All of this is based upon my research to the best of my ability into Benjamin Netanyahu based upon my own research in reading Haaretz, Times of Israel, Netanyahu’s personal interviews and research done by corporate news media like the NY Times and the Washington Post, and my own observation of the known facts of both of his behavior and analyses back when it was more open to research and criticize him. I followed Netanyahu on and off from 2017 onwards, because – and I apologize for how dumb this sounds – he seemed really cool up until what happened to Gaza in 2023 onwards. Insofar as why I thought he was cool, back then the Ex-Muslim movement had convinced me that Islam had serious issues and during the time I was disturbed to learn that what contemporary Muslims had claimed to be a conspiracy about the historical mass genocides of approximately between 60 – 80 million people in Medieval India by Islamic conquests; it turned out to be the unvarnished historical truth and it made me seriously distrust anything said by Islamic organizations because they’d so brazenly lied or – in Ex-Muslim Atheist cases – laughed at the mass death toll of mostly Hindus in history and most Muslims continue to refuse to engage in criticisms of Islam. I had felt a deep sense of betrayal, because I had wrongly given Western Religious Studies departments more credibility than they deserved when it was Hindutva groups of India telling me the truth all along about the historical facts of our own history. Reading up on Netanyahu is what got me into reading the one of the works of Historian, Will Durant, in 2018 where I learned the truth and then I investigated even further as of last year. I had read Machiavelli half-way up to that point and then decided to finish it after reading more on Netanyahu’s background and analyses of his realpolitik by journalist and historian, David Brooks. Nevertheless, I can only give my opinions based upon Netanyahu’s personal interviews reported in the Washington Post, analyses by the NY Times, and critiques in Israel and comparing that to his actions which follow specific philosophical viewpoints from philosophers that he’s claimed to read. I might read further into him from his book and his brother’s posthumously published letters. I try to separate my feelings when I do a critical analysis to the best that I can, but more than that . . . I can’t help but notice this man’s unfettered brilliance and I’m genuinely surprised that nobody else notices it. Up until Donald Trump effectively declaring Benjamin Netanyahu the King of America with the sanctions on the ICC, I had thought I was imagining it. Observing Christian Americans fall into Anti-Semitic tropes made me realize that it was in the best interests of my fellow Americans who are Jewish, if I share my critique of Netanyahu so that it lessens anyone acting in ignorance and harming Jewish Americans. The best I can surmise is that the Bible is more of an impediment to the average Christian’s ability for critical thinking than they consciously recognize, because they confuse Netanyahu’s modernized style of Machiavellian politics for some sort of demonic nature among Jewish people. I can’t say I’m a fan of his anymore, because I strongly condemn all human rights injustices like the genocide of Gaza but he’s going to be known as having defined this era of human history after all of us have passed away. We are in the Netanyahu Era of Western history; Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Donald J. Trump will not be remembered after the US Boomers pass away. At best, they’ll have brief footnotes. Only Benjamin Netanyahu and Jeffrey Epstein will be remembered in this period of American history by younger generations.

My claims of Benjamin Netanyahu being an atheist may seem too out of the norm to believe. It’s also plausible that he’ll just lie and say he believes in God within a future interview, but we have ample evidence from his personal interviews dating back to 1997 with Laura Blumenfeld at the Washington Post that this is not true (1). Laura Blumenfeld’s erroneous characterization of Netanyahu in her article shows that she either didn’t recognize the significance of what she revealed or intentionally tried to mislead her readership; I’m betting on the former due to her incompetence in attempting some bizarre form of “revenge-based journalism” upon Palestinians according to her own admission on personal projects she’s conducted (1). In general, she doesn’t seem very bright because she couldn’t comprehend that a Prime Minister like Benjamin Netanyahu, whose father is a well-respected historian and who has read multiple philosophers in his youth to learn assiduously from them, was a deep thinker. Think about how few, if any, people in general read deeply into philosophy and have a military service background like Benjamin Netanyahu. The Washington Post must’ve intentionally picked this woman knowing how dumb she is, so that Benjamin Netanyahu could make his appeal to the broader US public without revealing too much of his cunning intellect:

“An older brother is a like a surrogate parent,” Netanyahu says. To each other, they were Bibi and Yoni. “The little ducklings, and he’s the big duckling.”

Bibi waddled after Yoni from the day he could walk, scouting the fields near their home in Jerusalem, hunting for ladybugs and turtles, learning the names of poppies and cyclamen and tulips. And later, learning what to read — Plato, Ayn Rand, Nietzsche and Poe.

During high school, the Netanyahus lived near Philadelphia, where their father, a historian, taught at Dropsie College.

“How tall are you? How do you look? Send me a color photo,” Yoni wrote, like a doting mother, in a letter to Bibi from summer camp in 1963. When Bibi enlisted in the Israeli army, he rose to the rank of captain. Later, he recruited his older brother to join his anti-terrorism unit, the elite force that raided Entebbe.

The brothers were intense, ambitious and insular. “I miss you terribly,” Yoni wrote during one of their army separations. “I didn’t miss anyone at home as much as I missed you. I think the reason may be that you’re the only true friend I ever had and the fact that I think I reached a perfect understanding with you.”

Yoni confided to his girlfriend, in a letter about Bibi: “I love him more than anyone else in the world.” No matter that Bibi sometimes neglected to write. “Bibi exists and that {is} enough for me.”

Bibi believes Yoni could never have made it in the world of politics because of his idealism.

The prime minister is a creature of the surface, a smooth-talking — critics say shallow — lily-pad politician. His sentences skitter like flat stones across an issue. Usually, he welcomes interviews. But answering questions about his brother, Bibi stumbles. He reaches, again and again, for the tray of danishes behind him. He checks his watch and rattles his knees. The words for Yoni are stored at a different level, sunken, somewhere safe, below the surface.

Often, in his prime minister’s office, Netanyahu will take a break from his duties, and pull down from his shelf a collection of Yoni’s letters. He keeps them behind his desk, with a dozen books about his brother’s last mission. Bibi will page through the words his brother wrote at Harvard while listening to Brahms, or in the field under a halo of mosquitoes.

“It makes me feel . . .” Netanyahu chokes and gropes for the word. ” . . . deeply.”

Moreover, the published letters from his brother Yonatan which he keeps with him and occasionally reads in his own personal time have clear references to Nietzschean philosophy.  Karen Wolfers Rapaport Alamayo who is an Israeli educator, therapist, writer, and licensed tour guide; who also listed that she’s worked for the Office of the Prime Minister; wrote an article titled “The Letters of Yoni Netanyahu” on May 10^th, 2016 which has the following quote from Yonatan, which Benjamin Netanyahu undoubtedly keeps close to him in memory of his beloved elder brother (1):

Here, in his own words, are some excerpts from letters Yoni had written from the film, Follow Me: The Yoni Netanyahu story.

(May 23, 1963)

Man does not live forever.  He should put the days of his life to the best possible use. How to do this I can’t tell you.  I only know that I don’t want to reach a certain age, look around me and suddenly discover that I’ve created nothing.  I must feel certain that, not only at the moment of my death shall I be able to account for the time I have lived, I ought to be ready at every moment of my life to confront myself and say—this is what I’ve done.

This is a quote from Yonatan Netanyahu that is clearly paraphrasing Nietzschean philosophy. Yet still, this might be confusing to people unfamiliar with the specific brand of atheism that Netanyahu follows and has followed throughout his entire life. It’s important to note what Atheism is from what it is not before going forward. New Atheist author, Sam Harris, summarizes is succinctly and to paraphrase him: atheism itself is a non-belief and not a specific set of ideas. An atheist is just someone who doesn’t believe in a God or the supernatural and that’s it. Netanyahu isn’t a Marxist atheist, which is what most Christian Americans appear to be familiar with. Netanyahu seems neutral to science and scientific inquiry, it’s not a major concern of his worldview and so atheists who value science like Sam Harris don’t fit his specific brand of atheism. Netanyahu is not a Secular Humanist as can be proven by his genocide of Gaza and he never claimed to be one. He couldn’t care less about any humanist values. Netanyahu could be considered a cultural Jew or Zionist Atheist, but this doesn’t fit his entire modus operandi or explain the full breadth of his philosophy. That would be too limiting a perspective on Benjamin Netanyahu’s brilliance. Benjamin Netanyahu is an atheist who primarily follows a mix of Western philosophies: Machiavelli appears to be his main philosopher more than the others. Despite Nietzsche clearly being a valuable inspiration, Machiavelli is who he follows as a Statesman and he proves it by his actions. Nietzsche, Will Durant, and Plato follow soon after. Journalist and historian David Brooks in his January 1^st, 2015 opinion article in the NY Times titled “The Age of Bibi” (1) offered a glimpse at Netanyahu’s political acumen and how Netanyahu typifies Machiavelli above all else:

Finally, the story would be part Machiavelli. The great Renaissance philosopher argued that it is best to be both loved and feared, but if you have to choose one, it is better to be feared. Netanyahu is not loved, especially by those in his party. But he is feared and acknowledged, the way any large, effective object is feared and respected.

I’m visiting Israel for the 18th or 19th time (my son is currently a member of the Lone Soldiers Program, which allows people from around the world to serve in the Israeli military). I asked a couple of smart Israelis what their coming elections are about. They said that the elections are about one thing: What do you think of Netanyahu? Such is the outsized role he plays in the consciousness of this nation.

No one has a simple view of him. To some, he is a monster who has expanded the settlements on the West Bank, which are a moral stain and do calamitous damage to Israel’s efforts to win support around the world. To some, he is the necessary man in hard times, the vigilant guardian as the rest of the Middle East goes berserk.

It’s important to note that Niccolo Machiavelli was a Christian of the Catholic faith and his ruthless support for mass murder comes from glorifying Christian conquests of Muslims, even within The Prince itself. The genocide of Gaza comes right out of Niccolo Machiavelli’s explanations that you need to cleanse the prior foundations and build your own foundations to make a powerful city-state. The foundations being a euphemism for groups of people who support a specific princely ruler. Will Durant, whom Netanyahu is likely even more well-read on than I am, provides ample evidence for why this ruthlessness is necessary with the history of the genocide of India under Islamic conquests for the first five-hundred years of Islamic invasions of India from 1000 AD – 1500 AD and then Aurangzeb’s brutal rule after a temporary peaceful period during Akbar the Great’s reign. When Netanyahu quotes or references the Old Testament Bible, he stimulates in his Zionist followers minds the need to fulfill Jewish prophecies with his academic and historical understanding of the necessity of Machiavelli’s teachings for making a powerful city-state. That way, he influences his own Jewish supporters in Israel that they’re following the command of YHWH when they genocide Gaza and I need you all to understand that this is deliberate on his part and he’s referenced the Bible in speeches publicly. If you care about the human rights of Palestine at all, you have to look at how the Bible is the most useful weapon for mass murder ever devised in human history.

Why do I constantly mention Benjamin Netanyahu’s brilliance? It’s because the way he has lived his life and what he’s achieved through how he lives his life is a categorical repudiation of Christianity, Chris Hedges’s arguments about New Atheism, and all arguments refusing to criticize religion. All arguments about the values of mythology or the Bible giving meaning to people’s lives needs to be seriously re-evaluated because of what this one man has achieved; above all, it is a veneration of Western philosophy above Christianity. That must be recognized as the uncontested truth of what this man, and likely his various administrations, has achieved. Within his personal views outside of being a Statesman, Netanyahu appears to believe in Nietzsche’s philosophy of the Übermensch and it’s in every aspect of what he does with both the positives and negatives of Nietzsche’s philosophy. He doesn’t want the public knowing this, because then you can see through his real political power. As mentioned prior, the US public is seen as rabble to him, he follows Nietzsche’s misogynistic views on women’s roles which is why he never respected his previous wives and constantly cheated on them along with refusing to acknowledge his daughter’s existence (1), and he answered the question of nihilism and a world with no objective moral values with forming his own personal dream goal of turning Israel into a world power. Netanyahu will undergo all suffering imaginable and never give-up on his personal dream goal. People who have also read Thus Spoke Zarathustra have interpreted the work to mean making yourself into an extension of prior myths and turning yourself into a new mythic figure. This wasn’t my interpretation, but two separate people on Discord who said they’d also read Thus Spoke Zarathustra informed me that this was what one of the deeper meanings of the work was to them after finishing it. Netanyahu likely infused his mythologizing of the Old Testament YHWH and the Prince David figure within the Book of Ezekiel in order to manipulate and exploit those gullible, stupid Christian Americans into supporting Israel above human laws, because Christian Zionists believe in Divine Command theory. Divine Command theory of fulfilling Biblical prophecies in support of the genocide of Palestinians keeps Israel in power above all else. Thus, the International Criminal Court’s laws cannot apply to Netanyahu, because Netanyahu is bringing about Biblical Law with his genocide of Gaza as an absolute and divine command by YHWH, per the fulfillment of Jewish prophecies in the Book of Ezekiel. In other words, Christians who support Israel view it as supporting Biblical Law above human laws of the ICC, which serves Netanyahu’s genius system of holding himself and Israel above all war crimes, so that he can continue the Greater Judea project by continuing the genocide of the surrounding Arab countries beyond just Lebanon unless they start building oil pipelines and selling oil on Israel’s currency. Finally, Netanyahu blended Nietzsche’s critique of Christianity with Plato’s Allegory of the Cave by inverting Plato’s critique with the psychopathic delusion of the Biblical prophecy of the Book of Revelation for Christians to support him. That is, by inverting the Allegory of the Cave into the illusions of Jesus Christ’s Second Coming, Christian Zionists in the US and Europe proudly and unwaveringly support the annihilation and collapse of their own Western civilizations believing it a necessary step for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Netanyahu unfailingly uses that mental model in their minds to have them continue to support Israel at the expense of themselves and their children’s livelihoods for the benefit of his personal dream of Greater Judea, because most Christians believe eternal life with Jesus Christ will come to them.

Once Netanyahu gets the US-Israel military merger, the Rothschild dynasty seem to think it’ll be their control system, but he’s seeking to get US Nuclear codes to turn them off for China’s invasion; the mystery of the missing F-35 parts, Elaine Chao being a former Secretary of Transport, revealed to have connections to CCP intelligence, and her mysterious trip to China around June 12^th, 2026 prior to the disappearance earlier this month in September 2026. Once an invasion starts, or Donald Trump uses nuclear weapons upon Iran which justifies an invasion or nuclear weapons to be used by other countries regardless, then Jews of America will be forced to leave for Israel where it is safer for their families. This will further create legitimacy for Israel’s existence and help Netanyahu’s plan of expanding Israel’s territories for the Greater Judea project by having US military installations replaced by India’s military installations with the 2400 years of Jewish-Hindu peace pact being the firm partnership between Netanyahu and Modi (1). Moreover, Netanyahu will be legally untouchable by the United Nations once the sanctions on the ICC are imposed and the ICC broken-up, so that Israel and India can pursue their self-interests without any legal recourse or justification for the United Nations to be able to act. In both cases, Biblical Law and a theological agreement based upon a 2400 year peace pact of diversity between the two oldest living religions that still exist in humanity, will replace the secular laws of the United Nations as a transvaluation of values to begin a new international legal system without Christian or Enlightenment underpinnings. Islamic nation-states will have no choice but to submit, because Islam forbids usury and thus Israel will become the sole marketplace for the sale of most or all of the oil in the Middle East with Israel’s currency becoming the dominant currency replacing the US Petrodollar system.

Netanyahu’s realpolitik of blending Machiavelli and Nietzsche is unimpeachable proof that Nietzsche’s philosophy has defeated Christianity. Netanyahu and the Rothschild dynasty’s transvaluation of values was manipulating gullible, stupid Christian Americans into hating the LGBT in order to make the largest money transfer in contemporary history and make them into penniless beggars. The obfuscation by Netanyahu is due to his deep philosophical readings of Nietzsche and following Nietzsche’s principles throughout his life, albeit mixed with Will Durant, Plato, and Machiavelli. Aphorism 25 of Chapter II of Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche serves as a good example of his philosophical outlook.

Aphorism 25 of Chapter II of Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche:

25. After such a cheerful commencement, a serious word would fain be heard; it appeals to the most serious minds. Take care, ye philosophers and friends of knowledge, and beware of martyrdom! Of suffering “for the truth’s sake”! even in your own defense! It spoils all the innocence and fine neutrality of your conscience; it makes you headstrong against objections and red rags; it stupefies, animalizes, and brutalizes, when in the struggle with danger, slander, suspicion, expulsion, and even worse consequences of enmity, ye have at last to play your last card as protectors of truth upon earth—as though “the Truth” were such an innocent and incompetent creature as to require protectors! and you of all people, ye knights of the sorrowful countenance, Messrs Loafers and Cobweb-spinners of the spirit! Finally, ye know sufficiently well that it cannot be of any consequence if YE just carry your point; ye know that hitherto no philosopher has carried his point, and that there might be a more laudable truthfulness in every little interrogative mark which you place after your special words and favourite doctrines (and occasionally after yourselves) than in all the solemn pantomime and trumping games before accusers and law-courts! Rather go out of the way! Flee into concealment! And have your masks and your ruses, that ye may be mistaken for what you are, or somewhat feared! And pray, don’t forget the garden, the garden with golden trellis-work! And have people around you who are as a garden—or as music on the waters at eventide, when already the day becomes a memory. Choose the GOOD solitude, the free, wanton, lightsome solitude, which also gives you the right still to remain good in any sense whatsoever! How poisonous, how crafty, how bad, does every long war make one, which cannot be waged openly by means of force! How PERSONAL does a long fear make one, a long watching of enemies, of possible enemies! These pariahs of society, these long-pursued, badly-persecuted ones—also the compulsory recluses, the Spinozas or Giordano Brunos—always become in the end, even under the most intellectual masquerade, and perhaps without being themselves aware of it, refined vengeance-seekers and poison-Brewers (just lay bare the foundation of Spinoza’s ethics and theology!), not to speak of the stupidity of moral indignation, which is the unfailing sign in a philosopher that the sense of philosophical humour has left him. The martyrdom of the philosopher, his “sacrifice for the sake of truth,” forces into the light whatever of the agitator and actor lurks in him; and if one has hitherto contemplated him only with artistic curiosity, with regard to many a philosopher it is easy to understand the dangerous desire to see him also in his deterioration (deteriorated into a “martyr,” into a stage-and-tribune-bawler). Only, that it is necessary with such a desire to be clear WHAT spectacle one will see in any case—merely a satyric play, merely an epilogue farce, merely the continued proof that the long, real tragedy IS AT AN END, supposing that every philosophy has been a long tragedy in its origin.

I strongly suspect that Netanyahu wants people to think in terms of anti-Semitism so that he can conceal his real brilliant mind and pursue his political interests for his personal dream, the Greater Judea project. As controversial as it may sound, he may have read anti-Semitic content and acted in those stereotypes precisely to increase hatred for Jews, so that he can fulfill his dream of the Greater Judea project and please keep in mind that this man is well-read on history with a renowned father who was a professor of history and literature. I refer to Benjamin Netanyahu’s goal as the Greater Judea project, because there’s a difference in viewpoint within Israel itself; according to Israeli historian Ilan Pappe. Greater Israel seems to represent slightly more pluralism, whereas Greater Judea generally refers to a Jewish racial focus from my takeaway of how he explained it. Netanyahu’s specific dream goal seems to be turning Israel into a world power and planting the seeds to make it into an empire. In other words, any spread of anti-Semitism helps the Greater Judea project, because Netanyahu can then encourage more regular Jewish people that it’s in their best interests to come to Israel, which furthers Netanyahu’s dream of Greater Judea – the whole purpose of which is to build a solitary civilization for Jewish people and – equally as important – to give future Jewish generations a nation-state that serves as a world power. The self-fulfilling and circular nature of Christian hatred of Jews to force them to flee to Israel is what he wants, so he can turn Israel into a long-lasting empire. Per Nietzschean philosophy, Netanyahu is ruthlessly devoted to his dream as his meaning and purpose in life. In my humble opinion, Netanyahu is literally the most brilliant contemporary political leader following his dream, regardless of what thwarts him. We all must understand… he will never relent from his dream. He likely views Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and his closest personal friend, Narendra Modi, as his equals because they have the same ambition and drive for their respective countries while the US is mired in blackmail, so-called “leverage” that is really just weakness, and scandals because US Boomers have been unmitigated human failures in all respects and will only ever be remembered as the Pedophile Generation after the Epstein files by their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. Todd Blanche’s efforts to keep Epstein out of the historical record as a chapter of US history won’t matter once all the US Boomers pass on and there will be nobody left alive who will carry on supporting Trumpism. It literally doesn’t matter what any of them do to try to claim conspiracy or clear their name, they won’t live forever because the Bible’s claims of immortality that Judeo-Christian Kabbalist billionaires and the Christian Zionist Boomers believe are overwhelmingly false. Most Boomers in the US and most of the billionaires appear to assume they will become immortal due to Bible prophecies, but the Bible is a book of fiction and Netanyahu manipulated them just as he manipulated everyone else to achieve his dream.

And, what I believe, Netanyahu fundamentally thinks regarding the Greater Judea project:

And this secret spake Life herself unto me. “Behold,” said she, “I am that which must ever surpass itself.

To be sure, ye call it will to procreation, or impulse towards a goal, towards the higher, remoter, more manifold: but all that is one and the same secret.

Rather would I succumb than disown this one thing; and verily, where there is succumbing and leaf-falling, lo, there doth Life sacrifice itself—for power!

That I have to be struggle, and becoming, and purpose, and cross-purpose—ah, he who divineth my will, divineth well also on what crooked paths it hath to tread!

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. XXXIV. SELF-SURPASSING (Pgs. 108-111). Thus spake Zarathustra: a book for all and none. Translated by Thomas Common, PDF ed., T. Common, 1908.

In summa, Netanyahu’s actual philosophical underpinnings is a total repudiation of all special pleading arguments in favor of keeping religion a taboo of public discourse. Ultimately, this is why Netanyahu has been so successful and why I fear that he may yet achieve his military merger either through a bill passing into law or deceiving ignoramuses like Pete Hegseth or through his spy, Marco Rubio. When Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson begin phrasing the War in Iran or Israel’s actions writ large in terms of demons, Baal worship, or Jews being demonic; this was genuinely serving Benjamin Netanyahu’s long-term interests. I wouldn’t be surprised if he privately laughed at how well his manipulations were going, if he ever took the time to look at such videos in his own private time. This is because it was really Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson playing into Benjamin Netanyahu’s trap of mythologizing his political aims. The use of the Bible to explain Netanyahu’s actions through the New Testament’s vilification of Jews serves Benjamin Netanyahu’s interests of encouraging Jewish Americans to leave for Israel and it will also increase anti-Semitism from the less knowledgeable of their fanbase. The Young Turks were grappling with the dumbfounding findings in the Epstein files and trying to understand what it all meant, so I thought providing my insight to them on what I read-up of Netanyahu’s history and my understanding of the same philosophers on Twitter might be of some value. Everything I wrote wasn’t to hurt the feelings of people like Ana Kasparian, Cenk Uygur, or Chris Hedges and a part of me felt really bad for having to rebuke them, but I feel strongly in the sense of protecting the human rights of both Palestinian and Jewish Americans that I had to write what I know to be the truth to the best of my ability. I’m mostly confused by why nobody else was able to see Netanyahu’s brilliance for what it is, especially now that his policy aims are all that any of us ever talk about. The best I can surmise: Cenk and Ana have a tight schedule, so they can’t go too in-depth on Netanyahu’s background and can only rely on the increasingly harsher feedback in their comments section. Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson wrongly believe the Bible is a good source of moral values and guide to life and so they couldn’t see it, because the Bible dwarfed their critical thinking when it came to Israel. Chris Hedges seemed to conflate Netanyahu’s friendship with Donald Trump for him being similar to Trump, when he’s arguably the complete opposite in personality. The only close personal friend that Benjamin Netanyahu claims to have is Narendra Modi, not Donald Trump to the best of my knowledge. The relationship between Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump seems to be more similar to a Master and Servant or Mob Boss and Mafioso servant. Hedges, and the majority of America at this point, unfortunately have grown up believing incompetent leadership is the norm to the extent that we don’t recognize competent leadership like Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Narendra Modi. They have flaws and they can make major mistakes, but they bounce back and work on improving their civilizations to the best of their ability. American leadership never did that because it prioritized the short-term interests of the One Percent over the stability of US empire.

I feel like everything I ever believed about America was just a lie, especially if nobody talks about the Rothschild dynasty’s financing of Jeffrey Epstein or how the US billionaire families (who are mostly Christian) are really billionaire Crime families who can operate above the law as part of a Government-Mafia nexus. In the end, truth and honesty didn’t matter, rape of children is protected by Christian culture in both Churches and in the Federal government regardless of if the perpetrators are Jews or Christians, and none of these Republicans give a damn about billionaires kidnapping and raping kids or National Security; while US Boomers keep voting based upon unwavering faith the Bible to support US taxpayer funds to be sent to Israel to assist Israel’s genocide of Arabs. All this on top of what I’ve written in length about the continued human rights abuses upon Native Americans which never led to any legal changes to overturn the US Supreme Court decision of Oliphant vs Suquamish 1978. My country has taught me that I wrong to believe in human rights. Stroking Abrahamic believers’ egos to make them support their preconceived notions gets you everything you want, while telling people the truth gets you called an idiot or a conspiracy theorist or an asshole. Every contemptuous remark thrown at Ana Kasparian, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Cenk Uygur, and many others for simply trying their best to support human rights of their fellow Americans and the human rights of people more globally is proof that Nietzsche has conquered Christianity. As long as the hivemind of Christianity exists to exploit people into destroying their own prosperity for the delusions of eternal life, there will always be future generations who look to Benjamin Netanyahu as a blueprint for conquering the minds and manipulating such useful idiots for their own political interests. Benjamin Netanyahu is living proof that Nietzsche was right about using myth and falsehood to pursue your personal interests above telling people the truth.

XXVIII. THE RABBLE

LIFE IS A WELL of delight; but where the rabble also drink there all fountains are poisoned.

To everything cleanly am I well disposed; but I hate to see the grinning mouths and the thirst of the unclean. They cast their eye down into the fountain: and now glanceth up to me their odious smile out of the fountain

The holy water have they poisoned with their lustfulness; and when they called their filthy dreams delight then poisoned they also the words.

Indignant becometh the flame when they put their damp hearts to the fire; the spirit itself bubbleth and smoketh when the rabble approach the fire.

Mawkish and over-mellow becometh the fruit in their hands: unsteady, and withered at the top, doth their look make the fruit-tree.

And many a one who hath turned away from life, hath only turned away from the rabble: he hated to share with them fountain, flame, and fruit.

And many a one who hath gone into the wilderness and suffered thirst with beasts of prey, disliked only to sit at the cistern with filthy camel-drivers.

And many a one who hath come along as a destroyer and as a hailstorm to all cornfields, wanted merely to put his foot into the jaws of the rabble, and thus stop their throat

And it is not the mouthful which hath most choked me, to know that life itself requireth enmity and death and torture-crosses:—

But I asked once, and suffocated almost with my question: What? is the rabble also necessary for life?

Are poisoned fountains necessary, and stinking fires and filthy dreams, and maggots in the bread of life?

Not my hatred, but my loathing, gnawed hungrily at my life! Ah, ofttimes became I weary of spirit, when found even the rabble spiritual.

And on the rulers turned I my back, when I saw what they now call ruling: to traffic and bargain for power—with the rabble.

Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. XXVIII: THE RABBLE (Pg. 94). Thus spake Zarathustra: a book for all and none. Translated by Thomas Common, PDF ed., T. Common, 1908.