Slight Update on 7/15/2025: I’m very sorry if this seems as if I’m trying to politicize the late Virginia Giuffre’s death; I hope writing this doesn’t cause any pain or further trauma for her family and other Rape Survivors’ families. My sincerest apologies, if that is the case or if anything I’ve said here seems callous. That is absolutely not my intention. Unfortunately, when no other perpetrators are caught and when it reaches such national publicity in the US, it does need to be talked about because it’s yet another in a long-chain of incidents where Rape Survivors are ignored. I’m very sorry if it seems as if I’m politicizing any of this, these are just my honest thoughts. I’ve also had to make a slight correction as the trafficking seems to be estimated to have been ongoing for approximately seventeen years. I’ve also added extra information and added a few new links. I hope you all are in good health and doing well.

7/16/2025 further update: Further corrections as the timeline is approximately 17 years and not twenty. My sincerest apologies for that mistake. I’m still in shock and I thought a high-profile case like this would obviously lead to more convictions. I don’t know what to expect anymore.

---

I’m writing this because I’m genuinely disturbed by how the US Corporate news media has shamelessly and willfully politicized this issue and seems to be deliberately ignoring the fact that the origin of much of the accusations of multiple wealthy people having raped the women when they were underage girls has come from the testimonies of the women themselves. A question for you all; are they deliberately trying to stoke partisanship and hatred between people in order to conflate MAGA rage with the testimonies of the Rape Survivors in order to silence the Rape Survivors? The reason for the MAGA rage of these “far-right” MAGA people… is because they’re angry that the Rape Survivors aren’t going to get justice. The Corporate Mainstream news media of the United States is deliberately and willfully mocking them for that and trying to portray them as crazy for believing the Rape Survivors. Why are Liberal-leaning Democrats and Liberal-leaning Independents so eagerly falling into this mockery campaign, when they know it means that the Rape Survivors will never get justice for what was done to them for over a decade? Am I imagining this, or did a lot of people seem to just fanatically jump on this, knowing it means the Rape Survivors will never get the justice they deserve, just to feel superior to MAGA supporters and how is the US Corporate news media not willfully encouraging such behavior that they know is effectively gloating at the fact that Rape Survivors will never get justice? It seems like a concerted and alarming pattern to deliberately silence the Rape Survivors.

All of that is extremely disturbing to see. Irrespective of why you think the Trump Administration made such a decision, that’s effectively what it means. The idea that Epstein and Maxwell alone did this and that there were no other perpetrators in a scandal that he was able to get away with for nearly two decades and in multiple residences begs credulity. Moreover, many people seem ready to ignore what the victims actually said in order to concoct their own harebrained reasons for why no one else is going to be charged. I’m looking at comments made by supposedly Left-leaning individuals eager to make-up their own fictions on why Virginia Giuffre must’ve had a mental breakdown by taking her words out of context. It just seems like people are eager to silence the Rape Survivors because they either don’t really care or they don’t want to know. My question is… why do we live in a world where the US government seems more interested in providing evidence and support for the ICC case against Russia’s child trafficking ring than the sex trafficking of underage American girls by Jeffrey Epstein within the US itself? Why are we so readily willing to believe that governments in other countries can commit conspiracy theories, but not our own, when it is all human-made institutions that are prone to human error, ego, and selfishness like anything else? For example, why is the Ayotzinapa scandal of Mexico more believable to us than a cover-up by our own government?

The difference between the US Corporate news media and US government’s behavior towards Ukrainian child-trafficking victims and the attempt to use MAGA hate as a way to ignore the US Rape Survivors of Epstein is far too much of a tonal whiplash for me. Even looking at past events, the erratic behavior of the US Corporate news media just seems gradually increasing in insanity. When Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing for Supreme Court justice was happening, the US Corporate media did everything they could to intentionally slander the man; referring to the testimony of his accuser as a “#MeToo test” and dogging Republican politicians who voted to confirm him. Yet, when its announced the Trump administration won’t be pursuing justice for Rape Survivors due to purportedly coming up empty, the US Corporate news media try to spread partisan hate by treating it as far-right MAGA conspiracy theories, trying to argue that around a thousand victims were all raped by Jeffrey Epstein alone which is a deliberate and willful attempt to ignore the testimony of Rape Survivors who suffered child trafficking, and they seem to be trying to deliberately conflate the Rape Survivor testimonies with MAGA “conspiracy theories” in order to shut down criticism and foster mutual hate so that this gets quickly buried. After less than a day of mockery articles disparaging MAGA supporters for wanting justice for Child Rape victims, they quickly tried to move on almost immediately as if a nation-wide and nearly two decades-long scandal coming up with no other perpetrators isn’t worthy news to discuss. Liberals (mainly Centrists) are largely the ones mocking MAGA supporters for this and I have to ask; what is even Liberal priorities and policies then? What are American values anymore? Why do Liberals on Twitter spend so much time mocking and insulting people for over a decade-old comments on Twitter that they label misogynistic, but when MAGA groups are sharing videos of interviews of Rape Survivors and commenting how disheartened they are that Rape Survivors will never receive justice and their testimonies have been ignored, then US Liberals mock this as “obvious” that women who were trafficked into a pedophile ring as children would never receive justice for having the courage to come out as Rape Survivors? The US Corporate news media seemed insistent on believing all women when it came to partisanship and even called it a #MeToo test in one headline against Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation from what I recall, but when it comes to confirmed rape victims who were trafficked as children and this sex trafficking of children went on for nearly two decades, then it’s conveniently a MAGA conspiracy that more than just Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in the child rape crimes? They believe they can just have it sidestepped and immediately move on?

If this isn’t a huge warning sign that the US Corporate News media never had honest intentions, that the US Corporate News Media never cared about child rape victims, and that the US Corporate News media is more about trying to control what people believe like a censorship bureau for the One Percent than actually caring about the truth, then what more evidence do we need? Why would they mock MAGA for this? Why on earth would anyone with honest intentions immediately and deliberately try to make this into Partisanship over them feeling distraught that Child Rape Survivors will never get justice? Regardless of your political beliefs, please seriously think about that. It’s too late for them to pretend that isn’t what they just did, we all just saw it and so many apparently wealthier Liberals mocked and insulted others for this, some taking statements by Rape Survivors out of context to label them crazy in the most deliberate and misogynistic way possible, and they laugh that it was “obvious” that any list would be destroyed. They would literally rather dehumanize people for old Twitter comments than pay any amount of attention to actual Child Rape survivors, unless it was to subtlety mock them too just to bash MAGA. Now, I want to be clear, that it obviously isn’t all Liberals and some Liberals have joined MAGA in outrage on social media, but added caveats that President Trump may have incriminating evidence of how much he himself knew and what days and times that he knew of what Jeffrey Epstein was doing; arguing that it was probably deeper than what was made public. Some have argued that he and other wealthy elites may have participated themselves. It seems as if we’ll never know the truth.

The way the Mainstream US Corporate media has acted… is just a huge neon warning sign that we’d be stupid to ever believe or trust them ever again. They absolutely did not realize the consequences of what they’ve done here. Maybe I’m wrong about what I think the consequences will be, but it seems like our political system has degraded into just expecting Murphy’s Law to continue without fail, year after year. I can’t write an exhaustive list and go through all the angles; I can only speak on what my understanding was based upon reading a few articles about the Jeffrey Epstein child-trafficking scandal through the years. It seems as if these so-called journalists in the US are intentionally trying to ignore their own reporting several years ago in order to deliberately conflate Rape Survivor testimonies with so-called MAGA conspiracy theories to politicize this issue and to ensure that Rape Survivor testimonies are effectively ignored by creating this conflation with all deliberate haste. There’s no reason to believe them ever again and the risk in doing so is every regular American family being unable to have any justice if any rich person part of the One Percent, foreign dignitary or not, decides to rape their children. Either every rape survivor, associate, employee, and the blueprints of Epstein’s private estates were all lies for the past decade or the US Corporate News media is willfully lying to protect the One Percent right now. If this doesn’t irrevocably destroy their credibility after the non-existent WMDs that Iraq purportedly had, the bias in favor of Hillary Clinton’s Presidential bid, and the shutting down of peaceful protests of both Left and Right-wing protesters from the independent and right-leaning movement of the Tea Party to the left-leaning Occupy Wall Street, then I don’t know what will.

I’ll give a brief glimpse into the information from what little I know, but anyone who reads this information or has known of it should understand why the claims that no one else was involved makes no sense given the testimonies of the Rape Survivors.

From Gabriel Sherman’s “She Was Shaking Uncontrollably”: Powerful Men, Disturbing New Details in Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein Documents” article on Vanity Fair published on August 9^th, 2019:

The Jeffrey Epstein scandal has so far unfolded like a horror movie played on a broken projector: The gruesomeness is clear, but many details remain obscured by sealed court records and confidential settlements Epstein signed with several alleged victims. In the elite worlds of Manhattan, Washington, Palm Beach, and Silicon Valley in which Epstein operated, his former friends and business associates have been left to nervously wait to see who among them might be named as participants in his alleged sex ring.

Today, the resolution is considerably sharper. Following a judge’s order, a federal court released the first batch of thousands of pages of sealed records related to a defamation lawsuit Epstein’s self-described “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre filed against Epstein’s alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. And the documents, for the first time, reveal the names of powerful men who Giuffre alleges Maxwell and Epstein forced her to have sex with, as well as new details about Epstein’s relationships with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Donald Trump. “A lot of important people are going to have a really bad weekend,” one person involved in the litigation told me. (Attorneys for Maxwell and Epstein did not respond to a request for comment.)

Perhaps the most eye-opening of the names is hedge-fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, who Giuffre alleges was the first powerful man Epstein and Maxwell directed her to first have sex with, sometime in 2001. Dubin and Epstein’s friendship has been well documented ever since it was revealed last month that Epstein had invested millions in Dubin’s hedge fund Highbridge Capital and helped engineer JPMorgan’s acquisition of Dubin’s firm. (Epstein had previously dated Dubin’s wife, the former model turned physician Eva Andersson.) After Epstein’s release from a Florida prison in 2010, Andersson reportedly wrote a letter to his probation officer asserting it was okay for Epstein to be around their children. In an email statement, a spokesperson for Dubin wrote: “Glenn and Eva Dubin are outraged by the allegations against them in the unsealed court records and categorically reject them.”

Giuffre also alleges Epstein and Maxwell told her to have sex with former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson; former Democratic Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell; the late MIT computer scientist Marvin Minsky; and MC2 model agency cofounder Jean Luc Brunel, as well as an unnamed “prince,” “foreign president,” and owner of “a French hotel chain.” Giuffre previously alleged she had been forced by Epstein and Maxwell to have sex with lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Britain’s Prince Andrew.

A spokesperson for Richardson said in a statement: “These allegations and inferences are completely false…To be clear, in Governor Richardson’s limited interactions with Mr. Epstein, he never saw him in the presence of young or underage girls. Governor Richardson has never been to Mr. Epstein’s residence in the Virgin Islands. Governor Richardson has never met Ms. Giuffre.”

Mitchell said in a statement: “The allegation contained in the released documents is false. I have never met, spoken with or had any contact with Ms. Giuffre. In my contacts with Mr. Epstein I never observed or suspected any inappropriate conduct with underage girls. I only learned of his actions when they were reported in the media related to his prosecution in Florida. We have had no further contact.”

Brunel’s attorney Andrew Frisch did not respond to a request for comment. Both Dershowitz and Prince Andrew have in the past denied Giuffre’s allegations.

While the contours of Giuffre’s account have been known—she was a 16-year-old who says she was recruited into the massage ring by Maxwell in the summer of 2000 from the spa at Mar-a-Lago—the specificity in which Giuffre and others describe Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking operation add a grisly new dimension to the scandal. There are chilling photographs of Giuffre at Epstein’s Zorro ranch in New Mexico and posing with Prince Andrew and Maxwell at Maxwell’s London flat, and copies of handwritten message pads from Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. (One message about an alleged victim reads: “She is wondering if 2:30 is o.k. She needs to stay in school.”)

Epstein accuser Johanna Sjoberg said under oath that Maxwell approached her on her college campus with the promise of a job answering Epstein’s phones, but within a day she was coerced into having sex with Epstein. Epstein once told her “he needed to have three orgasms a day. It was biological, like eating,” she recalled.

In a sworn deposition, Rinaldo Rizzo, the former house manager at the Dubins’ Palm Beach mansion, described a harrowing incident in which a 15-year-old Swedish girl showed up at the house and said Epstein and Maxwell had tried to force her to have sex at Epstein’s private Caribbean island. When she refused, Maxwell took her passport.

“Was she in fear?” a lawyer asked.

“Yes,” Rizzo recalled.

“You could tell?”

“Yes. She was shaking uncontrollably.”

For those in Epstein’s world who haven’t been named, they’re far from in the clear. The documents today are only the first tranche of many more to come, not to mention evidence produced in Epstein’s criminal trial. “It’s all going to come out,” Giuffre’s lawyer David Boies told me.

This story has been updated.

And details on how Epstein ran his operation from The Sun’s October 20^th, 2021 article “EYES WIDE OPEN Epstein’s Zorro Ranch had computer rooms the ‘size of houses’ to spy on guests including Prince Andrew, victim claims” by Katy Forrester:

JEFFREY Epstein’s notorious Zorro Ranch had three computer rooms “the size of houses” to spy on famous guests including Prince Andrew, one of the pedophile’s victims has claimed.

Former employee Maria Farmer alleges footage would include the Duke of York’s alleged seven-day stay at Epstein’s 33,339 square foot desert estate in New Mexico in 2000.

Epstein reportedly had the warped idea of using the ranch for inseminating women with his sperm with the aim of creating a ‘master race’.

Local radio station owner Eddy Aragon has obtained architect plans, which date back to 1998, five years after Epstein purchased the property.

The plans, obtained by The Sun, reveal a huge underground floor, around 8,000 sq ft in size, which includes exercise, massage and jacuzzi rooms, later transformed into a pool area.

They also show three unusually large “mechanical rooms” on this lower floor.

Farmer claims the rooms, usually for a boiler and electrics, were packed with Epstein and alleged accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell’s computers and video equipment for his spying network.

She told The Sun: “All of Epstein’s residences had these mechanical rooms and tunnel systems. I know this because Epstein told me.

“These rooms were enormous – bigger than houses. I have no idea why anyone needs so many computers in one room.

“There were pinhole cameras to record everything on every estate. The cameras were ubiquitous. You couldn’t see them unless they were pointed out to you.”

Epstein had many guests at his ranch over the years, including Prince Andrew, who allegedly vacationed there with his neurosurgeon ‘friend’ Dr Melanie Walker, whom former Zorro housekeeper Deidre Stratton described as “beautiful, young and brilliant”.

Stratton previously claimed she was tasked with looking after the royal and his guest, who asked her for tea which would make him “horny”, claiming: “She asked me to find one that would make him more horny, that he hadn’t been interested in her. I’m guessing because she understood her job was to entertain him.”

The Sun previously reached out to Walker, who has never commented on her relationship with the Duke.

The Duke also allegedly spent two days alone at Epstein’s ranch in 2001 with the billionaire paedophile’s “sex slave” Virginia Roberts, court documents claimed.

 

DUKE’S SECRET STAY

A manuscript written by Ms Roberts – who was 17 or 18 at the time – says he had “a really good time” and that she gave him “erotic massages,” later being paid “close to a thousand dollars” by Epstein.

Farmer, 51, worked as the in-house artist and receptionist at Epstein’s New York home in 1996 before being transferred to businessman Les Wexner’s 23-room, 10,600 sq ft estate in New Albany, Ohio, where she claims to have been abused by Epstein and Maxwell.

In January, a shareholder lawsuit was filed against Wexner, 84, and senior leadership at his old clothing company L Brands, which states Wexner, and wife Abigail, let Epstein “use their home for liaisons with victims”.

Wexner has never been criminally accused of involvement in Epstein’s sex crimes, and insists that he was duped by him and ended their relationship after the predator’s first arrest in 2007, on charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution.

“Being taken advantage of by someone who was so sick, so cunning, so depraved is something that I’m embarrassed that I was even close to,” Wexner said during a speech in September 2019.

Aragon, who owns Albuquerque radio station Rock of Talk, spoke to Zorro’s architect and a former IT contractor, who worked on Epstein’s internet communications and security from 1999 to 2007 and provided inside photos.

He was told a six-foot naked portrait of Ghislaine Maxwell with a gold dagger in her hand had been put in the basement elevator hallway and was the first thing that any of their guests, including victims, would see on the way down to the basement, massage and pool areas.

Aragon says: “The architect called into my radio show and had been sitting on these plans for some time.

“These plans give us a firmer idea of what was going on at the ranch.

“Although the house is for sale, the brokers won’t talk to you about the ranch without you being a qualified party, which means you have to be someone with money, who can prove they can buy it in cash, that’s the only way to view the place.

“All of that in the basement feels more like a dungeon with the nebulous mechanical rooms.

“A six foot by six foot oversized portrait of Ghislaine Maxwell, with her legs fully spread, completely naked, and a golden dagger in her right hand, was dead center in the elevator hall of the basement.

“I think that was used to intimidate the young women, who were there alone and isolated.

“The contractor who supplied the photographs stated that he can’t ever get the image out of his mind, and it is one of the most bizarre things that he’s ever seen.”

The 59-year-old British socialite will face six charges at her at trial, including sex trafficking conspiracy and the sex trafficking of a minor.

She has been in prison for 471 days in New York after being arrested in July 2020.

Zorro Ranch, which has stood eerily empty since Epstein’s death, only being looked after by a few onsite staff, is now on the market for $27.5million with Sotherby’s.

For such an extensive property, it has only four bedrooms.

RANCH NOW FOR SALE

Epstein’s master bedroom, which takes over virtually the whole of the second floor, and, on the same level, there were two comparatively tiny en-suite bedrooms and a further “staff bedroom” on the first floor.

As Aragon points out, it’s understandable why underage victims have complained about feeling terrified and trapped.

“If you have 33,000 sq ft of space, you would have, say, 12 bedrooms, especially when you hear about Jeffrey Epstein talk about a baby-making ranch. What is strange is that this wasn’t built for that purpose.

“Every room, from a closet to a toilet to a bathroom, on the second floor seems to have a ‘vestibule’. Were these holding areas? Do the women bathe, then dress and get held up in the vestibule, before they visit Epstein?

“The maze of rooms, doors, vestibules, waiting areas and doors, there’s no doubt were used to maximum effect to trap and contain the victims until they were needed for Epstein’s rituals.

“There appears to be no escape, can you imagine how that would feel for young teenage girls? They must have felt so hopeless and vulnerable.”

Farmer’s younger sister Annie was allegedly introduced reluctantly by her sister to an eager Maxwell and Epstein, who coerced Annie to visit Zorro alone and sexually assaulted her at the age of 16.

She sued Maxwell and Epstein’s estate in November 2019 with the lawsuit stating: “She was alone with Epstein and Maxwell. She had no way to access a phone or other method of communication without Epstein or Maxwell knowing. She had no way of leaving.

“Annie knew she had no way of escaping Epstein’s massive estate, and attempted to escape by saying she needed to use the restroom. She was in shock, and frightened by what she was experiencing.

Virginia Giuffre, who reportedly died from an apparent suicide earlier this year on April 25^th, 2025 albeit details have not been given, had several contentious legal battles that provide details that further discredit the US Corporate News Media’s current attempts to dismiss claims of other participants in Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking ring. From the Time Magazine website on October 21^st, 2021, from journalist Eloise Barry in an article titled “Prince Andrew Is Being Sued by a Victim of Jeffrey Epstein for Sexual Abuse. Here’s What to Know About the Lawsuit” and I’ll add a bold emphasis on the most important part on the bottom paragraph of the quote:

How has Prince Andrew responded?

Prince Andrew has denied all allegations against him. In 2019, he laid out his defense in an interview with the BBC, claiming he does not even remember meeting Giuffre and that he was with his daughter, Princess Beatrice, on the night Giuffre says they met in London.

However, the Prince has been unable to explain a photograph appearing to show him with his arm around a 17-year-old Giuffre, with Maxwell appearing in the background. In 2019 unidentified “sources close to” Andrew told British newspapers the Daily Telegraph and the London Evening Standard there were signs the photograph was inauthentic—a claim refuted by Giuffre’s lawyers.

Andrew’s lawyers argue that an agreement made by Giuffre when she settled a damages claim against Epstein in 2009 to not sue anyone else connected to Epstein “releases the duke and others from any all potential liability.” Giuffre’s lawyers agreed to release sealed documents detailing the agreement between Giuffre and Epstein, but claim they are “irrelevant” to the civil case.

Furthermore, after he failed to stall or stop it, they settled out-of-court for an undisclosed amount as Prince Andrew clearly didn’t want this to go to trial. Looking back, it should be asked, can the One Percent, including Foreign Dignitaries like Prince Andrews and likely Saudi Princes as well, just go to the United States, rape whatever young child they find, and know that the US Court system will protect them over their fellow US’s citizens? From NBC News in an article titled “Prince Andrew settles sex abuse lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre” by Tom Winter, Sarah Fitzpatrick, and Corky Siemaszko published on February 15, 2022 reads as follows:

Prince Andrew has reached a legal settlement with a woman who alleges she was 17 when she was sexually abused by the British royal, according to a legal filing made public Tuesday.

The move came more than a month after U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan for the Southern District of New York rejected Andrew’s bid to dismiss a federal lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre.

“Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew have reached an out of court settlement,” David Boies, Giuffre’s lawyer, said in a letter filed to the court.

“The parties will file a stipulated dismissal upon Ms. Giuffre’s receipt of the settlement
(the sum of which is not being disclosed).”

Giuffre has long alleged she was trafficked to Andrew, son of Queen Elizabeth II, by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his recently-convicted confidant, the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell.

In the letter, Andrew said that he would make a “substantial” donation to Giuffre’s victims rights group and that he “never intended to malign” her character.

“It is known that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked countless young girls over many years,” the letter states. “Prince Andrew regrets his association with Epstein, and commends the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors in standing up for themselves and others. He pledges to demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein by supporting the fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims.”

A representative for Andrew declined to comment on the latest development.

A Buckingham Palace official also declined to comment, saying, “It is a matter for the Duke and his legal team.”

Giuffre, who lives in Australia, alleges Epstein and Maxwell forced her in the 1990s to have sex with Andrew when she was underage, an allegation both the prince and Maxwell have repeatedly denied.

So did Epstein, who hanged himself in a Manhattan jail in 2019.

Andrew, via his lawyers, tried and failed several times to derail Giuffre’s lawsuit.

First they tried to argue that the suit should be dismissed because Giuffre no longer lives in the United States, but Kaplan disagreed.

Then, Andrew’s lawyers released details of a legal settlement in which she took $500,000 from Epstein in 2009 not to bring further legal action.

Kaplan said that the prince’s efforts to bring up the settlement were premature.

The day after the ruling, Buckingham Palace signaled it was distancing itself from the controversial case by announcing that Andrew would no longer use the style “His Royal Highness” in any official capacity.

“The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen,” it said.

Virginia Giuffre had a contentious legal battle with Alan Dershowitz too, where she recanted that he raped her. However, the problem I have with this is the bizarre timeline that a Google search helped to clarify:

If the One Percent and their lawyers can just sue your lawyers to prevent them from representing you in court to force a lengthy and drawn-out legal battle that costs people financially, then how is this not a gross miscarriage of justice? Someone please explain this to me, if I’m too dumb to understand this.

Incidentally, an old podcast interview with Alan Dershowitz’s resurfaced where he confirmed the following while the US Corporate News media has been trying to portray the Epstein Client List as a MAGA conspiracy theory. In TheHill’s July 10^th, 2025 article titled “Dershowitz says he knows Epstein client list names: ‘But I’m bound by confidentiality’” by Ashleigh Fields which explains as follows:

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect the timing of Sean Spicer’s conversation with Alan Dershowitz. The interview was initially released in March, and Spicer reposted it on July 11.

Pundit Sean Spicer resurfaced on Thursday a March interview with Alan Dershowitz in which the attorney said he knows all about a list of Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged clients.

“I know the names of the individuals. I know why they’re being suppressed. I know who’s suppressing them,” Dershowitz said during an appearance on “The Sean Spicer Show” that was originally broadcast on March 19 and was reposted on social media on Thursday.

“But I’m bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases, and I can’t disclose what I know,” he added, noting at one point he was falsely named as a client.

The Trump administration vowed earlier this year to release the documents and names of individuals tied to Epstein’s inner circle.

Tech billionaire Elon Musk ignited flames after reminding the public that President Trump was formerly one of Epstein’s acquaintances after dissing the “big, beautiful bill.”

The president brushed off comments related to Epstein earlier this week.

“Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy’s been talked about for years. You’re asking — we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable,” Trump said Tuesday to a reporter who asked about the convicted sex offender and financier.

The White House has maintained that there is no “client list,” a narrative that some question.

“I think what’s really just astonishing about this recent disclosure from the government is that they know they are sitting on a treasure trove of information, and they’re not turning it over. And I’ve worked on these cases for over 10 years now — there’s a plethora of information that the public has not been able to see relating to Epstein and his co-conspirators,” Sigrid McCawley, who is representing several Epstein victims in their civil cases, said during an appearance on NewsNation this week.

Dershowitz, in the March interview, said the list is being withheld in an effort to “protect” those involved with Epstein’s crimes.

“I know the names of people whose files are being suppressed in order to protect them, and that’s wrong,” he told Spicer.

One of Epstein’s victims, Virginia Giuffre, died by suicide earlier this year following long-term illness and decades of trauma related to sexual abuse.

McCawley says those who were involved in helping Epstein commit his crimes should be held accountable.

“Epstein could not have run this operation without the help of many people. He needed a lawyer who would, you know, cover things up for him. He needed an accountant who would funnel money in certain ways,” McCawley said.

“And as we know, he had a group of people around him who helped protect him and help that scheme to continue running. None of those people have been prosecuted.”

The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.

Updated at 1:11 p.m. EDT July 11

There seems to have been an attempt at a character assassination of Virginia Giuffre due to an incident involving a school bus and a car driven by her caretaker. People have cited the police report as definitive evidence dismissing Giuffre’s claims, but when researching this incident, I found two very odd contradictions. The first might just be my own confusion from the word choice but it seems the parents statements about the kids being fine and the bus driver’s statement about the children getting off the bus and being distraught are in contradiction. However, the second reason is the alarming one. The article “My children were on the school bus and Virginia Giuffre’s story doesn’t add up” an April 3^rd, 2025 by Andrea Hamblin on The Telegraph (under paywall) asserts the police never went to the scene of the crash and never investigated (bold emphasis added by me):

Emmie-Rose Wright with her three children, who were on the school bus involved in the crash with Virginia Giuffre Credit: Philip Gostelow

Parents have defended a school bus driver accused of crashing into Virginia Giuffre at 70mph, which she alleges caused life-threatening kidney failure.

Ms Giuffre, a Jeffrey Epstein victim who has accused the Duke of York of sexually assaulting her as a teenager, said earlier this week she had just days to live after she was hit by a bus in Western Australia.

However parents of the children involved have backed the driver’s claim that the collision was minor, with the bus travelling at a lower speed that could not have caused the bruising to Ms Giuffre’s face seen in a photo she posted on social media.

Speaking to The Telegraph, they said Ms Giuffre’s statements were “lies” and that the “whole story is sick”.

Emmie-Rose Wright, said her children — aged five, eight and nine – reported that the crash only caused slight damage to the rear brake light of the Toyota Highlander Ms Giuffre was travelling in.

“They [the children] got off the bus and said that they had had a small crash,” she said. “There’s no damage to the bus and none of the kids are injured.”

Virginia Giuffre said earlier this week she had just days to live after she was hit by a bus in Western Australia

She said the 29 children on the bus had not been “distraught” over the incident, as Ms Giuffre’s family has suggested.

“They weren’t worried or traumatised at all…they thought that she had stopped in front of them unnecessarily.”

Ms Wright described Ross Munns, the bus driver, as an “upstanding member of the community”, saying she “wholeheartedly” believed he would not speed or leave an injured person without medical help.

“If an occupant of a vehicle had been injured, there’s no way he would have left and not called the ambulance,” Ms Wright said.

On Thursday, the school bus was seen at the site of the crash, and appeared to be without any visible damage, with no debris left on the road.

Ms Wright and another parent, Hayley Miller, said the bus was intact when their children alighted about 15 minutes after the crash occurred.

Ms Miller said she was “disgusted” that Ms Giuffre would share a photograph of a bruised and grazed face alongside unfounded allegations against the driver they trust with their children’s lives.

“The whole story is sick and I don’t know what’s true and what is not but I do know [the injuries] are not from the bus incident,” she said.

“It’s lies. I don’t know what she is trying to get from all of it… but I do feel bad for her and I hope she gets help.”

Mr Munns has said he was travelling at a speed under 45mph when he was forced to brake on a rural road for a slow-moving car carrying Ms Giuffre, which was being driven by a 71-year-old “carer”.

“The driver basically pulled out in front of me. I made sure she was alright,” Mr Munns said.

At first he did not realise there was a passenger involved, but the driver phoned the next day to say someone in the car had a “black eye”.

Mr Munns was in disbelief when he saw a photograph of Ms Giuffre with bruises and grazes down one side of her face.

“There is no way you could get that injury [from the crash],” he said.

When the incident happened on March 24, Mr Munns was driving the bus along his usual route through the farming community of Neergabby.

He said police had “laughed” when they were tasked with photographing his undamaged bus for evidence after Ms Giuffre went public with the allegation.

The school bus driven by Ross Munns on the road at Neergabby Credit: Philip Gostelow

He swapped contact details with the motorist at the time, but thought it so “minor” he did not take photographs at the scene.

“I didn’t even take a photo [of the car’s damage] because it wasn’t warranted,” he said.

“I asked if she [the driver] lived here and she said, ‘no I’m a carer’, and I told her she needs to put her indicator on when you have to turn.

“That’s all the conversation was, and she asked how the kids were and I said, ‘fine’.”

Police said there was a collision between a car and a bus, but there were “no injuries reported as a result of the crash”.

They said the car sustained 2,000 Australian dollars (£968) worth of damage.

Mr Munns was under no legal obligation to report the crash to police, given he believed no one was hurt and the damage was “minor”, but said he did so because he felt there was something suspicious about the incident.

“We swapped phone numbers and I had a look around and I asked if everything was ok and the next morning she rang… that’s when she told me there was another person in the car who had a black eye.”

Ross Munns has contradicted Virginia Giuffre’s account of the incident, insisting that the car was in a minor collision with his bus

It earlier emerged that Ms Giuffre appeared in court over allegedly breaching a family violence restraining order 10 days before the crash.

The alleged breach happened on Feb 2, after the mother-of-three reportedly separated from her husband.

Representatives for Ms Giuffre told The Telegraph on Wednesday that her husband of 22 years had been granted a restraining order against her even though he was alleged to have “brutally assaulted” her in January.

They claimed that Robert Giuffre “used the system intended to protect victims to his advantage”.

“Virginia looks forward to defending herself against his malicious claim. She is deeply concerned about her children who remain in Robert’s custody. Virginia continues to be hospitalised in serious condition,” they said.

When Ms Giuffre posted on Instagram that she had just days to live, she added that she was “ready to go, just not until I see my babies one last time”.

A previous post by Ms Giuffre on March 22 included the caption: “My beautiful babies have no clue how much I love them and they’re being poisoned with lies. I miss them so very much. I have been through hell & back in my 41 years but this is incredibly hurting me worse than anything else. Hurt me, abuse me but don’t take my babies.”

Sky Roberts, Ms Giuffre’s father, told The Telegraph on Monday that his daughter was depressed and wanted to be reunited with her children.

“She’s not doing good. She’s depressed because she misses her kids,” he said.

On Tuesday, a statement from Ms Giuffre’s family read: “Virginia thanks everyone for the outpouring of love and support. She is overwhelmed with gratitude. Today she remains in serious condition while receiving medical care.

“On March 24, in rural Western Australia, a school bus hit the car in which she was riding. The police were called but said that there was no one available to come to the scene.

“They asked if anyone was injured and suggested that if they were, they should make their way to the hospital.”

The statement added: “The school bus driver had a bus full of distraught children and left the scene to get them back, saying he would file a police report, which he did later. Virginia was banged up and bruised and returned home.

“Virginia’s condition worsened and she was admitted to the hospital.”

Ms Giuffre had until recently been living a quiet life in Perth with her husband and three children after spending over a decade speaking out about the sexual abuse she suffered at the hands of Epstein.

In 2021, she filed a lawsuit against Prince Andrew accusing him of raping her when she was 17, after Epstein and his long-time accomplice and lover Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to London.

Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years for sex trafficking in 2021.

A year later, Ms Giuffre agreed to an out-of-court settlement with Prince Andrew, understood to be worth millions of pounds. The joint statement contained no admission of liability.

Finally, Virginia Giuffre’s Instagram message prior to her apparent suicide:

Now, this has been interpreted by some people as a suicide message and even referenced on Reddit as one, due to the “ready to go” portion. However, doesn’t that ignore the preceding sentence and full context of the message? It read to me like she was simply depressed and stating she wanted to see her children before being transferred to a specialist for surgery and not that she was suicidal when she said “ready to go” as some have interpreted. Please note, even if she was depressed, that wouldn’t mean that she’s suicidal. When I read this statement, it reads as if she just wanted to see her children before going in for a serious life-threatening surgery, but not that she wanted to die. Maybe I’m looking too much into it, but I don’t understand why people automatically interpreted this to be a suicide message or some sort of mental breakdown just because she was depressed.

There are several problems that maybe I’m wrong about, but I feel it is important to ask; I’m sorry if these questions sound insane, but this is how my mind sees it. The main question I have to ask is this: how on earth can Americans in the One Percent expect anyone outside of the upper-wealthy demographics to fight US wars now? War propaganda typically requires moral arguments about imperatives and necessities to go to war, but if the US Federal government and both Political Parties just play games and shut down any meaningful investigation into wealthy people – including foreign ones – being able to get away with participating in child sex trafficking of your average American child, then what moral arguments can you use to justify future wars against foreign nation-states in order to pursue US national interests? Why should anyone be enraged about immorality like child sex trafficking rings in foreign countries, if we’re not serious about stopping it in the United States? This is the most high-profile and nationally conscious example, which the US Corporate news media is trying to sweep under the rug as harebrained conspiracy theory nonsense, despite the fact Ghislaine Maxwell is in jail… for conspiracy to traffic children to have them raped. If this is how a national investigation ends for a child sex trafficking ring that was occurring for around seventeen years, and people internalize that no justice will ever come for the Rape Survivors, then how is this not a clear sign that Wealthy foreigners and Wealthy Americans of the One Percent are allowed to go into the US, rape any regular American child they want, and then have the US government, Special Interest Groups, the US Corporate News Media, and US Politicians to make a bunch of angry bluster for ten years, wait for attention to die down, and then protect the wealthy child rapists? What other outcome is there of such a blatantly corrupt system other than its eventual dissolution, especially since this decision has been done in the wake of successful political assassinations of a businessman and a State Congressperson?

What do serious issues like child sex trafficking gaining more public attention actually accomplish? If massive public consciousness on the national level of an approximately seventeen-year child sex trafficking ring doesn’t get justice for Rape Survivors, and the US Corporate media patiently waits and then successfully makes it into a partisan issue to mock the political “extremist” groups they hate to deliberately shut down the testimony of Rape Survivors, then what does making people more aware of issues as serious as child sex trafficking actually accomplish? Regular Americans were the most aware of this issue beyond any other child sex trafficking issue in modern times, there was no grey area about any of this, it has led to no further criminal convictions, and the US Corporate media’s deliberate mockery of the Rape Survivor testimonies with conflating their statements with supposed conspiracy theories. What does “believe all victims” matter as a campaign by the US Corporate media, if they will do everything in their power to shut it down when it becomes inconvenient to the US Corporate media’s interests? The way they’ve acted before on specious rumors and the way they’re acting now on a confirmed child sex trafficking ring is such a massive tonal dissonance that I genuinely don’t understand how or why we should ever trust them again or even why regular Americans should pay subscriptions for their content, if their only interests are serving the One Percent. Why don’t they demand the One Percent pay their salaries directly from their personal accounts, if they’re so eager to label anything that disagrees with them as extremist, conspiracy theory-driven, or far-right? Centrism seems to just mean that anything disagreeing with the US One Percent, when their personal interests are in danger, should be ridiculed as insanity for having any opinions outside what the One Percent finds acceptable.

And since I’m sure people will try to find a foreign country to belittle and feel superior towards due to our bad habit as Americans of needing to denigrate other countries with projection so we feel superior to them, consider this Times of India article in 2018 on the findings of rape cases per a hundred-thousand (the meaning of the term lakh) titled “Countries with the most Rape Cases” published on April 24, 2018:

It’s long past the time to start facing the ugly truth.

Other articles I couldn’t incorporate, but which are important and for those who may want to do further reading:

News Nation’s timeline of events. 

Yahoo News July 8th, 2025 article by Holly Baltz “Jeffrey Epstein timeline: How the Florida case led to15 more years of sex abuse” explanation for how it went on for more than 15 years. 

The Jeffrey Epstein saga began — and could have ended — in Palm Beach County in 2006. The Palm Beach Post sued in 2019 to find out why it didn’t. Now, secret documents detailing what happened 17 years ago when Epstein was indicted on only a single prostitution charge could become public under a new state law. 

The Jeffrey Epstein case began in Palm Beach County in 2005, though it was later revealed in Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case that his sexual abuse of children here began a decade earlier. In the 1990s, Maxwell enlisted Epstein’s chauffeur and traveled all over the county to find girls for Epstein. She picked up one of the most spotlighted ones, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, at Mar-a-Lago where the 15-year-old and her father worked.

Tennessee House Representative Tim Burchett did an interview with The Hill where he gives his thoughts: “I think the files existed at one time,” Burchett said in an interview on NewsNation’s “On Balance” with host Leland Vittert. “I think they were destroyed in the previous administration.”

According to The Guardian’s May 10th, 2021 article, Melinda Gates began divorce proceedings with Bill Gates because he kept privately meeting Jeffrey Epstein in the article titled “Melinda Gates began divorce moves at time Bill’s meetings with Jeffrey Epstein revealed” with a snippet below:

Melinda is said to have expressed unease at Bill’s relationship with Epstein since at least 2013. Her meeting with divorce lawyers in October 2019 is said to have taken place at roughly the same time as a New York Times article detailed Bill’s meetings with Epstein, which included an overnight stay at Epstein’s New York mansion.

The article, which detailed Epstein’s connections with the rich and powerful, said none of them “compared in prestige and power to the [then] world’s second-richest person, a brilliant and intensely private luminary: Bill Gates. And unlike many others, Mr Gates started the relationship after Mr Epstein was convicted of sex crimes.”

According to NBC News on May 2025, Mary Farmer, one of the Rape Survivors, is suing the US Federal government for the FBI having done nothing after reporting Epstein in 2006.  

Journalist Nick Bryant’s information on Epstein’s butler’s black book with a with a redacted version here and Mother Jones’s Leland Nally’s findings when calling all the numbers that responded. Nick Bryant has also launched a Change.org petition hoping to put more pressure for government accountability, I know Change.org is generally useless but I signed it due to feeling utterly depressed that this has happened. 

---

If nothing else, this definitely proves that US and Western culture has failed to seriously grapple with problems involving cases of child rape in our society. For more on such topics:

US Failure to protect Native American human rights from Registered Sex Offenders: Ongoing Policy of Institutional Genocide still in effect to this day, Why Pro-Enlightenment values are failing in the US due to this issue, and a Peaceful Redress of Grievances.

A List of the Catholic Church’s Child Rape Cases. Compare this to consenting adults “ruining” the Church in Black American Churches. There was however a sex trafficking ring of young Black girls from broken families by male pedophiles involved in street crime. It was given attention in a documentary called “Very Young Girls” for those who want to learn more about the violence and trauma that young Black women in lower-income neighborhoods of NYC experienced. A friend who was supportive of BLM and the human rights of Black Americans in general mentioned it to me back in 2011. I watched it with another friend many years ago and my friend was shocked that the perpetrators only got as little as eleven years for all the horrific and disgusting crimes they committed.

Sexual violence and sex trafficking of young girls has a long history stretching back to Medieval Europe within Western culture. A book review on the historical Elizabeth Bathory; she was effectively a Medieval European sex trafficker of children and many of her fellow Nobles willingly helped her do this to their own daughters.

The British Monarchy can still abuse their power and they aren’t limited to just ceremonial duties.

Reddit CEO Ellen K. Pao’s tweet and how Reddit and Discord’s policies protect abusers over victims.