I’ve learned the hard way, from both personal experience and viewing opinions on people who have passed on, that most people – even those advocating for human rights – don’t care about human rights activists. It’s like a dirty word for most people or perhaps viewed as a nuisance. Even after people like Christopher Hitchens died, others continue to slander him. Wokeism made this form of dehumanization easier than ever, especially when it came to the topic of Islam. If you criticize Islam, you’re synonymous with a bigot despite all the terrorism from beheadings to bomb blasts, to the rape of children, and so many more horrible behaviors. Even when you’re trying to be as polite and kind as possible, people treat you like a bigot and having any sort of “discussion” is beneath them. It’s like… holy crap, do you not realize the long-term consequences of this behavior in the face of a religion that encourages children to throw hand grenades and make improvised explosives? Does that not penetrate your brain, even after news reports confirm this type of sadism is happening?

I can’t predict the future, I don’t know how my critique of Islam will stand, but I believe that I’ve said just about everything possible on the topic of Islam as a political entity in human affairs that I can say. I wanted to give as much as I thought possible in terms of my research and knowledge, and shared it first online on my blog for the purposes of mass dissemination, so that people could make more informed decisions and clearly understand why shutting down discussions on Islam was problematic. I don’t even really care if Youtubers – whether in Hindi or other indigenous Indian languages or English copy the ideas, because the whole point is to share them to hopefully decrease Islamic violence as much as humanely possible. I have no idea what impact that my book will or won’t have in the future, but judging from my entire body of work . . . probably nothing. Nevertheless, I felt compelled to write it – regardless of how positive or negative that made people view me – or how little attention it’ll receive, because we cannot continue living in a world where mythology is given privilege over human lives. That’s just not an acceptable standard and the older generation needs to just grow-up and understand that none of these religious myths have any iota of truth in terms of divinity. When people speak of the divine, they’re speaking about their own personal sense-objects and illusory concepts that they’re attempting to impose on reality. When Muslim Dawahs and Christian missionaries preach their religions to convert Hindus, they’re preaching their own infantile delusions to Hindus. That is why you haven’t been able to convert Hindus for over a thousand generations; to most Hindus, you look like a mentally ill person preaching your mental illness to convince others to become mentally ill like you when you go on your psychopathic delusions about hell, Satan, the condemnations of so-called idol worship which honestly always sounds like you’re all mentally ill to me because it is a belief that is presupposing thought crimes, and especially Jesus Christ as the Messiah. You are just unwell if you believe this delusional 1^st or 7^th century bullcrap and you need to let go of your fairy tales and grow-up as a person; perhaps look in the mirror at what you’re trying to deny about your own mentally ill state. You’re all so obsessed with Satan in your bizarre attempt to claim everything that disagrees with you is satanic, evil, or idol worship; like, you have no idea how abjectly insane you sound to me. You are just not a mentally well person, if you vilify so-called “idol worship” because you’re vilifying your own delusional fictional concept and imposing your delusional fictional idea on other people. Whenever I hear someone scream about how I’ll be burning in “the fire” for not accepting Islam or that Jesus Christ is the truth, the way, and the life – I seriously think that person would be safer in a mental institution where they can get the help that they need because they’re clearly mentally ill. These are the same groups that use their mental illness to then dehumanize Transgender / Third-Gender people, gays and lesbians, and so forth with horrifying punishments and murder, and for what? How is the violence inflicted upon the LGBT by Christian and Muslims not merely confirmation that the ones advocating for these lunatic Judgment Day beliefs are clearly mentally ill? It’s very odd that Christians argue that LGBT people are mentally ill, yet their conservative cultural legacy of violence against LGBT people isn’t seen as a form of mental illness despite the violence they inflict. The same is true for all the rapes going on in the Middle East where child marriage is legally or informally permitted due to Islamic culture and all the rapes happening to young boys throughout multifarious denominations of Christian Churches. Why is all of that not proof that Christianity and Islam promote mental illness? Why should terrorism not be seen as the ultimate form of mental illness caused by the teachings of Divine Command in the Quran?

Given how much Islamic terrorism increases and rears its unending head like a hydra, I just can’t rationally view anything related to divinity in any other way anymore, and I can’t be as polite as I was about it before because that changed nothing. Islam has no scientific evidence to support it and it is killing and ruining the lives of so many innocent people. I wanted to do the best I could to support fellow Hindus who are continually and wrongly maligned despite the historic brutality of both Islam and Anglicanism in India, the violent threats of beheading that Islamists in India threaten whenever they’re butthurt about the Prophet Mohammad even now, and just the disgusting amount of lies from both the US Corporate news media and Western – predominately White – Indologists who flagrantly lie over every iota of information and blame the descendants of genocide victims while supporting their mass murderers as heroes or somehow ambiguous despite what Islam teaches. I honestly can’t think of a more disgusting, despicable, and vile institution than Religious Studies of Indology in Europe and the US, at this point. Do they understand they have no moral difference between themselves and Neo-Nazis who deny the Holocaust? There is genuinely no moral difference between the two unless you value one set of human lives above another. I would say the same if they were committing the same behavior upon Kenyans, the Irish, Jewish people, Native Americans, or Tasmanian Aboriginals. If historical genocides matter as a form of moral condemnation, then their denial is a form of genocide denial. It arguably does not matter the amount of people lost in terms of genocide denial; the willful denial and revisionist history replete with lies is an act of willfully supporting genocide in and of itself. That’s fundamentally what these people simply are and they use academia and academic freedom as a shield for hate and bigotry; and everyone comes to their defense, despite the fact that their own guidelines in the Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy makes it clear that they have no criteria of proof or evidence-based reasoning; they just make it all up, they don’t study history, they don’t study archaeology, and it’s abundantly clear that they don’t care about it.

If you disagree, please consider the following; as here’s something most probably don’t realize about the issue of Islam’s history in India: If the Western Indologists knew Hindus were being beheaded by Islamists in India for any criticism of Islam, then they knew that Hindus couldn’t argue back against their vilification of Hinduism by pointing to Islamic history in India without being killed in India and the Western Indologists like Romilia Thapar, Sheldon Pollock, Cynthia Talbot, Wendy Doniger, Audrey Truschke, and Andrew J. Nicholson would have been doing this deliberately. If they claim expertise, how did they not know this basic fact that has been going on within Islam since before it even arrived in India, and for which Western Europe and the US have abundant examples to point towards? How were they not deliberately lying? I guess I should save more of my criticisms for another blog, but I’m wondering if it even matters.

I hope that for those who take an interest and read that more peaceful solutions can be made in de-converting Muslims and ending Islamism within our lifetimes, if my book can help fellow Hindus and others to achieve that. It simply is not fair how Hindus of India continue to be mistreated by so many groups who clearly don’t have much of an understanding of how truly dangerous Islamism is, even when it harms their societies. You would think after the murder of Salwan Momika and the attack on Salman Rushdie that people would wake-up to these problems, but they’re treated as if they’re divorced entirely from Islam as a religion, which is not an honest assessment at all. Sam Harris was correct about it being a failure of compassion, if we don’t criticize Islam, even if he went about it in the stupidest manner possible by subscribing to racism as the solution. I find that too many make this issue about themselves and not enough attention is spent on the merits of the arguments. It is a danger to people’s security and safety, if they still don’t know what Sharia is or if they believe Sharia is a conspiracy; only giving a more informed critique based upon facts, including sharing this information with Muslims who probably don’t know as much about it as they should, is going to change behaviors. I’m sure most of the people who banned me off of Discord servers, subreddits, and internet forums probably thought I was some lunatic who didn’t know much about Islam and not someone who literally got this information from reading purely Islamic sources of what learned Muslims (including Imams) themselves proclaim about their faith. I’ve found more damning information on Islam from Imams sharing their truthful views on various Islamic websites in which they explain and cite Islamic value systems than from anywhere else. The problem then becomes if it is utilized by people like myself, then they delete the information or change it once they become aware.

Nevertheless, I think “A Hindu Critiques Islam” is just about all that I can say about the problems of Islam. I hope that it helps fellow Hindus as I was very concerned by how little their human rights seemed to matter due to both Abrahamic (specifically Christian and Islamic colonizer faiths) bigotry towards Hindus and the total disinformation campaign on what the problems in India’s society are. People keep parroting the Caste system when Caste discrimination is less than 20 percent of India and ignorantly believe the gotra system is the same thing. They do not understand that Islamism literally teaches Muslims to revere the 7^th century of the Prophet Mohammad’s time and to regress all civilizations into that model of society in order to await the Mahdi to lead people to Jesus Christ, who is the Messiah of Islam. In particular, Christians have a hard time accepting that this is what Islam’s Judgment Day / Day of Resurrection entails. It’s honestly so fucking stupid that people believe any other religious belief system is somehow lesser than this worthless crap. Like, how does the fact that the Prophet Mohammad was an illiterate man not make Muslims realize how much dumber Islam is compared to faith traditions that had different points of view from people who were actually literate? Moreover, Christians and Muslims have been warring, robbing, raping, and slaughtering each other for years over different interpretations of the same Messiah figure of Jesus Christ. If that isn’t proof that the teachings of Jesus Christ – which “good Muslims” also read, they’re encouraged to read the New Testament albeit view it as a corrupted document of the “true” gospels that they believe Jesus was given by the Abrahamic God – are violent and hateful, then what is? The majority of the Abrahamic tradition is a veneration of violent, narcissistic lunatics making psychopathic claims about reality and trying to brainwash the rest of the planet into their mental illness. If you’re serious about peacefully ending Islam, then A Hindu Critiques Islam is the best I can offer and I hope you find it valuable.

It’ll probably be my last Political Science book. It’s been roughly ten years since I’ve written Poli Sci and religious critique books, and I think I’m done. It clearly doesn’t matter much to most others and while I do feel happy making them, and I’m glad I can now point to a book I’ve written articulating all the issues I have with Islam in a thoughtful critique just like the other subject matters I’ve discussed, I’m not sure if people are truly interested, no one really gives me any feedback on what I’m doing wrong or how I can improve, and I don’t want to always be circling around the same political issues. I have to just accept the fact that, no matter how much I’d like for their to be positive and peaceful change, most people are indifferent and the only thing I can really do is give my input explaining issues as I understand them and suggesting solutions that might be advantageous to people who may want them. But it’s really up to people themselves and they have the right to judge me as either useful or useless and if I’m being useless, then there’s not much of a logical point to continuing. Also, I do want to focus on just writing fiction instead of political science topics, which I’ve held back for far too long. With political science, I constantly agonize making sure all the information is as correct as can be, but I still make serious blunders – I’ve certainly learned over and over the limits of my knowledge of India’s government as it functions and I’ve needed to re-read and re-learn to make-up for those mistakes – and I have to chronically cite, double-check the citations, and make sure the sentence I’m citing is clear so that people understand. I often add “for reference” as an additional explanation to the citation so people can more readily read the part that I’m citing. With fiction – except with maybe clothing, magic systems, and other parts of worldbuilding – it’ll probably far less detail-oriented and I can just focus on a more fun activity. I’m not sure it’ll do well or not, but if it helps, I never intend to ever use AI for any of the writing. I want it to be authentic whether people like it, or find it boring, or dislike it.

What is likely to be my final Political Science book, A Hindu Critiques Islam, is submitted on Amazon for self-publishing, I tried to keep it as low as monetarily possible from Amazon’s guidelines. It’ll be released on 9/11/2025. The physical versions says it is finished with the review process, but doesn’t allow me to see it. I’m unsure if they’ll censor the picture I added on the back cover or not. The Kindle and physical versions have improved corrections on any typos, unclear sentences in grammar, and so forth. Amazon’s physical distribution doesn’t seem to have India included, so unfortunately it’ll only be mostly Western countries, but Kindle devices are apparently more popular in India than it is in the US judging from survey samples I recall reading years ago. If you found my writing to be worth your time, please consider purchasing a copy.

India Link: https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0FNL826QD

US Link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FNL826QD

Australian Link: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0FNL826QD