L.B. vs United States sent back to District Court: US District Court will determine if US Federal Government is liable when Federal Law Enforcement Rape Indigenous Women in Native American Reservations: If they rule in favor of the US government again, then why is this not State-sponsored Rape Campaigns by the US Government upon Native American people living in Reservations?

“We were appalled that the Department of Justice, under Attorney General Merrick Garland’s leadership, continued for years to fight L.B. in her pursuit of justice,” states Mary Kathryn Nagle, attorney for NIWRC. “We now call on the Trump Administration to not repeat the injustices of the Biden Administration but to, instead, carve a new path of healing and reconciliation and send a strong message to Native women everywhere that assaults against Native women will not be tolerated.”

While the US Corporate media devolves into overglorified Trump bashing and election-cycle gossiping programs; the Montana 9th circuit court will determine on June 3rd whether US Federal government and US State government are liable when US Federal law enforcement rape Indigenous women living in reservations while on duty.

L.B. vs US court case, Table of Contents: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (2024) District Court Retrial (2025) https://casetext.com/case/lb-v-united-states-1 https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/20-35514/20-35514-2021-08-06.html  https://casetext.com/case/lb-v-united-states https://www.niwrc.org/news/colt-and-niwrc-stand-lb-ninth-circuit https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/lb-v-united-states-america-indian-bureau-affairs-amicus-brief  (The original link, seems to have been removed, here's another to read the full contents: https://web.archive.org/web/20231030000902/https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/211015_aclu-mt_l.b._amicus_brief.pdf) While the corporate media have turned into the Donald Trump news channels; an actual human rights issue … Continue reading While the US Corporate media devolves into overglorified Trump bashing and election-cycle gossiping programs; the Montana 9th circuit court will determine on June 3rd whether US Federal government and US State government are liable when US Federal law enforcement rape Indigenous women living in reservations while on duty.

Challenged myself to self-publish this within a week, Sex Offenders over Service Members: How US Federal Law privileges Registered Sex Offenders to rape and kill Indigenous Service Members’ families

For a country that purports to champion human rights, the US Government and US national news media seem to categorically ignore the impacts a Supreme Court decision that still allows predominately White male, registered sex offenders to rape and kill Native Americans living in reservations with impunity. It emboldens these sex offenders to assault, rape, and kill Native American women even outside of reservations. Both the US government and the US mainstream media seem to purposefully ignore the disastrous impact William Rehnquist's majority decision has had on the families of Indigenous service members and they shield registered sex offenders from any real scrutiny. This book was re-arranged and re-purposed from an assortment of blog posts from the author's blog.

A Plea for Help: Calling Our US Senators to Demand Equal Rights for Indigenous Americans by Overturning the US Supreme Court decision of Oliphant vs Suquamish (1978)

There can be no middle-ground in recognizing our US Founders policies and attitudes towards Native Americans as a purposeful and ongoing US Federal Policy of Genocide.

Critical Analysis: Why I Reject Sam Harris’s Arguments about the Superiority of Western Values and Why I Hate myself for having believed His Arguments

Sam Harris's arguments in favor of the supremacy of Western Values conveniently ignores the legal policy of auto-genocide imposed upon Indigenous people by the US government that still has negative consequences to this day.