Purely my limited personal opinion on scenarios that could legitimately end the US-Israeli relationship once the US’s greed for Iranian oil and economic opportunities is satisfied:

Let’s just go over two plausible scenarios and a third unlikely scenario:

1. Israel and Iran begin a war, Russia backs up Iran and the US backs-up Israel. Presumably, China will back up Russia and Iran too. In which case, we now have a plausible World War 3 scenario since Russia is still warring against Ukraine. It becomes anyone’s win or loss with US hegemony becoming threatened completely because of Israel’s actions. This doesn’t help US national interests.
2. Iran doesn’t get aid from other countries, the US gets involved, and the US deposes the Iranian government; albeit we’d have to deal with massive protests, insurgencies, mass violence, and long-term terror attacks on US soil because the Iranians will absolutely find a way. Unfortunately, perhaps some unsavory actions committed by miniscule troops, unless Israeli troops are also on the ground in which case the rape crimes against Iranian women will likely skyrocket. The ignorant, stupid, incompetent US politicians – just like all their previous fuck-ups as per their lack of brain matter – will try to add Arabs to the table like Saudi Arabia. This will intensify hatred and violence on a scale in which Iranians would be willing to blow-up their own country in a nuclear holocaust in the vicinity of every surrounding region of their country before they ever, EVER suffer under 200 years of brutal Arab genocidal rule ever again. I’m of the opinion that they’d rather die first than ever suffer under the 7^th century Islamic fundamentalists that destroyed their civilization for over 200 years. Israel would be perceived as the Arab countries useful idiot and likely be destroyed for forcing Iran to suffer Arab colonization again. Never underestimate how much the Iranians have suffered under and hate the Arabs. 200 years of genocidal colonization should not be ignored as a motivational factor for Iranian actions; Iran’s hatred and fear of Arabs – which far surpasses animosity towards either Israel or the US – is absolutely justified based upon Iranian history of 200 years of Islamic conquest and we Americans need to be realistic. Incompetent US policymakers need to grow a brain and become more informed about the history of places they seek to hold dominion over to preserve US hegemony. These are the scions of ancient Persia who rivaled Ancient Rome on equal footing, they’re going to die for their country if threatened with any perceived colonization, no matter what. As far as I see it, beyond just the growing hostility over decades of mutual military assassinations, US ties to the Arab world are the real reasons between mutual animosity between the US and Iran. This dooms US national interests forever.
3. Aha! Let’s assume Iran wouldn’t be willing to nuke their own country to avoid suffering under another humiliating Arab defeat and the US successfully replaces its government and there is no call for destruction of all surrounding lands by any means necessary rather than suffer under the brutalization of Arab dominance ever again. Let’s assume such a fantasy could ever be true:

Iran’s government changes into a secular republic, Iranians get more freedoms, and the US’s only condition is Iranian oil is sold on the US dollar to further US hegemony and control over the world’s most vital energy supply with our US weapons industry supplying their military with higher grade weapons. The US and Iran will quickly become the best of friends, because Iranians will have easier access to the history of what the Arabs stole from them, the destruction of their indigenous culture, and the fact that the original anti-Slavery religion was Zoroastrianism. Albeit, they’ll probably ask us Americans for limits on US Sanction powers in exchange for keeping oil on the US dollar.

Just imagine this: The people who rivaled Ancient Rome reclaim their lost lineage and culture thanks to actually being able to build a Republic and Islam being muted. There’ll still be societal and social problems, but Iranian adaption to Western Values – which is honestly the most similar remaining culture to their own ancient anti-slavery monotheistic culture in modern times – well, it is already proven to be one of the biggest successes in the US itself among Iranian Americans. Iranian Americans leave Islam faster than other groups in the US because the US’s First Amendment allows them to learn more clearly of Islam’s role in the annihilation of their anti-slavery culture to impose a culture of sexual slavery of women traded in Slave Markets under Islam. The present Iranians of Iran may also despise us because, in a very real way that most Americans might find shocking, we mimic a modern form of what their indigenous anti-slavery monotheistic culture could have become if it hadn’t been genocided out of Iran by Islamic imperialism. They “hate our values” because they know the origin of those values was their own indigenous culture which gets no credit because of the imperialism they suffered under Arab rule for 200 years. Once Iran questions and gets rid of Islam, we’d suddenly find endless things to like about each other and many Christians in the US might find it fascinating that Iran’s original culture of Zoroastrianism was fervently anti-Slavery in its theology and its culture was the origin of the concept of good and evil. Americans would suddenly find themselves fascinated with Iranian culture after distinguishing it from the barbaric culture of 7^th century Arab fundamentalism known more popularly as Islam. Another Monotheistic culture with a strong anti-Slavery tradition from ancient times? American Conservatives would probably be the most intrigued.

The elites would likely encourage this for one reason alone: to keep selling oil on the US dollar and to stabilize relations for larger trade between countries. Now, if the US has fully stabilized relations and Iran agrees to sell oil on the US dollar… well, they already hate Arabs because of the whole “genocided their culture for 200 years including selling women into sexual slavery as part of Arab conquest” so… they’d be enthusiastic about buying US weapons in that context of already selling oil on the US dollar and having us agree to limit or preclude any sanctions on their country. Iran and the Gulf Allies of the US would be using US-made weapons for proxy wars against each other in this new geopolitical context to test US weapons to further US hegemony. If this ever became a reality . . . why would the US ever need Israel for anything, ever again? We could continue the arms race of having weapons sold between Iran and the Arab countries, because the animosity, distrust, and abject loathing towards Arabs is very real for Iranians for completely justifiable reasons that have to do with maintaining their own survival. This would maintain the US’s weapons sale and safeguard US interests with the petrodollar. Israel would just be a useless nuisance for the US in this context. I’m not even joking. Once the US has Iranian oil sold on the US dollar . . . what’s the point of any relationship with Israel any longer? We used them and got what we wanted from them at that point, right? What plausible geopolitical reason would there be to support them any further outside of rationalizing reasons for idiotic religious beliefs in a Messiah such as Jesus Christ’s non-existent second coming?

If anything, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s support for a war on Iran… would mean that the US helps Iran shift policy and turns Israel into Iran’s vassal state against the Arabs since Iran would then have a bigger GDP, better military weaponry purchased directly from the US, better ready and trained forces that far surpass Israel’s numbers, and would be working in cooperation with the US in that context. It’d be a permanent shift in the Balance of Power with Iran becoming a regional power that coincides with US national interests.

If number three comes to pass, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s lasting historic legacy will have been permanently degrading the US-Israel special relationship into turning Israel into Iran’s vassal state under US-Iran’s new special relationship being balanced with the US’s real number 1 ally, Saudi Arabia. There’s very good reasons to believe this is plausible once Iran sells oil on the US Dollar and purchases US weapons: The Balance of Power would shift, the US State department would work tirelessly to appease Iranian regional interests above Israel’s national interests, the US would have to balance Iran and Saudi Arabia’s interests and hostilities as the number one priority, the US would likely covertly blow Israel’s nuclear facilities to satisfy Iran, and the primary reason this would be true is that Iran would be selling their oil to countries with large populations like India and China on the US dollar; think of how much money the US’s One Percent would gain from such a long-lasting trade deal. Now, add tens of billions of dollars in annual weapons sales comparable to Saudi Arabia buying $97 billion in US weapons in just 2013 and then 20 or 30 billion more of commercial US imports that Iran would purchase because. . . oh yes, Iranians like American products and they use VPNs today to use US social media for fun. So, you have oil sold on the US dollar, weapons testing and purchases between mutual animosity through proxies between two core US allies of Saudi Arabia and then Iran in this context to keep the balance of power in the Middle East stable for US hegemony, and Israel would literally become a nuisance to US self-interests in an already delicate balance of appeasing Saudi and Iranian interests. If, in this third scenario, Iran and Saudi Arabia set aside mutual hatred and brought the US State department into a secret meeting insisting that Israel must pull out of the West Bank and Gaza or there’d be limits to how much oil is sold on the US dollar . . . would the US appease both these countries or would they side with Israel over a special relationship? Because what on earth is the value for the US’s national interests to side with Israel at that point?

The more I think about it, apart from the Epstein files controversy, Prime Minister Netanyahu is just a useful bulldog for the US State department and Israel is the US’s cheap whore constantly needing $3 billion to suck off from US taxpayers every year and take the blame for furthering US national interests in solidifying our hegemony.

I couldn’t help but think of making this meme when thinking about this. If anyone disagrees with me, feel free to explain why. I’m totally open to listening, especially on such serious matters. Sorry if it seems counterintuitive, this issue kept coming up in my mind for some reason, especially when I compare Iranian history and Iran’s indigenous culture to the US’s culture. If Islam was thrown away, Iran might be more willing to work alongside US interests, if both parties also apologized for any humans rights violence in the near-past and the US agreed to stop using sanctions so ruthlessly. To the best of my knowledge, the Arabs never apologized to Iran for the 200 years of genocide, so it seems more plausible to me that the US and Iran would get along better before the Arab countries and Iran ever do and with the current growing animosity towards Israel? Who knows what the policy shifts could be in the near-future or within the next twenty years. With so much money and economic opportunity involved, this would be the real incentive for ending the US-Israel partnership to the benefit of US interests. If it’s implausible, then it is implausible, but Benjamin Netanyahu (Original family name: Miliekowsky) seems hellbent on making one of these three scenarios happen.