you laughably try to blame on everyone else instead of your own imbecilic political system that doomed your life. If you live in a non-Islamic country, you should peacefully protest to make sure that criticizing the pathetic and laughable claims of Islam are ensured in your society, because they’ll always act like an aggrieved minority when it’s really their idiotic belief systems causing them to suffer pointlessly. Where will that lead? Exactly as it has the Middle East and Pakistan. That is, a bunch of warring desert clans imitating their illiterate, pedophile warlord’s lunacy in the 7th century and perpetually blaming and killing each other in repeated examples of failed states that blame Hindus, the United States, the entire Western world, Atheism, Jews, Christians, Yazidis, and I’m sure numerous other scapegoats. Everything is a perpetual conspiracy theory in their minds and it is absolutely pathetic.
Here is the crux of the problem once you understand how Islamic theology actually functions: they’re deluding themselves with self-serving narratives of being a perennially aggrieved minority and degrading our societies into failed states just because they don’t like hearing criticism of their religious beliefs. The term Islamophobia allows this abject stupidity to go unchecked. Please think about this seriously, about what value these people actually provide the world around them: these are people who are literally using every iota of excuse to degrade societies into 7th century standards to create more failed states. They don’t value education because the Prophet Mohammad was illiterate and many say this explicitly. They don’t value scientific evidence for evolution, because they’re not allowed to question the Quran, per the Sharia and Tafsir system. They don’t want women to work because of Quran 4:34 teaching that men should maintain women and beat them when they become disobedient. And anytime they degrade a society, they blame that society instead of their beliefs that cause these problems like Sharia councils refusing a woman’s divorce or arresting women for criticizing misogyny in Islam.
What is the point of obtaining the support of moderate Muslims? Please consider this, what do these “moderate” Muslims do except claim everyone else is a bigot and that nobody has a right to an opinion on Islam? Everyone else is an Islamophobic bigot while the Islamists spread grooming gangs in England, everyone else is an Islamophobic bigot while Islamists shun French women from being allowed to shop in their stores because it’s against the Sharia, everyone else is an Islamophobic bigot for Quran burnings in Sweden while Islamists use children in their communities to firebomb cars and throw grenades at Swedish preschools, everyone else is an Islamophobic bigot while the vast majority of terrorist attacks that occur in India are from Islamists in India and Islamists take pride in killing as many Indians as possible, everyone else is an Islamophobic bigot while Islamists slaughter hundreds of African Christians who peacefully gave-up their guns under the demands of their respective governments, and no one has any right to criticize Islam despite all the rapes, murders, bombings, terrorism, and other forms of mass slaughter that the Islamists willfully do because that’s the moral example set by their illiterate, pedophile warlord of a Prophet. Not even after Charlie Hebdo, Samuel Paty, Kamlesh Tiwari, Kishin Bharwad, and numerous Bangladeshi freethinkers have been beheaded, stabbed, or shot to death. It has to be asked: what are we doing here? What standards are we internalizing and being forced to accept? They’re part of the problem specifically because they refuse to accept criticisms of Islam.
The primary reason Islam has more problems and a far greater propensity for violence is due to a theological issue beyond just the religion teaching its followers to try to imitate the Prophet Mohammad’s lived example as much as possible. The other religions had debates and collaborative efforts; whereas Islam just has a system that seeks to ascertain whether a single illiterate, pedophilic man from the 7th century would approve of people’s behavior in modern times. This does matter as it explains Islam’s propensity for violence more than anything; the only debates in Islam, if they can even be called debates, is verifying the authenticity of whether an illiterate pedophile warlord made a claim about something or said something specifically in order to accept a statement as absolute fact that cannot be questioned by Muslims. Hindus had debates for thousands of years over the question of truth. Jewish theologians are widely known to have debates on theology. Christianity, while more limited in trying to understand the will of Jesus Christ and not arguing against his explicit teachings, had debates on the question of divinity and debates on ascertaining what the Abrahamic God’s morals are. Buddhists, Hindus, and Jains engaged in debates with Atheists for hundreds of years. Islam’s debates were limited to a strict policy of anyone losing in wars or in supposed debates being given the threat of converting or dying. The noteworthy example in Medieval Iran has Muslim imams celebrating a Sultan sending a man to death for hurting their feelings. Islam’s historic debates never included atheists and sought to slaughter them as much as possible in Iran and almost certainly in India too. The Enlightenment in Western Europe slowly defanged Christianity of these impediments that were glorified thought crimes but it took more than a century to do it; yet, no such reduction or removal of the impediment of thought crimes is possible in Islam precisely because of its theological framework. The freedom to think and the freedom of conscience is fundamentally at odds with the belief in Divine Command theory. That is the core reason why the set of ideas in Islam cannot change, because it is premised upon unquestioned obedience over freedom of thought.
Religious beliefs need to stop being held as sacred; the collective social standard of keeping them sacred is killing humanity internally with excuse after excuse. Why? Because other religious people don’t want their sacred religious beliefs criticized, so they portray anyone criticizing Islam as a bigot to shield their own religious beliefs from criticism as a form of reciprocity. Most Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, and Hindus are open to having their beliefs challenged; the vast majority of Muslims around the world will kill you for challenging their beliefs. Why are we devaluing our human rights, our modern world and all its advantages and innovations, and wasting our time with shielding people from the truth about a 7th century fantasy novel? That’s really what we are doing here. The Quran is a 7th century fantasy novel, the Bible is a first-century fantasy novel, and Hindu texts have fantasy stories even more ancient than those two. We have climate change, AI innovations, quantum computing, raising standards of living across the world, and I’m sure a litany of other subjects to deal with; we cannot be wasting our time with a 7th century genocide cult that demands no one has a right to challenge their beliefs. We cannot be giving these people anything more than what they’re willing to reciprocate and we shouldn’t be lowering our standards because they feel uncomfortable hearing fact-finding research. I don’t want to live in a world where children get kidnapped and gang raped by Muslim grooming gangs and everyone turns a blind eye to the obvious just because of an unspoken agreement of refusing to criticize ancient people’s fantasy novels. Jesus Christ is not a Messiah, God does not exist, angels aren’t real, Satan does not exist, jinns do not exist, and raping 9-year olds is morally wrong by the standards of our modern society which we learned the hard way from thousands of years of trial-and-error learning from our ancestors’ mistakes. Fact matters more than fiction.
Words or Forever Wars
The numerous riots throughout India’s history due to Islamism attempting to infect it and the many riots growing in Europe over the threat of Islamism show that these problems aren’t going to go away. One fact should be made absolutely clear: shutting down criticism of Islam makes violence inevitable. If we don’t have the ability to speak our minds, to express our freedom of conscience, then all that’s left is violence. We cannot live in a world where Muslims and their useful idiots shut down conversations, while Islamists commit murders and attempted murders. That is insanity and it is an insanity that no one should be willing to tolerate. No children should have to worry about being raped by Muslim grooming gangs and no parents should need to seek forming community squads to hunt down Muslim pedophiles because the police refuse to hold Muslim rapists accountable. That is not a standard anyone should be forced to live with and it is not acceptable. It is not acceptable with how Native Americans continue to be mistreated similarly by bigoted US Federal laws imposed upon them unilaterally by the Oliphant vs Suquamish 1978 Supreme Court decision which continues to give predominately White male, registered sex offenders carte blanche access to Native American communities and it is not a standard that should be imposed upon anyone else either. Furthermore, any person seriously advocating for Sharia in any capacity needs to be thoroughly investigated for terrorism links in any country, because Sharia should be understood as synonymous with the enslavement and rape of 9-year old girls and other young girls.
Islamists are not going to stop killing people, the miniscule number of moderate Muslims will try to shut down criticisms of Islam, and they’re never going to stop trying to impose their deluded, 7th century cultural problems on everyone else who have higher IQs and far less incest than their societies. Many of these so-called moderate Muslims live in safe Western societies where they support the defeat of the US by the Taliban and support the impositions of Sharia upon women, which they know that they will never have to live with or deal with. We risk being bogged down into forever wars that’ll gradually decline us, but there is a way to avoid that. We no longer live in the Medieval world; we have methods, knowledge, and technology that can effectively end Islamism without firing a single shot, dropping a single bomb, and wasting taxpayer monies on violent methods that simply affirm their idiotic belief system. I don’t want to continue to live in a world where we turn a blind eye to ongoing drone bombings that kill an unknown number of Muslim civilian casualties like under President Obama. However, what that must mean is valuing people’s lives over their sacred religious beliefs. We live in a world with drones and drones can be effective in ending Islamism forever while minimizing Muslim civilian casualties to the greatest extent that is humanely possible. Earlier this year, I wrote the book called Machiavellian Ahimsa in which I advocate for a new use of drone warfare. I won’t go into the specifics here, but if you’re serious about ending Islamic terrorism within our lifetime and effectively ending all forms of Islamism in our lives, then I highly recommend reading that book. However, I am a born and raised US citizen and I do have a bias for the US. Therefore, depending on how serious you are about this issue, I recommend saving up enough to purchase the book, if you live outside of the United States and Western Europe. I do believe that the methods mentioned in that book could almost certainly help any country or any well-organized mercenary with capable drone technology to conquer vast swathes of land in Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Africa, and the Middle East so long as they have a steady supply of cheap and affordable drone technology at their disposal.
Free Speech is the ultimate form of non-violence. The Charvaka atheists flourished in ancient India approximately around 600 BCE because of it, Sultans that ruthlessly ruled Medieval Iran were afraid of the Zandiks ability to end Islamic rule because of it and so persecuted them mercilessly, the Enlightenment of Western Europe flourished because of it, and the US has dominated and expanded in countless human innovations for nearly 250 years precisely because of Free Speech. Imagine if Canada’s recent proposals for jailing people for Free Speech happens because Muslims get offended; are scientists doing important work going to need to flee to the United States to avoid a five-year prison sentence for making online tweets about the Prophet Mohammad that Muslims get offended by? Should we expect scientific research to get cancelled because a particular scientist doesn’t have thorough knowledge of what they can or cannot say in order to avoid offending a bunch of 7th century fundamentalists who always play victimhood? None of these places or people can have such freedoms when there’s a group of perpetually offended 7th century fundamentalists refusing to change their ways or accept the modern world. Think about how absolutely stupid that is too. No one else acts as offended over pictures or words as Muslims; it is not a White versus ethnic minority issue. It’s a modern world versus Islam issue and it always has been, because Islam was never a race and never will be one. It is either perpetual wars against an ideology that creates global terrorism when left unchallenged from criticism, or normalizing criticism everywhere, including India and the Middle East, so that the US, India, Western Europe, and even the Middle East itself no longer have to deal with a never-ending strain of terrorist bombings, terrorist shootings, mass murder, ethnic cleansings, violent coups, and violence against women and atheists on a scope and scale that is only comparable to Christianity’s violence against Jews, the people of India, Black people across the world, Tasmanian Aboriginals, the Irish, the Boers, numerous Indigenous European people, and Native Americans. I don’t want to live in a world where we’re so afraid of offending feelings, even as bomb blasts explode at a runners marathon such as during the Boston Bombings of 2013 in the US, or mothers are forcibly conditioned to be nice to people throwing hand grenades at preschools that nearly kill their children such as in Sweden, or Islamic terrorism’s intentional mass murders of civilians being treated as seasonal weather patterns in India by the US corporate news media. You should absolutely expect more violent riots like the British riots of 2024 or the so-called “communal” riots in India over Islamic violence. Our choices were never Free Speech helping supposed bigots versus protecting Muslims from bigotry, that is honestly just 7th century conspiratorial thinking. Our choices have only been that we value Free Speech to reduce Islamic terrorism and end it within our lifetimes through peaceful criticisms and the freedom to question Islam’s theology or we lay down and allow them to slowly kill or convert us all because Islamic terrorism is never going to stop unless Muslims hear and experience arguments about why Islam is simply wrong. Either truth triumphs over all or Islamic terrorism remains unchecked as it kills innocent civilians including children. Either free inquiry is indulged as a natural human right per the First Amendment of the US and the arguments of Thomas Jefferson, or the US gets bogged and degraded with too much debt to finance forever wars just as the Islamic terrorists have sought to do and gradually been succeeding in such a goal. Our choices will always come to either Free Speech is maintained as a standard for Free Inquiry to flourish or we live with the fear of Islamic violence for the rest of our lives. If we keep choosing the latter, then we pay the price in both lives and taxes for diminishing returns. We all must hold to a new standard and openly criticize all religion, if that’s what it takes. Human lives must be held as far more valuable above feeling offended about criticisms of ancient mythology.
Chapter 9
- Abbas, Ibn. “Tanwr Al-Miqbs Min Tafsr Ibn Abbs.” Translated by Mokrane Guezzou, Altafsir.Com, Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought, 2021, www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=68&tAyahNo=1&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2.
- “Abu Dawud Book 033, Hadith Number 4450.” Hadith Collection, https://hadithcollection.com/abudawud/abu-dawud-book-33-prescribed-punishments/abu-dawud-book-033-hadith-number-4450.
- Andrews, Robin. “We Finally Know Why People Are Left- Or Right-Handed.” IFLScience, IFLScience, 23 Jan. 2019, www.iflscience.com/brain/finally-know-people-left-righthanded/.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 3, Hadith Number 97a.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 8 Dec. 2021, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-03-knowledge/sahih-bukhari-volume-001-book-003-hadith-number-097a.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 34, Hadith Number 351.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-34-sales-and-trade/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-034-hadith-number-351.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 34, Hadith Number 432.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-34-sales-and-trade/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-034-hadith-number-432.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 41, Hadith Number 598.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-41-loans-payment-of-loans-freezing-of-property-bankruptcy/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-041-hadith-number-598.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 47, Hadith Number 743.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, SUNNAH.COM, Jan. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-47-gifts/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-047-hadith-number-743.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 47, Hadith Number 765.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-47-gifts/sahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-047-hadith-number-765.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Hadith Number 255.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 7 Feb. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-52-fighting-for-the-cause-of-allah-jihaad/sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-052-hadith-number-255.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Hadith Number 641.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 26 Apr. 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-55-prophets/sahih-bukhari-volume-004-book-055-hadith-number-641.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith Number 137.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 31 May 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-62-wedlock-marriage-nikah/sahih-bukhari-volume-007-book-062-hadith-number-137.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 80, Hadith Number 753.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 2 June 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-80-laws-of-inheritence-al-faraaid/sahih-bukhari-volume-008-book-080-hadith-number-753.
- al-Bukhārī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī. “Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Hadith Number 124.” Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 6 June 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/sahih-bukhari-book-87-interpretation-of-dreams/sahih-bukhari-volume-009-book-087-hadith-number-124.
- Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
- “Al-Qur’an Al-Kareem – القرآن الكريم.” Surah Al-Waqi’ah [56:35-38], quran.com/56/35-38.
- “Al-Qur’an Al-Kareem – القرآن الكريم.” Surah An-Naba [78:31-40], quran.com/78/31-40.
- al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd (Dā’ūd) Sulaymān ibn al-Ash‘ath ibn Isḥāq al-Azdī. “40 Prescribed Punishments (Kitab Al-Hudud): (30) Chapter: One Who Has Intercourse with an Animal.” Edited by Abu Khaliyl. Translated by Nasiruddin Al-Khattab, Sunan Abi Dawud 4465 – Prescribed Punishments (Kitab al-Hudud) – كتاب الحدود – Sunnah.Com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), SUNNAH.COM, sunnah.com/abudawud:4465. Accessed 8 Aug. 2025.
- Al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd (Dā’ūd) Sulaymān ibn al-Ash‘ath ibn Isḥāq Al-Azdī. “The Book Of Legal Punishments: Chapter 29. One Who Has Intercourse With An Animal.” Sunan Abu Dawud Compiled by: Imâm Hâfiz Abu Dawud Sulaiman Bin Ash’ath , edited by Abdul Malik Mujahid et al., translated by Nasiruddin Al-Khattab, First Edition ed., Volume 5, DARU SSALAM GLOBAL LEADER IN ISLAMIC BOOKS, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, 2008, pp. 80–80. From Hadtth No, 4351 to 5274 , https://ia601602.us.archive.org/34/items/SunanAbuDawudVol.111160EnglishArabic/Sunan%20Abu%20Dawud%20Vol.%205%20-%204351-5274%20English%20Arabic.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug. 2025.
- an-Naysābūrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj ibn Muslim ibn Ward al-Qushayrī. “Sahih Muslim Book 1, Hadith Number 244.” Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 9 June 2009, https://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-01-faith/sahih-muslim-book-001-hadith-number-0244.
- an-Naysābūrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj ibn Muslim ibn Ward al-Qushayrī. “Sahih Muslim Book 15, Hadith Number 4112.” Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Hadith Collection, Hadith Collection, 1 July 2009, hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-15-oath/sahih-muslim-book-015-hadith-number-4112.
- “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
- Aydemir, Ridvan. “All The Things That Satan Does (Ridiculous Islamic Teachings).” YouTube, Apostate Prophet, 28 Dec. 2018, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko2lttV8i2M&feature=youtu.be.
- Aydemir, Ridvan. “Cowards in Control.” YouTube, Apostate Prophet, 25 May 2019, www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q5ZKANKaMQ.
- Aydemir, Ridvan. YouTube, Apostate Prophet, www.youtube.com/channel/UCzREuchzOqiawpEpvEM0Tyg/videos.
- Beckwith, Christopher I. Greek Buddha: Pyrrhos Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. PDF ed., Princeton University Press, 2017. Princeton University Press, assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10500.pdf.
- “53rd Verse of Chapter 33 (Sūrat l-Aḥzāb).” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, The Quranic Arabic Corpus, corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=33&verse=53. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
- Ghose, Sanujit. “Cultural Links between India & the Greco-Roman World.” Ancient History Encyclopedia, Ancient History Encyclopedia, 30 Apr. 2019, www.ancient.eu/article/208/cultural-links-between-india–the-greco-roman-worl/.
- Hadith – Book of Prophets – Sahih Al-Bukhari – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/bukhari/60/73.
- “Hadith – Chapters on the Description of Paradise – Jami` at-Tirmidhi – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم).” Riyad as-Salihin – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), www.sunnah.com/urn/678680.
- Hadith – Establishing the Prayer and the Sunnah Regarding Them – Sunan Ibn Majah – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/urn/1281560.
- “Hadith – Hudud – Bulugh Al-Maram – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم).” Search Results – Fitra (Page 1) – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/urn/2015030.
- Hadith – The Book of Clothes and Adornment – Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/muslim/37/159.
- Hadith – The Book of Faith – Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/muslim/1/253.
- Hadith – The Book of Purification – Bulugh Al-Maram – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/bulugh/1/169.
- Hadith – The Book of Virtues – Riyad as-Salihin – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/riyadussaliheen/9/102.
- “Hadith – Zuhd – Sunan Ibn Majah – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم).” Sahih Muslim – Sunnah.com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), sunnah.com/urn/1294400.
- Haider, Sarah. “Even as a Child, This Eid Was Horrifying. I Remember Witnessing a Sacrifice of a Cow with My Family, I Remember the Blood Gushing from Its Throat and Running through the Street. The Story of Abraham Which It Commemorates Is Another Horror. I’ll Save My Mubaraks for the Other Eid.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1031995695652384769.
- Haider, Sarah. “I Remember the Son of the Butcher We Hired Playing in the Blood, like a Rain Puddle.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1031996570470940673.
- Hasan, Ahmad. “Game (Kitab Al-Said).” Family Life in Islam, International Islamic University Malaysia, www.iium.edu.my/deed/hadith/abudawood/010_sat.html.
- Kean, Thomas H., et al. The 9/11 Commission Report, First ed., W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY, 2004, pp. 14–14.
- Mardanfarrox. “Can a Man Screw His Own Donkey Simply Because He Owns It?” The Definitive Zoroastrian Critique of Islam: Chapters 11 –12 of the Skand Gumanig-Wizar by Mardanfarrox Son of Ohrmazddad, translated by Christian C. Sahner, Paperback ed., Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, Merseyside, 2023, pp. 147–148.
- Mo, Bilaal. “I Remember the Wrath on the Slaughterer’s Faces Too, and Blood Stained Hands and Kurta’s Afterwards. The Whole Thing Was Creepy.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/takebeerism/status/1031996242685906945.
- Mo, Bilaal. “We Used to Joke around That the Reason We Fasted the Day or Two before This Eid Was to Avoid Throwing up. Fortunately i Wasn’t in That World Long Enough to Become Desensitised to It.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/takebeerism/status/1031997399969947649.
- Mosaad, Walead, et al. “Sayyiduna ’Abdullah Ibn ’Abbas: A Biography.” Imam Ghazali Institute, Imam Ghazali Institute, 2007, www.imamghazali.org/resources/abdullah-ibn-abbas-biography#:~:text=Another%20narration%20attributed%20to%20him,in%20the%20year%2071%20AH.
- “Pakistani Hindus Complain of Forced Conversion of Teenage Girls.” YouTube, VOA News, 18 Mar. 2016, youtu.be/-i24jg4mJ4I.
- “Poor Goat.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=008_1443844876.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-2/Book-21/Hadith-245/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-3/Book-34/Hadith-437/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-4/Book-54/Hadith-491/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-4/Book-54/Hadith-493/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-4/Book-54/Hadith-522/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-5/Book-59/Hadith-512/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-5/Book-59/Hadith-524/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Bukhari Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-8/Book-73/Hadith-242/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Muwatta Malik Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Malik/USC-MSA/Book-49/Hadith-6/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-2/Hadith-462/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-8/Hadith-3240/.
- “QuranX.com The Most Complete Quran / Hadith / Tafsir Collection Available!” Sahih Muslim Hadiths, quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/USC-MSA/Book-23/Hadith-5046/.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 11 Hadith Number 582.” Muflihun, https://web.archive.org/web/20200920140329/muflihun.com/bukhari/11/582.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 34 Hadith Number 351.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/34/351.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 34 Hadith Number 432.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/34/432.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 38 Hadith Number 505.” Muflihun, https://web.archive.org/web/20210208235810/muflihun.com/bukhari/38/505.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 41 Hadith Number 598.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/41/598.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 47 Hadith Number 743.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/47/743.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 47 Hadith Number 765.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/47/765.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 52 Hadith Number 255.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/52/255.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 55 Hadith Number 641.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/55/641.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 62 Hadith Number 137.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/62/137.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 80 Hadith Number 753.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/80/753.
- “Sahih Al-Bukhari Book Number 87 Hadith Number 124.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/bukhari/87/124.
- “Sahih Muslim Book Number 1 Hadith Number 244.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/muslim/1/244
- “Sahih Muslim Book Number 15 Hadith Number 4112.” Muflihun, muflihun.com/muslim/15/4112.
- “Sahih Muslim Book 024, Hadith Number 5246.” Hadith Collection, https://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-24-clothes-and-decorations/sahih-muslim-book-024-hadith-number-5246
- “Sahih Muslim Book 024, Hadith Number 5248.” Hadith Collection, https://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/sahih-muslim-book-24-clothes-and-decorations/sahih-muslim-book-024-hadith-number-5248.
- Sarkeesian, Anita. “Women as Reward – Tropes vs Women in Video Games.” YouTube, Feminist Frequency, 31 Aug. 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC6oxBLXtkU.
- “Short Biography of Abdullah Ibn Abbas (R.A.).” IslamicFinder, Athan Academy, 2023, www.islamicfinder.org/knowledge/biography/story-of-abdullah-ibn-abbas/.
- Sommerlad, Joe. “Why Do Muslims Sacrifice Animals during Eid?” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 21 Aug. 2018, www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/eid-al-adha-animal-sacrifice-abraham-islam-muslims-goats-sheep-animal-rights-a8500556.html.
- “Surat An-Naba’ (the Tidings) – سورة النبإ.” The Noble Qur’an, legacy.quran.com/78/31-40. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
- “Surat Al-Wāqi`ah (the Inevitable) – سورة الواقعة.” The Noble Qur’an, legacy.quran.com/56/35-40. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025.
- “Tafseer on the Basis of Narrated Texts and Tafseer on the Basis of Individual Understanding – Islam Question & Answer.” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, 11 Mar. 2015, islamqa.info/en/answers/205290/tafseer-on-the-basis-of-narrated-texts-and-tafseer-on-the-basis-of-individual-understanding.
- “36 The Book of the Kind Treatment of Women: (4) Chapter: Jealousy.” Sunan An-Nasa’i 3959 – the Book of the Kind Treatment of Women – كتاب عشرة النساء – Sunnah.Com – Sayings and Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه و سلم), SUNNAH.COM, sunnah.com/nasai:3959. Accessed 6 Aug. 2025. Grade: Sahih (Darussalam) Reference: Sunan an-Nasa’i 3959 In-book reference: Book 36, Hadith 21 English translation: Vol. 4, Book 36, Hadith 3411
- “The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran.” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=24
- “The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran.” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34
- “The Reason Why the Right Hand Is Preferred over the Left – Islam Question & Answer.” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, 2 Mar. 2007, islamqa.info/en/answers/82120/the-reason-why-the-right-hand-is-preferred-over-the-left.
- “The Udhiyah (the Sacrificial Animal) and Its Rulings.” Islamway, Islamway, 29 Nov. 2012, en.islamway.net/article/12915/the-udhiyah-the-sacrificial-animal-and-its-rulings.
- “Two Pai Taliban Jihadi Mujahideen Caught Sexing A Donkey By US Forces.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=825_1315923588.
- “US ARMY Camera Catches Afghans Gangbanging a Goat.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=93d_1384239379.
- Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein. Chapter 3: The Fire Extinguished (Location 1241 – 1798). Two Centuries of Silence: An Account of Events and Conditions in Iran [Persia] During the First Two Hundred Years of Islam, from the Arab Invasion to the Rise of the Tahirid Dynasty First edition. Mazda Publishers. Kindle Edition.
- Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein. Chapter 4: The Lost Language (Location 1833 – 1878). Two Centuries of Silence: An Account of Events and Conditions in Iran [Persia] During the First Two Hundred Years of Islam, from the Arab Invasion to the Rise of the Tahirid Dynasty First edition. Mazda Publishers. Kindle Edition.
- Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein. Chapter 9: The Battle of Beliefs (Location 4422 – 4965). Two Centuries of Silence: An Account of Events and Conditions in Iran [Persia] During the First Two Hundred Years of Islam, from the Arab Invasion to the Rise of the Tahirid Dynasty First edition. Mazda Publishers. Kindle Edition.
Endnotes
[1] Mosaad, Walead, et al. “Sayyiduna ’Abdullah Ibn ’Abbas: A Biography.” Imam Ghazali Institute, Imam Ghazali Institute, 2007, www.imamghazali.org/resources/abdullah-ibn-abbas-biography#:~:text=Another%20narration%20attributed%20to%20him,in%20the%20year%2071%20AH.
[2] “Short Biography of Abdullah Ibn Abbas (R.A.).” IslamicFinder, Athan Academy, 2023, www.islamicfinder.org/knowledge/biography/story-of-abdullah-ibn-abbas/.
[3] “Short Biography of Abdullah Ibn Abbas (R.A.).” IslamicFinder, Athan Academy, 2023, www.islamicfinder.org/knowledge/biography/story-of-abdullah-ibn-abbas/.
[4] “Short Biography of Abdullah Ibn Abbas (R.A.).” IslamicFinder, Athan Academy, 2023, www.islamicfinder.org/knowledge/biography/story-of-abdullah-ibn-abbas/.
[1] “The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran.” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=24
[2] “Pakistani Hindus Complain of Forced Conversion of Teenage Girls.” YouTube, VOA News, 18 Mar. 2016, youtu.be/-i24jg4mJ4I.
[3] “The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Word by Word Grammar, Syntax and Morphology of the Holy Quran.” The Quranic Arabic Corpus – Translation, http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=34
[1] Andrews, Robin. “We Finally Know Why People Are Left- Or Right-Handed.” IFLScience, IFLScience, 23 Jan. 2019, http://www.iflscience.com/brain/finally-know-people-left-righthanded/.
[2] Andrews, Robin. “We Finally Know Why People Are Left- Or Right-Handed.” IFLScience, IFLScience, 23 Jan. 2019, http://www.iflscience.com/brain/finally-know-people-left-righthanded/.
[1] Aydemir, Ridvan. “All The Things That Satan Does (Ridiculous Islamic Teachings).” YouTube, Apostate Prophet, 28 Dec. 2018, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko2lttV8i2M&feature=youtu.be.
[2] Aydemir, Ridvan. YouTube, Apostate Prophet, http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzREuchzOqiawpEpvEM0Tyg/videos.
[3] Aydemir, Ridvan. “All The Things That Satan Does (Ridiculous Islamic Teachings).” YouTube, Apostate Prophet, 28 Dec. 2018, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko2lttV8i2M&feature=youtu.be.
[4] Aydemir, Ridvan. YouTube, Apostate Prophet, http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzREuchzOqiawpEpvEM0Tyg/videos.
[5] Aydemir, Ridvan. “Cowards in Control.” YouTube, Apostate Prophet, 25 May 2019, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q5ZKANKaMQ.
[1] Sarkeesian, Anita. “Women as Reward – Tropes vs Women in Video Games.” YouTube, Feminist Frequency, 31 Aug. 2015, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC6oxBLXtkU.
[2] Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
[3] Sarkeesian, Anita. “Women as Reward – Tropes vs Women in Video Games.” YouTube, Feminist Frequency, 31 Aug. 2015, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC6oxBLXtkU.
[4] Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
[5] Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
[1] Mardanfarrox. “Can a Man Screw His Own Donkey Simply Because He Owns It?” The Definitive Zoroastrian Critique of Islam: Chapters 11 –12 of the Skand Gumanig-Wizar by Mardanfarrox Son of Ohrmazddad, translated by Christian C. Sahner, Paperback ed., Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, Merseyside, 2023, pp. 147–148.
[2] Ghose, Sanujit. “Cultural Links between India & the Greco-Roman World.” Ancient History Encyclopedia, Ancient History Encyclopedia, 30 Apr. 2019, www.ancient.eu/article/208/cultural-links-between-india–the-greco-roman-worl/.
[3] Beckwith, Christopher I. Greek Buddha: Pyrrhos Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. PDF ed., Princeton University Press, 2017. Princeton University Press, assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10500.pdf.
[4] Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
[5] Al-Munajjid, Muhammed Salih. “Will Men in Paradise Have Intercourse with Al-Hoor Aliyn?” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, islamqa.info/en/10053.
[6] “Al-Qur’an Al-Kareem – القرآن الكريم.” Surah Al-Waqi’ah [56:35-38], quran.com/56/35-38.
[7] “Al-Qur’an Al-Kareem – القرآن الكريم.” Surah An-Naba [78:31-40], quran.com/78/31-40.
[1] Haider, Sarah. “Even as a Child, This Eid Was Horrifying. I Remember Witnessing a Sacrifice of a Cow with My Family, I Remember the Blood Gushing from Its Throat and Running through the Street. The Story of Abraham Which It Commemorates Is Another Horror. I’ll Save My Mubaraks for the Other Eid.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1031995695652384769.
[2] Haider, Sarah. “Even as a Child, This Eid Was Horrifying. I Remember Witnessing a Sacrifice of a Cow with My Family, I Remember the Blood Gushing from Its Throat and Running through the Street. The Story of Abraham Which It Commemorates Is Another Horror. I’ll Save My Mubaraks for the Other Eid.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1031995695652384769.
[3] Mo, Bilaal. “I Remember the Wrath on the Slaughterer’s Faces Too, and Blood Stained Hands and Kurta’s Afterwards. The Whole Thing Was Creepy.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/takebeerism/status/1031996242685906945.
[4] Haider, Sarah. “I Remember the Son of the Butcher We Hired Playing in the Blood, like a Rain Puddle.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1031996570470940673.
[5] Mo, Bilaal. “We Used to Joke around That the Reason We Fasted the Day or Two before This Eid Was to Avoid Throwing up. Fortunately i Wasn’t in That World Long Enough to Become Desensitised to It.” Twitter, Twitter, 21 Aug. 2018, twitter.com/takebeerism/status/1031997399969947649.
[6] Sommerlad, Joe. “Why Do Muslims Sacrifice Animals during Eid?” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 21 Aug. 2018, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/eid-al-adha-animal-sacrifice-abraham-islam-muslims-goats-sheep-animal-rights-a8500556.html.
[7] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[8] “The Udhiyah (the Sacrificial Animal) and Its Rulings.” Islamway, Islamway, 29 Nov. 2012, en.islamway.net/article/12915/the-udhiyah-the-sacrificial-animal-and-its-rulings.
[9] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[10] “The Udhiyah (the Sacrificial Animal) and Its Rulings.” Islamway, Islamway, 29 Nov. 2012, en.islamway.net/article/12915/the-udhiyah-the-sacrificial-animal-and-its-rulings.
[11] “Tafseer on the Basis of Narrated Texts and Tafseer on the Basis of Individual Understanding – Islam Question & Answer.” Islamqa.info, Islam Question and Answer, 11 Mar. 2015, islamqa.info/en/answers/205290/tafseer-on-the-basis-of-narrated-texts-and-tafseer-on-the-basis-of-individual-understanding.
[12] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[13] Sommerlad, Joe. “Why Do Muslims Sacrifice Animals during Eid?” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 21 Aug. 2018, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/eid-al-adha-animal-sacrifice-abraham-islam-muslims-goats-sheep-animal-rights-a8500556.html.
[14] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[15] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[16] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[17] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[18] “As Eid Al Adha Approaches…” Questions on Islam, questionsonislam.com/content/eid-al-adha-approaches…
[19] “Poor Goat.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=008_1443844876.
[20] “Two Pai Taliban Jihadi Mujahideen Caught Sexing A Donkey By US Forces.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=825_1315923588.
[21] “US ARMY Camera Catches Afghans Gangbanging a Goat.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, www.liveleak.com/view?i=93d_1384239379.
[22] “Two Pai Taliban Jihadi Mujahideen Caught Sexing A Donkey By US Forces.” LiveLeak.com – Redefining the Media, http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=825_1315923588.
[1] Kean, Thomas H., et al. The 9/11 Commission Report, First ed., W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, NY, 2004, pp. 14–14.
Discover more from Jarin Jove's Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pingback: Part 1 of A Hindu Critiques Islam: Doctrinal Failings of Islam, Advaita Vedanta and Samkhya Critique of Islam, and What the Term Islamophobia Shields | Jarin Jove's Blog
Pingback: Part 6 of A Hindu Critiques Islam: Chapter VIII: The Partition of Free Speech | Jarin Jove's Blog
Pingback: Part 4 of A Hindu Critiques Islam: Chapter VI: Did the British Partition of 1947 Gradually Decline the UK and Bolster India? | Jarin Jove's Blog
Pingback: Part 5 of A Hindu Critiques Islam: Chapter VII: Islamic Terrorism’s First-Generation was Al Qaeda, Second-Generation was ISIS, and a Third-Generation’s making a Digital Caliphate from “Islamophobia” Censorship | Jarin Jove's Blog
Pingback: Part 3 of A Hindu Critiques Islam: Chapter V: Neoliberalism Empowers Islamism | Jarin Jove's Blog