I used this quote before, but I believe it applies to this topic too.

If any of you needed more confirmation that my presentation of these people is correct despite the fact that I did not, in fact, break any of their subreddit rules and their note doesn’t even say I did. These people are genuinely deranged and dangerous due to having too much money and ignorance combined together:

4/5/2025 Update: I decided to check the Wikipedia listings of terrorism in India from the 1980s – 2024 more thoroughly. I’ve since made a correction to not seem hyperbolic. The incidents of Islamic terrorism are nearly 60 % of cases in India, not 80 – 90 % as I had assumed from a more cursory view. My mistake and that’s why I’ve corrected it.

Oh, and if you needed further proof of how self-centered, self-righteous, and utterly bigoted self-stylized Neoliberals are:

They refuse to debate or have any sort of discussion at all when questioned, and assume anyone who disagrees with them is beneath them, even when they bring in ideologies of grooming gangs that rape children. They just compartmentalize it because their only focus is on future gains in profit. This is who the Neoliberal groups really are as people.

---

Table of Contents for A Hindu Critiques Islam:

1. Chapters 1-3: Doctrinal Failings, Samkhya and Advaita Vedanta Critique, What “Islamophobia” Shields
2. Chapter 4: Social Status and Genocide Denial
3. Chapter 5:  Neoliberalism Empowers Islamism
4. Chapter 6: Did the British Partition of 1947 Gradually Decline the UK and Bolster India?
5. Chapter 7: Islamic Terrorism’s 1st-Generation was Al Qaeda, 2nd-Generation was ISIS, and a 3rd-Generation’s making a Digital Caliphate from “Islamophobia” Censorship
6. Chapter 8: The Partition of Free Speech
7. Chapters 9 and 10: Follies of Islam Repurposed and Islamism Always Creates Failed States

Extras: Islam’s 200-years of Mass Genocide of Iran, Islam’s 500-years of Mass Genocide of India, and judging from Wikipedia, Islamic Terrorism makes-up 58% of all Terror incidents in India between 1980 – 2024 and that’s lowballing it.

---

4

Basically, my title immoralist involves two denials. I first deny the type of man that has hitherto been regarded as the highest type— the good, the kind, and the charitable, and secondly, I deny that kind of morality which has come to be recognized and to dominate as morality itself— decadence morality or to use a still cruder term, Christian morality. I would regard the second denial as the more decisive as the overestimation of the value of goodness and kindness seems to me already a consequence of decadence, as a symptom of weakness and incompatible with an ascending and affirmative life: denial and destruction are inseparable from an affirmative attitude towards life.— Let me stay for a moment with the question of the psychology of the good man. In order to determine the value of a certain type of man, the cost of maintaining him must be calculated— and for this the conditions of his existence must be known. The condition of existence of the good is the lie— or to put it differently, the refusal at any price to see how reality is actually constituted, the refusal to see that this reality does not always give rise to benevolence, even less that it provides a constant justification for interference by short-sighted and good-natured hands. To regard emergencies in general as an objection, as something which must be abolished, is the greatest nonsense on earth, having the most disastrous consequences, fatally stupid— almost as stupid as a wish to abolish bad weather— out of pity for the poor… In the general economy of things the fearful aspects of reality (in terms of passions, desires, of the will to power) are incalculably more necessary than any form of petty happiness, so-called “goodness”, in fact, one must even consider whether it is worth giving it a place at all, seeing that it is based upon a falsification of the instincts. I shall have an excellent opportunity of showing the incalculably calamitous consequences for the whole of history of optimism, this monstrous offspring of the homines optimi. Zarathustra, the first to recognize that the optimist is just as degenerate as the pessimist and possibly more detrimental says: good men never speak the truth. The Good preach of false shores and false security, you were born and bred in the lies of the good. Through the good everything has become false and twisted down to the very roots. Fortunately the world is not built solely to serve good-natured herd animals their little happiness, or to demand that everybody becomes a “good man”, herd animal, blue-eyed, benevolent, “beautiful soul”— or, as Herbert Spencer has it, altruistic— would mean robbing existence of its great character, to castrate mankind and reduce humanity to a sort of wretched Chinadom.— And this some have tried to do!.. It is precisely this that men have called morality… It is in this sense that Zarathustra calls the good at times “the last men” and at times ‘the beginning of the end”, above all he considers them as the most harmful kind of men, because they secure their existence at the expense of truth and at the expense of the future.

The good— they cannot create: they are always the beginning of the end—
—they crucify him who writes new values on new law tables, they sacrifice the future to themselves, they crucify the whole future of humanity!
The good— they are always the beginning of the end… And whatever harm the slanderers of the world may do, the harm done by the good is the most harmful of all.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Ecce Homo (translated, unexpurgated) (Lexido Classic Texts) . Lexido.com. Kindle Edition. For reference: Aphorism 4 of Chapter “Why I am a Destiny“

Please be aware, this is not an advocacy of any economic position, but rather my general examination of how Islamism is strengthened by Neoliberalism and mostly an opinion instead of an analysis. Neoliberalism is a free-market capitalist economic policy; certain subsets of Right-wing blogospheres wrongly try to portray it as some type of Marxist takeover and conflate it with terms like globalism. It is not Marxist and the contemporary usage of Marxist social value systems for political ideologies like Wokeism was arguably a concession by Neoliberals after they failed to convince people of Libertarian and Free market economic principles by promoting Ayn Rand around the early 2000s – 2010s. Nevertheless, it is important to keep in mind that capitalism conceding to superficial promotions of Marxist social values was never going to mean support for Marxist economic reforms of any kind. Such arguments simply lack strong evidence to support them. Most importantly, free market capitalism should not be confused for the only form of capitalism as that’s a pernicious and extremist view of economic policy. If you have strong disagreements with anything I’ve said, then I’m begging you to please read through everything carefully before making a judgment on my worldview. I’m a capitalist, I have never supported economic theories of either Marxism or Socialism, and I find it silly that we’ve turned discussions of economic theories into a form of social identity politics.

The conflicting views regarding Neoliberalism are due to the distinctions of what it purports to be, what it actually is, and perceptions by regular people due to the resulting disconnect that they suffer the consequences of; primarily as a result of the ignorance of Neoliberal economists. Pro-Neoliberal economists, politicians, lobbyists, businesspeople, and some scholars purport in the broadest sense that Neoliberalism is about advancing universal human rights, free market economics, Individualism, and that the uncontested superiority of these value systems would form a sort of global monoculture of Western Universalism. In the narrowest sense, it meant that free market economics and the free movement of people outside of their origin countries to migrate into Western countries to increase future economic gains in productivity to offset declining birth rates. Generally speaking, while Neoliberalism is a mostly economic theory and Western Universalism is about the propagation of Western values into the world, Neoliberalism and Western Universalism were conflated with the expectation by Neoliberal economists from the 1990s, to the 2010s, and even still today that Western values would automatically flourish from the spread of free market economics. Most politicians, economists, popular scholars of their respective decade, businesspeople, and lobbyists assumed there would be stopgaps and slowdowns due to political turmoil, but that it would inevitably move towards a Western Universalist monoculture as a sort of flourishing world peace due to economic prosperity.  However, outside of the economic and pollution debates which would be beyond the focus of this book, this ideology of Neoliberalism came with three chief problems that it failed to answer and which proponents have never been able to sufficiently grapple with. First, which components of human rights do we value more: Religious Tolerance or Free Speech? Second, is this aggressive push by free market capitalists for the Free Migration of people desirable, sustainable, and truly going to yield long-term economic gains in the future as they envisioned? Third, what are the unintended social consequences of pursuing a global monoculture?

The Free-market capitalists and their loyal jesters in the corporate media circus responded to the first question by trying to enforce a Canadian style principle of “Reasonable Limits” to Free Speech criticisms of religion. The corporate mass media of the US was essentially weaponized to prohibit certain forms of Free Speech as socially taboo and it negatively impacted the perceptions of other organizations that were trying to do sincere human rights activism. This was not the corporate media’s only implicit “Reasonable Limit” as there was also stalwart efforts to shut down all criticisms of free market economics, a shut down of any meaningful criticism of US Foreign Policy blunders, and a complete silence over the corporate mass media lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction as an argument to convince the US public to support President Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003; for the purposes of this book, we will strictly focus upon the effects this had on religious criticism. Needless to say, anything that deviated from the implicit “reasonable limits” was therefore too extreme and not acceptable speech. Terms such as Islamophobia and an attempt to racialize a religious group of nearly two billion adherents were developed as tactics to shut down the inalienable right of Free Speech of all Americans and the Enlightenment cultural values of Western Europe.

Islamophobia was peddled aggressively by the jester-journalists of the corporate media circus. The first witch-hunt against those who deviated from the jester orthodoxy were the New Atheists for pointing to the unique theological problems of Islam. Criticizing Christianity was perfectly acceptable and having such debates between Christianity and Atheism in US universities was fine, but White Atheists criticizing Islam? “Scientism”, “Islamophobia”, “Bigotry”, and “Racist” were often accusations hurled upon them for the blasphemy of criticizing Islam. This incoherence of the corporate jesters’ arguments went so far that Ex-Muslim Christian Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslim Reformist Maajid Nawaz were both argued or insinuated to be ignorant bigots of the religion that largely wants to kill them. Despite the reality that Islamists really do desire to kill one for leaving Islam and the other for espousing “bid’ah” upon Islam, even anti-discrimination organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) were deceived into using the term Islamophobia to shut down criticisms of Islam; this is even after Maajid Nawaz sued them for adding his organization, Quilliam, to a list of organized groups who purportedly “hate” Muslims.[1] The SPLC added him despite the fact that Maajid Nawaz is himself a Muslim and seeks to promote peaceful reformation.[2] The incoherence of this corporate media circus was most notably demonstrated by their silence over President Obama overseeing drone bombings of seven different countries against Islamic terrorists, but which caused untold suffering upon an unaccounted number of Muslim civilians. While President Obama pursued this policy of drone bombings, the corporate media circus praised President Obama’s U.N. speech in which President Obama argued that the Prophet of Islam should not be criticized. In other words, in the monoculture of Western Universalism, respecting the collective illusion of sense-objects from religious beliefs was more important than the lives of Muslim civilians who had nothing to do with terrorism.

Second, the sole focus on future economic gains from the mass migration of large Muslim populations into Europe was supported under two chief presumptions: that it was taboo to criticize religion and that Muslim migrants and refugees would eventually “Westernize” on the basis that it is inevitable. Mass shootings, bombings, violence against women, British cities consisting of Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs that willfully seek to rape hundreds of women and little girls[3], Muslim migrants attempts at forming thuggish groups of Sharia morality police in Germany to Islamize the society[4], Muslim migrants in France saying French women cannot be allowed at restaurants or cafes because women aren’t allowed live like that in their country of origin[5], and the formation of Muslim enclaves where they remain as deliberately segregated communities are all viewed as temporary problems until the purported inevitable adaption to Western values; all so that the economies keep increasing in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) so that the business elites continue to make increasing profits under the sense-object of future economic prospects. The lobbyists, businesspeople, economists, and politicians who kept peddling neoliberalism clearly viewed all of this as a temporary inconvenience because of their abject ignorance of Islamic culture and the full range of danger from Islamist political ideologies. They wrongly kept compartmentalizing these as isolated incidents instead of viewing it as what it actually is: a relentless political ideology that seeks to fundamentally transform all non-Muslim civilizations into 7^th century technological, social, and political standards. Even worse, the neoliberal political elite effectively helped sell Islamist Judgment Day religious fervor due the Great Recession and ignoring the declining living standards. In opening up borders to Islamic communities in an effort to raise the European Union’s collective GDP, the neoliberal elite have allowed a religious ideology that is fundamentally opposed to Adam Smith’s social innovations from the 18^th century that form the basis for modern capitalism; simply because it was created after the 7^th century of the Prophet Mohammad’s time. Arguments pointing to the Islamic monarchies of the Arab Spring purportedly adapting capitalism ignore the fact that modern slavery exists in many of those countries under the Kafala system and the influence of Free Speech condemnations from the US and the West itself.[6] In other words, the neoliberal elite ignoring the exploitation of workers forced into slavery in the Arab Spring was also in ignorance of the fact that the Islamic monarchies haven’t adopted capitalism, but simply remade the slave system in Islam with a capitalist façade because the neoliberal elite were likely gaining from the slave system too.

Over the many years, the condemnations towards Neoliberalism and Western Universalism under the umbrella term of “Globalism” kept piling up. The peddling of Ayn Rand or lassie faire capitalism no longer became tenable to shut down criticisms in order to ignore reality and facts. The neoliberal elite simply barked at their loyal jesters in the corporate media, whose press passes and journalistic badges are basically glorified dog collars, to write about Islamophobia, to scream racism or whatever other ism to shut down criticisms, and to continue the implicit pursuit of “reasonable limits” while categorizing the pain inflicted upon the broader public as some form of racism for having Free Speech criticisms. Even as mounting evidence of hundreds of little girls being raped in Britain; Islamic terrorist bombings like the Boston bombing and terrorist shootings like the Bernardino shooting and Pulse nightclub shooting in the US; the insane amount of Islamic terrorist bombings that India endures every year such as the October 2005 Delhi bombings to the March 2024 Bengaluru café bombings; and the unwillingness of Islamic communities to adapt to Western culture in multiple European countries to instead form their own isolated enclaves continued unimpeded. The ignorance of the neoliberal elite could be seen in how stunned they were at the emergence and long-term success of nationalist politics after they had successfully barked at their jester-journalists to ignore all the pain and suffering their economic policies inflicted upon the broader public throughout multiple countries by designating all of it as racist.

Third, the pursuit of a global monoculture of Neoliberalism and Western Universalism has incontrovertibly led to a nonculture that fractured into incoherence. The neoliberal elite’s persistence to shut down all criticisms of any component of neoliberalism as unrealistic or illusory with politicians like Prime Minister Tony Blair claiming it was effectively inarguable and President Bill Clinton adding neoliberal policies to the Democrat political agenda and betraying the unions[7]; the ideological arguments that were espoused effectively became the earliest emerging versions of what would later happen in US universities with Wokeism. That is, they replaced culture with what journalist Chris Hedges argues is the “the cult of the self” and we see it every day with what Wokeism became. The earliest emergence of this was the neoliberals themselves with their arguments that nobody could argue against Neoliberal economic policies as if they were somehow tied to the identity of these people and it was presented more as their divine truth than anything they believed on the basis of rationality, facts, and evidence. They presented as divine orthodoxy concomitant with their love for Ayn Rand’s pro-selfishness arguments. It was this figurative bubble shielding neoliberalism from any criticism that eventually created off-shoots and countercultures like Wokeism. Instead of a culture that values actual philosophy like Enlightenment values, the US Founding Fathers views on Free Speech, robust religious debates on questions of the human condition and truth that the New Atheists had, or even philosophical critiques in artform; we had all of that replaced with race and gender effectively being bizarre and stunted replacements for culture. It was not robust and informative critiques about racial equality such as Martin Luther King Jr or Malcolm X’s historic speeches. It was not a historical recognition of the contributions of Native American cultures of North America to modern women’s rights.[8] It certainly wasn’t a recognition of Dharmic cultures’ contributions and support for Transgenderism until British imperialism ruthlessly criminalized it for approximately 250 years. It was primarily the shifting of the implicit “reasonable limits on Free Speech” principle to not being allowed to debate anything about Transgenderism, not being allowed to debate anything without accusations that you were somehow a phobic or a racist, or the most bizarre accusations that anyone disagreeing with Wokeism was a bad faith actor secretly seeking to harm racial minorities, women’s rights, and the LGBT. Every identity-ism became an accusatory method of labeling other people as bigots, conspiracy theorists, and loons.

In the same way neoliberal elites demanded nobody had the right to critique or criticize Neoliberalism, overgrowths of this emerged with the coinage of the term Islamophobia as somehow equivalent to homophobia despite Islam being a religious belief system with nearly two billion adherents and existing for roughly fourteen-hundred years, and then this concept branched out into off-shoots like gender and race becoming uncontestable identities due to an overemphasis on people’s feelings instead of an argument based upon evidence and rational critique. As a result, Islamism continues to go unchecked and empowers itself from this confused and incoherent ideology that places no value on Free Speech. Please consider the following: if a 7^th century Arab fundamentalist ideology can utilize and effectively strangle discussions in democratic societies by using Wokeism as a useful tool to continue a long-term plan of regressing all non-Muslim societies into 7^th century standards, then what does this really say about the value of Wokeism? If it has been doing the same with exploiting Western Universalism to shut down criticisms of Islam, then what does that say about the value of Western Universalism? The reason this is working is because both the Woke Left and the Neoliberal elite don’t have a culture and don’t value culture. Western Universalism has given way to incoherence and abject nothingness that even Islamism can fill the void of within democratic societies, because there is no focus or respect for genuine philosophy. Fundamental building blocks of ideas have been tossed for feelings of offense which encourage only a “I know it when I see it” mentality that is no different from Islamists being offended by images of the Prophet Mohammad. There’s no sense of value in Free Speech. There’s no respect for ideas. There’re only aggressive, mob-like outcries and cancel culture due to a lack of ability and willingness to argue in favor of the beliefs that they hold. Why do you believe that your values are inherently good and others should support it, if you can’t argue in favor of them through your own reasoning and communication?

A possible solution to counter this would be to separate the Founders from their philosophical arguments similar to what’s already done in Hinduism and subsets of Western philosophy itself. It is similar to the idea of separating art from the artist. In this instance, it is focusing on advancing the method and not on the historical figures that first proposed them. From a historical perspective, it’s perfectly fine to appreciate the individual, but not from a philosophical perspective of advancing lines of inquiry and reasoning. The US Founding Fathers were racist slave-owners, but that’s not all that they were; Thomas Jefferson gave an amazing critique in favor of Free Speech that is awe-inspiring to me and he was also a deplorable racist against Native Americans. His philosophical views of Free Speech can be separated from his hateful views towards Native Americans; one is a philosophical view that has benefitted US society with so much technological innovation through the efforts of multiple ethnic backgrounds throughout the nearly 250 years of US history and the other is inexcusable racism towards Native Americans. If we haven’t already come to a point in US society where we can agree to separate the two, then what are we doing? For whatever reason, Wokeism completely fails to accept this distinction between Thomas Jefferson’s philosophical arguments and his racism. It simply peddles the argument that people are racist and cannot be allowed to argue against such accusations made against them. Islamism is winning because of this simplistic mindset. In fairness to Wokeism, and so as not to completely present a one-sided view, there has been an encouragement towards the reconceptualization of the US as a melting pot of cultures with highlighting innovations, artistic achievements, and historic milestones of multiple ethnic minorities in US history and throughout the world. Examples would be Google searches showing the innovations of minority inventors and female inventors like Americans Alice H. Parker, Fredrick McKinley Jones, or foreign innovators like Jagadish Chandra Bose of India and Ada Lovelace of Britain. Nevertheless, for the purposes of advancing society, it’s probably better to focus on the advancements of methods regardless of who was the originator.

The Western world’s willful ignorance of the threat of Islamism has become absurd. It has proven beyond doubt that European-derived legal systems, Western government institutions, and nonsensical beliefs in Western Universalism have left the Western world incapable of grappling with the challenges of Islamist takeover, because of the lack of willingness to criticize harmful ideas. Neoliberal economic theories and the obnoxious encouragement of Western Universalism have stultified and weakened the Western world due to a refusal to value Free Speech. While the United States has a mixed message of being both Western and a melting pot that ostensibly encourages cultural diversity; it has only recently pursued attempts at the conceptualization of being a melting pot of diverse cultures working together with a unified faith in US nationalism instead of parroting Western Universalism. Thankfully, it had a backlash to Wokeism’s propensity to try to shut down debate. Western Europe has not been so lucky. Nowhere is the absurdity and failures of Western Universalism clearer than the country of Sweden. Sweden is the pinnacle of what happens when compassionate, bleeding-heart Europeans delude themselves into Western Universalist value judgments and refuse to criticize the hateful ideas within Islam, even as they suffer being bombed every waking day of their lives. Even as their children are put in danger of being bombed by foreign “refugees” and migrants from Syria and Iraq every single day, they refuse to criticize Islamism or even talk about the problems within Islam. It is genuinely absurd that they refuse to even call it Islamic terrorism and instead present it as gang violence, but not Muslim gang violence because that would apparently offend the sensibilities of the refugees and migrants who are bombing their cars, homes, shops, schools, and parks every single day to show how much unambiguous appreciation they have for being welcomed to live in Sweden.

In an excerpt from an article titled, “Sweden’s 100 explosions this year: What’s going on?” from Maddy Savage in a BBC article published on November 11^th, 2019:

When three explosions took place in one night across different parts of Stockholm last month, it came as a shock to residents. There had been blasts in other city suburbs, but never on their doorstep.

 

Swedish police are dealing with unprecedented levels of attacks, targeting city centre locations too. The bomb squad was called to deal with 97 explosions in the first nine months of this year.

 

“I grew up here and you feel like that environment gets violated,” says Joel, 22.

 

The front door of his apartment block in the central Stockholm neighbourhood of Sodermalm was blown out and windows were shattered along the street.

 

Who is to blame?

This category of crime was not even logged prior to 2017. Then, in 2018, there were 162 explosions and in the past two months alone the bomb squad have been called to almost 30.

 

“Bangers, improvised explosives and hand grenades” are behind most of the blasts, says Linda H Straaf, head of intelligence at Sweden’s National Operations Department.

 

The attacks are usually carried out by criminal gangs to scare rival groups or their close friends or family, she says.

“This is a serious situation, but most people shouldn’t be worried, because they are not going to be affected.”

Teams have been sent to work with gang crime specialists in the US, Germany and the Netherlands, and they are liaising with Swedish military experts who dealt with explosives in Africa and Afghanistan.

 

“It’s very new in Sweden, and we are looking for knowledge around the world,” says Mats Lovning, head of the National Operations Department.

 

For criminologist Amir Rostami, who has researched the use of hand grenades in Sweden, the only relevant comparison is Mexico, plagued by gang violence.

 

“This is unique in countries that pretty much don’t have a war or don’t have a long history of terrorism,” he says.

 

Where are the explosions?

Most attacks have taken place in low-income, vulnerable suburbs in the biggest cities: Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmo.

 

Malmo had three blasts in just over 24 hours at the start of this month.

 

But more affluent places are now being targeted too. An explosion in the residential northern Stockholm suburb of Bromma last month destroyed the entrance to a block of flats, blew out windows and damaged cars.

 

A 20-year-old passerby was treated in hospital when a bomb targeted a grocery shop in the historic university city of Lund. And 25 people were hurt when a block of flats was targeted in the central town of Linkoping.

 

Sodermalm is a former working-class area that has become increasingly gentrified. Vintage boutiques and vegan delicatessens break up grids of mustard- and terracotta-painted apartment blocks. The building targeted is opposite a park and close to a school.

 

“Immediately afterwards, when police closed off the streets and I walked with my two kids to preschool, I got really scared,” says Malin Bradshaw, who lives a few doors down.

 

No arrests have been made and police will not comment on potential motives.

 

“If it was targeted then to be honest it makes us feel safer, because then the attack was not aimed to harm the public,” says Ms Bradshaw, hoping it was not a random attack.

 

Who are Sweden’s criminal gangs?

Police say the criminals involved are part of the same gangs behind an increase in gun crime, often connected to the drugs trade. Sweden saw 45 deadly shootings in 2018, compared with 17 in 2011.

 

But why they have added explosives to their arsenal is unclear.

 

Swedish police do not record or release the ethnicity of suspects or convicted criminals, but intelligence chief Linda H Straaf says many do share a similar profile.[1]

[1] Savage, Maddy. “Sweden’s 100 Explosions This Year: What’s Going On?” BBC News, BBC, 12 Nov. 2019, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50339977.

Later on in the article, Linda H. Straaf claims the ones committing the crimes are second-or-third generation immigrants while the article later admits the Left-leaning news media completely refuses to even discuss bomb attacks to avoid “proof of problems with leftist policies” according to Christian Christenson, a Stockholm University professor of journalism.[1] How exactly are people able to verify or believe that it’s not the refugees and migrants, when the Left-leaning Swedish news media refuse to discuss it because they’re afraid of offending feelings?[2] Apparently, the mother mentioned earlier in the article, Malin Bradshaw, needs to seriously risk her preschool children being blown apart by bombs from Muslim migrants and Muslim “refugees” so that Sweden’s Leftist political parties don’t seem racist.[3]

Sadly, in the years since the BBC article was published, the problem has worsened with what are likely Muslim migrants and refugees increasing their bombings of Sweden in what are clearly terrorist activities meant to destabilize the country. An article from the Eurasia Review: News and Analysis published on January 31^st, 2025 titled “‘No Control’: Sweden Grapples With Bomb Violence Wave” with the Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson openly admitting that the Swedish government has completely lost control over the wave of bombings happening in their country. The article reads as follows:

(EurActiv) — Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson admitted that his government has lost control over a burgeoning wave of violence sweeping the country, amid escalating public concern.

 

The acknowledgment came during an emergency meeting where Kristersson announced the acceleration of new legislation targeting juvenile involvement in criminal activities.

 

The beginning of 2025 has seen bombings carried out at an average of one  per day, leading to 27 bombings by January 27 – including several in residential communities, the Nordic Times reported.

 

“Sweden is in the midst of a new wave of violence; it’s primarily the bombings that are increasing, with almost one occurring every day,” Kristersson told reporters on Thursday.

 

“It’s abundantly clear that we do not have control over this wave of violence; otherwise, we wouldn’t be here,” he added.

 

In 2024, there were 317 total blasts reported by police, which has coincided with a troubling escalation in gang-related conflicts.

 

According to the Swedish prime minister, gang violence is now affecting entire communities, showing “total indifference” to the consequences in residential areas. The Swedish Police Authority estimated in 2024 that 1,700 under-18s were active members of criminal networks.

 

In response, the Swedish government will bring forward planned legislation that will grant police more powers to detain children under the age of 15 in some circumstances. Originally due in the summer of 2026, the law is now slated to come into effect as early as 1 October this year.

 

Nevertheless, Kristersson described these criminal issues as “inherited” over a long period, suggesting that resolving them would be a project that extends through the entire decade.

 

Political pressure continues to mount on the prime minster, who has made the fight against armed crime one of his talking points in the 2022 election campaign.

 

Given that a hard line on organised crime in Sweden is one of the hallmarks of the Sweden Democrats – the far-right party that supports Kristersson’s government – the prime minister faces a dual imperative to take decisive action: to please his ally, and prevent the party out-flanking him on the issue at the 2026 election.

 

Further recent measures taken to tackle Swedish gang violence a proposal to amend the country’s constitution to strip dual nationals of their citizenship if convincted of involvement in gang crime.

 

A government-commissioned investigation also proposed on Wednesday that people convicted of crimes in Sweden should in future be able to serve their sentences in foreign prisons, as there are no ‘absolute obstacles’ under Swedish law.[1]

[1] Szumski, Charles. “‘No Control’: Sweden Grapples with Bomb Violence Wave.” Eurasia Review, EurActiv, 31 Jan. 2025, http://www.eurasiareview.com/31012025-no-control-sweden-grapples-with-bomb-violence-wave/.

Sweden is suffering an organized and deliberate sacking from within by Islamic terrorists using modern bombs and a 7^th century Arab fundamentalist mentality. Yet, the Swedish government and Swedish public refuse to utilize the use of force necessary to stop them. Why? Why are they refusing to even call the perpetrators terrorists and instead label the deliberate bombings of their own country as gang violence with a refusal to label them appropriately as Muslim terrorists, Muslim immigrants, and the purported Muslim refugees?

It is because they fear being labeled “Far-right” or the implication of being associated with any sort of fascist ideology. This insane level of tolerance for what is a sacking likely stems from the horrendous and cruel history that they imposed upon the Indigenous Sami people of Sweden, who suffered under Swedish government programs influenced by Nazism.[1] I will not go into the details of what was done to the Sami people, including to their children by a state-sponsored and Nazi-inspired policy as that’s beyond the focus of this topic. The contemporary Swedish people’s acknowledgement of guilt and genuine desire to make amends over what was done to the Sami people is admirable. The Swedish people wanting to vigorously avoid the label of Far-right due to the history of what was done to the Sami people is understandable. Having a tolerance for foreign Muslim terrorists using their own Muslim children to throw hand grenades with the purpose of bombing civilian centers is surely not the way to show commitment to this desire to make amends to the indigenous group of people that Swedes have historically abused and harmed. Allowing Muslim terrorists to organize improvised explosives that could kill Swedish, Sami, or foreign children is not acceptable and not keeping anyone safe. It is not far-right to use more assertive means to stop organized terrorists, especially not people who show a clear and intentional targeting of civilians for the explicit purpose of mass murder. This is not fair to Swedish people, it is not fair to any foreign immigrants who simply want to live peacefully in Sweden, and it is surely putting the Sami people in danger too.

The Swedish governments positions on this matter are not an acceptable, or moral, or intelligent policy. I can’t help but paraphrase a meme when reading about what has been happening in Sweden: This is just stupid. You are being stupid. Stop being stupid. Stop being stupid and then hold these terrorists to account for their deliberate terrorist actions that are putting innocent people in danger. If these people were sincere about grievances, then they’d be protesting with peacefully organized picket marches, not using their children to throw hand grenades near locations like preschools or planting improvised explosives to kill as many civilians as possible. Islam has its own set of history and you should not be conflating or substituting the suffering of the Sami people under Sweden’s shameful and barbaric government policies of the past as a justification for the benign treatment given to Islamic terrorists. You should not be holding back the appropriate use of force against terrorists who are clearly seeking to destroy your country and making no secret about it every time they use children to blow up civilian centers.

Islam’s own history explains what their intentions are. The truth is that they behave this way, precisely because they view you as weak. Unfortunately, they will almost certainly start attempting to commit grooming gangs just like in Great Britain, Pakistan, and India. They’ll almost certainly be trying to force female children into becoming their slave girls. Historically, they always seek out the ethnic backgrounds that are most vulnerable in society. In other words, they’ll likely try to groom and gang rape the Sami people because their 7^th century Arab fundamentalist mindset will make them perceive the Sami people as the weakest in society. It is not racist or a joke to say that, because their religion justifies such behavior, it happens throughout the Arab Spring even now, and Islam teaches them that the Abrahamic God will forgive the women when Muslims force them into prostitution, which will include gang raping young girls. That is the truth about the history of Islam and ignoring that truth results in grooming gang violence in Great Britain, India, and other countries they seek to Islamize. Please re-read Chapter Three, if you think any of that is bigotry. It is no different than Catholic child rape cases; it is real and it is something that you need to make sure that you’re on top of to prevent, or children – the most vulnerable in society – are going to be the ones that will suffer and the most likely targets will be Sami children just like they did in Great Britain to primarily working-class children.

Neoliberals and Marxists Do Not Value Culture

One core issue that should be addressed and which is shared by both Neoliberals and Marxists; why do they behave as if reality and consequences don’t matter or don’t exist? It is very strange how these opposing groups behave the same, but for diametrically opposed economic reasons. There’re two chief reasons why: first, both Marxists and Neoliberals have no culture. They don’t view culture as real value systems; they don’t understand how culture impacts governing systems and that these governing systems aren’t immutable. They confuse governments created and shaped by people as divinely-inspired and thus immune from evidence-based reasoning, because they lack even the most basic principles of philosophical thought. They have no critical thinking when it comes to philosophy; Marxists believe that it doesn’t matter as part of the bedrock of Marxist economic theory and Neoliberals simply don’t think about it or view it with derision despite the fact that the wealthy Neoliberals are always lobbying political systems that grew from these philosophical views. This is also why they turn their economic theories into a bizarre religious orthodoxy that they argue is indisputable and that no philosophical system is allowed to argue against. The only focus they have is in the sense-object of future monetary gains and they view culture as simply interchangeable noise, because they have no culture themselves. What happens? The Neoliberals and the Marxists both turn their economic theories into identity politics and Neoliberals in particular try to substitute their specific, extremist brand of capitalism for all of capitalism. They deliberately ignore the variety of capitalist systems to push for their specific identity-based ideology of capitalism.

The second reason is willful ignorance. They actively seek only confirmatory information and ignore all evidence-based reasoning that they believe goes “too far” or is “too extreme” which challenges what is little more than an identity-based faith tradition. Marxists do this on Discord and reddit internet forums, in public speaking events, and in their Youtube videos. Neoliberals do this when lobbying their policies in secret to politicians and giving them millions in campaign finance as incentives to pursue their specific economic agenda. When questioning Marxists on their beliefs, they’ll come-up with the most incoherent arguments asking if people who question them know the difference between a variety of Marxist theories instead of actually putting in the effort to explain how such an economic system could ever work in reality and then they mock those who simply question them on the realistic applicability of their economic theory. Neoliberals typically refuse to even have discussions and simply accuse you of being Marxist or a Socialist for simply questioning how their specific, extremist branch of capitalism can even work in the long-term. I’d argue that Marxists simply believe in a fantasy world and those capitalists tricked into conflating Neoliberalism with all forms of capitalist economic theories have confused people questioning them as harboring some form of evil or hate, which is also ridiculous. Moreover, the Conservatives that have abandoned Neoliberalism and who are now accusing Neoliberals of being evil and hateful, are assuming too much in their intent. It might be more accurate to say that the wealthy Neoliberal elite and Neoliberal economists are simply ignorant and greedy. The Neoliberal elite only think about future earnings from future gains in profit and don’t realize Islamism is a political ideology that is absolutely serious about reverting every aspect of human life back into a 7^th century standard; there will be no future economic rewards for all the damage done from Islamic immigration. There’s no massive payout at the end of all the bombings, shootings, stabbings, and economic damage done to Western Europe. The European public have a legitimate right to be angry with the Neoliberal elite. The Neoliberal elite only have themselves to blame for not using their millions and billions in resources to learn more about Islamic culture before pushing for policies of massive immigration to offset the reduced labor capacity. There’s no justification for not doing any research; they were so stupid that they didn’t think of the obvious threat after horrific events like September 11^th, 2001 and the ensuing terrorist attacks that have happened since then throughout multiple countries too numerous to mention in brief.

The reason this continues to be a problem is that the neoliberal elite have vehemently chosen to commit to “analyses” that lack in reality-based thinking to preserve their own power and social status, but at the expense of anything that criticizes what is effectively what Daniel Kahneman referred to as theory-induced blindness.[1] Take for example the most recent case of Neoliberal ideologues peddling their beliefs within their paywall think tanks like in Foreign Affairs, so that the majority of the US public doesn’t learn about it and therefore can’t judge it. I refer to the corrosive and disastrous influence of Jason Furman’s economic policies throughout his years serving under President Clinton, the World Bank, and President Obama. However, you may be wondering, who is Jason Furman and why does his Pro-Neoliberal stance matter and does he really have much influence? Well, how about judging him based upon his own stated achievements? Here is his brief biography made on Foreign Affairs to explain his “accomplishments” and his competence in arguing for economic policies:

In this case, Jason Furman’s recent article on Foreign Affairs titled “The Post-Neoliberal Delusion” and published on February 10^th, 2025 where he makes this very odd claim:

This information is actually false. What’s particularly odd is that there were numerous news articles citing monthly and annual survey results from Bank Rate Monitor, a website and originally a financial magazine chiefly read by the Banking sector, that provides free resources to help anyone interested in improving their financial situations. Jason Furman claims there was an “excess savings” by Americans during the pandemic, but self-reported survey results from regular Americans published by Bankrate’s Principal US economic reporter, Sarah Foster, completely disproves this claim. In her article published on July 21^st, 2021, titled “Survey: More than half of Americans couldn’t cover three months of expenses with an emergency fund” she revealed the following datasets from the survey:

And later on in the same article:

And her methodology was perfectly credible:

This only took me a quick google search of around twenty minutes or less. A Neoliberal elite like Jason Furman surely has more capital, manpower, and other resources than I do. So, why did he cite Krugman instead of taking the time to read through credible surveys that would challenge his argument? The answer may lie with Political Scientists Jacob S. Pierson and Paul Hacker’s critique of Neoliberal economic policies impacts on Presidential and Congressional election campaigns. In their magnum opus, “Winner-Take-All Politics How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class” the pair make the case that the wealthy politicians, especially during the second President Bush’s administration, only viewed the wealthy elite as their voter base and never concerned themselves with the broader public during this time.[1] To people like Jason Furman and his fellow Neoliberals, the only opposing side they see are those accepted within their own wealthy circles; no facts and evidence matter outside of their in-group of the wealthy elite. The broader public is just angry and contradictory noise to them. It is very likely that to the neoliberal elite, the neoliberals of the wider public are just their useful idiots in all practical sense. Something to give an awkward thumbs-up and quote as a means of support for their own preconceived notions, but not people worthy of equal consideration when there is a divergence in viewpoint and especially not for any possible reformation of neoliberal economic theory itself. They certainly will never acknowledge that Neoliberalism as an economic theory has brought poverty to the US and the West. Neoliberalism has simply failed in its claims; yet, this inconvenient fact is ignored despite multiple bailouts within the US and for countries like Greece, the weakening of the European Union, and the rise of China.

By transforming their economic theory into their identity due to their lack of culture and refusal to acknowledge inconvenient facts that disprove their economic orthodoxy, they have sold out entire countries to 7^th century Islamism’s attempts to break them to pieces, while ordering their jester-journalists to conflate nationalism with Nazism by using terms like far-right because they genuinely don’t understand the value of culture at all. They don’t distinguish between nationalism and Nazism because they lack even the basic education to understand the difference due to only being educated in economic theories and only being motivated by future gains in profits that’ll never come. The false premise that Muslim enclaves will automatically Westernize is simply taken for granted on the basis of Western Universalism and this premise is used to shut down all legitimate criticisms. The Neoliberal elite merely bark at their jester-journalists to make articles that imply anything that disagrees or questions the notion of religious tolerance is far-right. Anything that points to Muslim enclaves being unwilling to adapt is accused of being far-right and conflated to be a form of Nazism despite the lack of clear definition of what is Far-right about this criticism. Fascism has been repurposed to mean some arbitrary and self-serving criteria for the Neoliberal elite to quash dissent without any clear definition; instead of meaning the original term of ultraorthodox Catholicism and the entwining of race with nationalism, it has been hurled as an insult for conservative groups from Britain, to Ireland, to France, to Sweden, to the Netherlands, to India, and to the US. Essentially, anything that disagrees with the notion of religious tolerance and the desire to question Islamic religious doctrines is viewed as far-right and fascist. Ultimately, the jester-journalists of the corporate media and the Neoliberal elite are the ultimate guard dogs of the Islamist takeover and destruction of all non-Muslim cultures.

 

Of Aztecs and Indians

Lastly, a philosophical concept that has helped me to better understand the social issues of what both the Woke and Neoliberal elite’s ignorance has wrought upon chiefly Western civilizations is James Maffie’s arguments of how the Mexica / Aztec viewed their society in their own theological and philosophical terms. In brief, Maffie claims, and provides extensive research in support of this claim, that the Mexica viewed their society in a horizontal and nonhierarchical social system of the Center containing the majority of the population and a two or four-sided periphery containing various groups that tried to tug and pull the Center to their respective side to obtain favor.[2] In my own reconceptualization of Mexica philosophy, the Center is the majority population and the Periphery are various interest groups and idealogues like the Neoliberal elite such as Jason Furman who seek to curry favor and obtain social power over the Center via tugging against other Peripheries who have opposing views. This philosophical concept, which I currently believe is well-supported based upon the copious amounts of evidence that James Maffie has given for how the Mexica constituted their society in their own philosophical terms, surprisingly helped me to understand precisely why Cancel Culture and turning race, gender, and economic theories into identity politics was doomed to fail. Effectively, the tug-of-war in democratic societies is Free Speech. When the Neoliberal elite secretly lobby without the general public’s general awareness or knowledge within the periphery and then tries to justify their lobbying via saying their economic policies cannot be argued at all, then the general public has a natural distrust of such methods. For the Woke Left, it is even more ridiculous. First, the Woke Left argue the Center is bigoted and when anyone in the Center questions the Woke Left about their perspectives, the Woke Left respond by blocking and “cancelling” the Center and they keep using this method of cancellation to create a receding wall of ignorance into the Periphery. They view and discuss issues with like-minded individuals as a way of “seeing themselves” within their own community of the Periphery of society. The Woke Left proceed to get shocked when the Center doesn’t vote in their favor after cancelling themselves into irrelevance from the Center, seeking only to “see themselves” with like-minded individuals within the Periphery, and then acting with astonishment when the Center doesn’t support their views after completely failing to communicate what their views are and being completely unwilling to accept criticism of their views. This sounds like a satirical skit, except this is what is actually happening in societies due to basing views on personal feelings instead of our individual reasoning skills. What has been filling the void of these failures wrought by Western Universalism, which continues to pursue Cancel Culture as an off-shoot of Religious Tolerance? The unrestrained rise of the 7^th Century Arab fundamentalist ideology of Islamism.

India knows well what happens when you can’t criticize Islamism in society and everyone else in India is forced to suffer the consequences every year under threat of riots from the large Muslim populations that still exist within India over fear of offense. The feelings of Muslims supersede the lives of those they harm. The fact that Hindus, Hindutva, and the broader BJP party are portrayed as “far-right” is laughably asinine; but the jester-journalists of the US corporate media circus destroying their credibility should come as no surprise. After all, they refused to ever write or publish any news stories of the New Zealand-funded Baptist Christian terrorist groups within India for about twenty-five years and still don’t mention them.[3][4] A cursory look at the Wikipedia page of terrorism in India makes it clear which groups are the most dangerous. Within India’s contemporary history, while it is true that some terrorist attacks are due to various groups from the Hindu Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka, to Naxal / Maoist-variant Communist terrorist groups, to Khalistani terrorists, and Baptist Christian terrorists (the Christian terrorists are barely listed in the Wikipedia page, because apparently the feelings of White Christian Europeans supersede the harm that Baptist Christian terror funding from countries like New Zealand does to Indians of different backgrounds); they all make-up approximately twenty to thirty percent judging from the Wikipedia’s accounting and they mostly occurred in the 1980s – 90s. Approximately an overwhelming 58 percent of the Wikipedia listings of terrorism, especially contemporary terrorism in India that is as annual as the seasonal weather changes, comes from various Islamist terrorist groups. This is the reality of a country being strangled to prevent any discussion about the problems of Islam:

To Islamists, Compassion is Weakness meant to be exploited to further Islamism

Islamism is a real political ideology; even after a mass genocide of 80 million people for approximately 700 – 800 years of ruling India, even after breaking India into two pieces due to the stupidity of British imperialists in the partition of 1947, and even after the genocide of Kashmir . . . Islamists never stopped. Islamists don’t care about the harm they do to others and treat it all as a conspiracy against them. Why did Europeans believe that Western Universalism could stop them? Those Muslim enclaves are just the first step in the process of Islamization and overwhelming proof that they don’t care about adapting to Western values. Instead of the sense-object of future monetary gains that the Neoliberal elites expected from mass immigration, you should expect the future of European countries like Great Britain and Sweden to be similar to Israel-Palestine and Kashmir. That is, military no-go zones filled with Islamic terrorism with attempts to breakaway to form their own caliphates. The Neoliberal elite and their jester-journalist dogs of the corporate media circus, in an effort to insinuate all forms of nationalism are a form of fascism and an effort to compartmentalize all Islamic violence by ignoring Islamist ideologies, have unalterably destroyed Western Europe and seek to destroy the United States in the same way. Neoliberal economic policy and Western Universalism have led only to Islamism being given an open-door and helping hand to reverting the entire world into 7^th century standards technologically, politically, socially, and culturally. As the Neoliberal elite, Woke Left, and jester-journalists continue to shield their religious values from criticism; Islamists continue unchallenged in their stalwart belief that it is necessary to regress all non-Muslim societies to bring about the Islamic version of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

I sincerely hope that I’m proven wrong, but you should ask yourselves; why is Sweden being destroyed from within from the consequences of compassionate Islamic immigration? Why does Sweden get repeatedly criticized for failing to deal with Islamic terrorism as if they’re incompetent, but no such criticism is given to China by Muslims across the world for its repressive policies upon the Uyghurs in what is recognized as a genocide by mostly European countries? Why do Muslim-majority countries outside of Turkey remain silent about it? Why is there such a stark contrast between Muslim-majority reactions to Sweden which is being bombed by Muslim children throwing hand grenades at preschools, while China enforces a military-designed detention after they had to stop multiple Islamic terrorist incidents from Uyghur Muslims? China has suffered multiple terrorist attacks between 2010 – 2016 due to Islamic Uyghur terrorism; which includes a foiled attempt at stealing a jetliner to commit a 9/11 style attack by Uyghur Muslim terrorists back in June 29^th, 2012.[1] They suffered Islamic terrorism sporadically in the early 1990s and the early 2000s too. It was only after six years of unrelenting Islamic terrorism in the 2010s that China implemented the Uyghur Muslim concentration camps. Why do Western Europeans and the US criticize China, but the Islamic monarchies and Muslim-majority populations in countries like Pakistan don’t criticize China over the Uyghur genocide? To the West, it is seen as a horrific human rights atrocity, but to the 7^th century Arab fundamentalist thinking of Islam, Sweden is “weak” for not using a greater use of force upon Syrian and Iraqi Muslims and China is “strong” for using a greater use of force upon Uyghur Muslims, therefore Muslim-majorities will not criticize China. You can lie to yourselves about why this distinction is occurring all you want; this is the actual truth of the matter.

Finally, never lie to yourselves about this fundamental truth about these problems: the Neoliberal Capitalists hold far more blame than the Marxists for these problems, because they’re the ones who lobbied and funded campaigns for these policies of mass immigration to politicians in the billions, whereas the Woke and other cultural Marxists are just outspokenly espousing the values that the Neoliberal elites want to pursue. The Marxists and the Woke may be the louder group, but the ones with true culpability for all the violence and terrorism that Western Europe is suffering are the Neoliberal elites and their jester-journalist dogs of the corporate media circus.

To be continued in Chapter VI . . . Did the British Partition of 1947 Gradually Decline the UK and Bolster India?

---

Chapter 5

 

1. Bhaumik, Subir. “South Asia | ‘Church Backing Tripura Rebels.’” BBC News, BBC, 18 Apr. 2000, news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/717775.stm.
2. Dearden, Lizzie. “Grooming Gangs Abused More than 700 Women and Girls around Newcastle after Police Appeared to Punish Victims.” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 23 Feb. 2018, independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-uk-britain-newcastle-serious-case-review-operation-sanctuary-shelter-muslim-asian-a8225106.html.
3. Foster, Sarah. “Survey: More than Half of Americans Couldn’t Cover Three Months of Expenses with Emergency Savings.” Edited by Brian Beers, Bankrate, SRS Omnibus, 22 Oct. 2024, bankrate.com/banking/savings/emergency-savings-survey-july-2021/.
4. France 24. “Sweden’s ‘truth Commission’ Delves into Painful Sami Past.” France 24, FRANCE 24, 5 Oct. 2023, france24.com/en/live-news/20230510-sweden-s-truth-commission-delves-into-painful-sami-past.
5. Furman, Jason. “Jason Furman.” Foreign Affairs, 30 Oct. 2024, foreignaffairs.com/authors/jason-furman.
6. Furman, Jason. “The Post-Neoliberal Delusion.” Foreign Affairs, 10 February 2025, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/post-neoliberal-delusion. Accessed 28 March 2025.
7. “German Federal Court Overturns ‘Sharia Police’ Acquittals.” AP News, AP News, 11 Jan. 2018, apnews.com/article/525f089c10ae4417b48b368cd6fb3357.
8. Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. Winner-Take-All Politics How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Simon & Schuster, 2011.
9. Kahneman, Daniel. Chapter 25: Bernoulli’s Errors (276) and Chapter 26: The Prospect Theory (278-288). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015.
10. Maffie, James. Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion. University Press of Colorado. Kindle Edition.
11. Maxwell, Emerald, and Caroline Sinz. “Focus: Women Made to Keep Low Profile in Some French Suburbs.” YouTube, FRANCE 24 English, 19 Dec. 2016, youtube.com/watch?v=6gZFGpNdH1A&ab_channel=FRANCE24English.
12. “Modern Slavery in United Arab Emirates.” Walk Free, 22 Aug. 2023, walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/country-studies/united-arab-emirates/.
13. Moore, Malcolm. “Chinese Plane in Xinjiang Hijack Attempt.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 29 June 2012, telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/9365032/Chinese-plane-in-Xinjiang-hijack-attempt.html. For Reference: Chinese state media said six people on board Tianjin Airlines flight GS7554 from Hotan to Urumqi had tried to “violently” take over the plane ten minutes after take-off.Xinjiang has seen sporadic violence over the past few years between local Muslim Uighurs and Han Chinese migrants. The authorities have repeatedly blamed violence on Uighur separatists bent on splitting Xinjiang into an independent state.A spokesman for the provincial government said the six hijackers had been Uighurs. “At the moment, we do not know the purpose of the hijack. It is still under investigation.”The hijackers were rapidly overpowered by crew and passengers, but seven people were injured in the fracas. The flight returned to Hotan airport and the six people were arrested.One anonymous woman, tweeting on a company account called She Lan Tang, claimed to relay information from a witness on board.”They [the hijackers] went straight for the cockpit but failed,” she wrote. “It is said the cockpit doors have all been strengthened after 9/11. One security guard was severely injured though.” She added: “They brought a football-sized bomb onto the plane. Also, after all the other passengers were checked [by police] they found a seventh accomplice.”
14. Price, Greg. “SPLC Apologizes to Falsely Labeled Foundation.” Newsweek, Newsweek, 18 June 2018, newsweek.com/splc-nawaz-million-apologizes-981879.
15. Savage, Maddy. “Sweden’s 100 Explosions This Year: What’s Going On?” BBC News, BBC, 12 Nov. 2019, bbc.com/news/world-europe-50339977.
16. Szumski, Charles. “‘No Control’: Sweden Grapples with Bomb Violence Wave.” Eurasia Review, EurActiv, 31 Jan. 2025, eurasiareview.com/31012025-no-control-sweden-grapples-with-bomb-violence-wave/.
17. Tiwary, Deeptiman. “Centre Signs Peace Pact with Tripura Insurgent Outfit Nlft.” The Indian Express, The Indian Express, 10 Aug. 2019, indianexpress.com/article/india/centre-signs-peace-pact-with-tripura-insurgent-outfit-nlft-5895406/.
18. Wagner, Sally Roesch. Sisters in Spirit: Iroquois Influence on Early Feminists: Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Influence on Early American Feminists. Book Publishing Company. Kindle Edition.
19. Wikipedia contributors. “List of terrorist incidents in India.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 5 Jan. 2025. Web. 30 Mar. 2025.

---

Endnotes

[1] Moore, Malcolm. “Chinese Plane in Xinjiang Hijack Attempt.” The Telegraph, Telegraph Media Group, 29 June 2012, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/9365032/Chinese-plane-in-Xinjiang-hijack-attempt.html.

[1] Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. Winner-Take-All Politics How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Simon & Schuster, 2011.

[2] Maffie, James. Aztec Philosophy: Understanding a World in Motion. University Press of Colorado. Kindle Edition.

[3] Bhaumik, Subir. “South Asia | ‘Church Backing Tripura Rebels.’” BBC News, BBC, 18 Apr. 2000, news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/south_asia/717775.stm.

[4] Tiwary, Deeptiman. “Centre Signs Peace Pact with Tripura Insurgent Outfit Nlft.” The Indian Express, The Indian Express, 10 Aug. 2019, indianexpress.com/article/india/centre-signs-peace-pact-with-tripura-insurgent-outfit-nlft-5895406/.

[1] Kahneman, Daniel. Chapter 25: Bernoulli’s Errors (276) and Chapter 26: The Prospect Theory (278-288). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015.

[1] France 24. “Sweden’s ‘truth Commission’ Delves into Painful Sami Past.” France 24, FRANCE 24, 5 Oct. 2023, www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230510-sweden-s-truth-commission-delves-into-painful-sami-past.

[1] Savage, Maddy. “Sweden’s 100 Explosions This Year: What’s Going On?” BBC News, BBC, 12 Nov. 2019, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50339977.

[2] Savage, Maddy. “Sweden’s 100 Explosions This Year: What’s Going On?” BBC News, BBC, 12 Nov. 2019, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50339977.

[3] Savage, Maddy. “Sweden’s 100 Explosions This Year: What’s Going On?” BBC News, BBC, 12 Nov. 2019, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50339977.

[1] Price, Greg. “SPLC Apologizes to Falsely Labeled Foundation.” Newsweek, Newsweek, 18 June 2018, www.newsweek.com/splc-nawaz-million-apologizes-981879.

[2] Price, Greg. “SPLC Apologizes to Falsely Labeled Foundation.” Newsweek, Newsweek, 18 June 2018, www.newsweek.com/splc-nawaz-million-apologizes-981879.

[3] Dearden, Lizzie. “Grooming Gangs Abused More than 700 Women and Girls around Newcastle after Police Appeared to Punish Victims.” The Independent, Independent Digital News and Media, 23 Feb. 2018, www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-uk-britain-newcastle-serious-case-review-operation-sanctuary-shelter-muslim-asian-a8225106.html.

[4] “German Federal Court Overturns ‘Sharia Police’ Acquittals.” AP News, AP News, 11 Jan. 2018, apnews.com/article/525f089c10ae4417b48b368cd6fb3357.

[5] Maxwell, Emerald, and Caroline Sinz. “Focus: Women Made to Keep Low Profile in Some French Suburbs.” YouTube, FRANCE 24 English, 19 Dec. 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gZFGpNdH1A&ab_channel=FRANCE24English.

[6] “Modern Slavery in United Arab Emirates.” Walk Free, 22 Aug. 2023, www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/country-studies/united-arab-emirates/.

[7] Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. Winner-Take-All Politics How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Simon & Schuster, 2011.

[8] Wagner, Sally Roesch. Sisters in Spirit: Iroquois Influence on Early Feminists: Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Influence on Early American Feminists. Book Publishing Company. Kindle Edition.